Reducing Racial Disparities in Local Jurisdictions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Reducing Racial Disparities in Local Jurisdictions

Description:

... Wisdom: The Horse Is Dead So Let's--- --BUY A STRONGER WHIP --CHANGE RIDERS ... at large, music videos, television, the police, judges, the mayor, the governor, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: michael691
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reducing Racial Disparities in Local Jurisdictions


1
Reducing Racial Disparities in Local
Jurisdictions
2
DEAD HORSE
Native American Wisdom When you discover you
are riding a dead horse, the best strategy is to
dismount. Bureaucratic Wisdom The Horse Is
DeadSo Lets--- --BUY A STRONGER WHIP --CHANGE
RIDERS --Say THIS IS THE WAY WE HAVE
ALWAYS RIDDEN THIS HORSE. --APPOINT A
COMMITTEE TO STUDY THE HORSE. --DECLARE
NO HORSE IS TOO DEAD TO BEAT.
3
A Couple of Terms . . .
  • Disproportionate Minority Confinement (DMC) A
    racial/ethnic groups representation in
    confinement exceeds their representation in the
    general population
  • Disparity Different treatment of individuals who
    are similarly situated or who have common
    characteristics

4
BI Philosophy
  • Detention facilities are harmful
  • System stakeholders Community new
    opportunities to develop sustainable alternatives
    to incarceration
  • Need System Maturity

5
Beyond Mere Talk
The work to achieve tangible DMC reduction
results will not succeed unless its champions
are
  • Intentional
  • Unapologetic

6
Process Truths
Process is not NOT SEAMLESS
  • Agency mandates and agendas are inconsistent
  • Leadership Changes
  • Public Will Changes

Process is not NOT QUICK
  • Values must be learned and embraced over time
  • Cultural shifts do not manifest immediately

W. Hayward Burns Institute DMC Training
Institute 2006
7
DMC Work Truths
Kick-Start by a roll of the.
DICE
ata-driven ntentional onsensus-Based ngagement
Focus
8
DATA-DRIVEN
  • Avoid becoming attached to early DMC assumptions
    or prematurely drawing conclusions
  • Let the numbers tell the story
  • Because if you dont . . .

9
The Global Discussion
  • DMC is caused by
  • Racism
  • Poverty
  • Levels of Criminality

10
The Blame Game . . .
  • Its the fault of the kids, the families, the
    community, the parents, society
  • at large, music videos, television, the police,
    judges, the mayor, the governor, the President,
    racism, subtle discrimination, overt
    discrimination, the system, drugs, guns, poor
    education, inadequate housing, the schools, the
    kids, the families, the community . . .

11
Being Intentional
  • Always apply the race lens
  • Identify who will do the leg work
  • Look for opportunities for new/expanded
    programs that can impact the DMC population

12
What Are You Trying to Do?
  • Raise Awareness
  • Data Collection
  • Change Policies
  • Actual Reduction
  • Change Attitudes

13
The Approach to Reducing Disproportionality
  • Demographic Analysis
  • Crimes By Race/Location/Time
  • Community Profile
  • Detention Process
  • Case Processing Issues
  • Objective Decision-Making

14
What This Process Is
  • Strategic
  • Cooperative
  • Voluntary
  • Data Driven
  • Opportunities for Intervention

15
Who is at the Table?
  • Community Groups/Youth
  • Judges
  • Politicians
  • Law Enforcement
  • Advocates
  • Detention and Probation

16
Consensus-Building
  • Process of building agreement never ends
  • Dont let politeness masquerade as consensus
  • Dont jump into strategy before assessing and
    unifying will

17
Data Gathering and Community Profile
  • Detention Data Disaggregated by
  • Race/Offense/Time/Location
  • Community Profile
  • Quantitative
  • Qualitative

18
Community Profile
  • What is this? And Why Do It?
  • A) Quantitative
  • Physical mapping of target
  • Identify community resources/programs for youth
    in target area
  • B) Qualitative
  • Focus Groups, Interviews, Surveys

19
Why Community Engagement?
  • Protection
  • Accountability
  • Urgency
  • Insight

20
The Louisville Experience
21
Secure Detention Data Findings (2004)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
This chart represents the total number of
charges, not the number of juveniles.
25
Reason the bench warrant was issued
  • 44 of the 68 warrants were issued for a Failure
    to Appear at a court hearing

26
Detention Criteria/Detained or Released
  • 58 of the 68 warrants, did not meet detention
    criteria on the original charges.

27
LouisvilleIdentified Strategies to Reduce DMC
  • Developed subcommittees to take an in-depth look
    at the current policies and procedures regarding
    juvenile bench warrants, and to develop
    recommendations to enhance the current process.
  • Juvenile Bench Warrant Subcommittee Reviewed
    policies and procedures used for
  • court notification
  • issuing warrants
  • executing warrants
  • application of detention criteria

28
Enhance the Current Notification Process
Continued
  • Strategies to implement the recommendation
  • Implemented - The CDW office will verify mailing
    addresses for any notices returned through the
    mail for a bad address, including contacting JCPS
    and notifying the juvenile court clerk (if the
    case is going to juvenile court).
  • Implemented - Request contact information from
    Jefferson County Public Schools.
  • Pending - Establish a process where the system
    makes contact with youth to remind and/or notify
    youth and parents/guardians of scheduled court
    dates.
  • Pending - Develop a Contact Sheet Form for all
    youth to complete while in Juvenile Court. The
    form shall be placed in the court file, so that
    the latest contact information is available for
    notification purposes.

29
Key Lessons Learned
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com