Moonbuggy Rear Suspension Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Moonbuggy Rear Suspension Analysis

Description:

Perform finite element analysis of moon buggy suspension using ANSYS Workbench. Evaluate stress and deformation ... Car Suspension and Handling. Bastow, Donald. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: amberr9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Moonbuggy Rear Suspension Analysis


1
  • Moonbuggy Rear Suspension Analysis
  • ME450 Computer-Aided Engineering Analysis
  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, IUPUI
  • Instructor Dr. Koshrow Nematollahi
  • May 1, 2006
  • John Fearncombe
  • Brandin Ray
  • Amber Russell

2
Objectives
  • Perform finite element analysis of moon buggy
    suspension using ANSYS Workbench
  • Evaluate stress and deformation resulting from
    applied load
  • Perform iterations as needed until a satisfactory
    design is realized

3
Introduction
  • Moon buggy originally designed in Spring 2005 by
    ME 462 design team
  • Lower a-arms on original suspension failed
  • Normal loading conditions were determined to be
    approximately 200 pounds-force
  • The initial design was modeled to determine if it
    could be modified and safely used

4
Theoretical Background
  • Utilized ten-node SOLID92 tetrahedral elements
  • Ideal for complicated solids with curved
    boundaries

5
Model Details for Existing Design
  • Originally modeled in Pro/Engineer (IGES), then
    imported into ANSYS Workbench
  • Static analysis only
  • Aluminum alloy construction
  • 200 pounds-force load applied at shock mount
  • Fixed supports at axes of rotation
  • Displacement constrained in transverse direction

6
ANSYS Workbench Model of Existing Design
7
Deformed Geometry for Existing Design
  • Maximum Deflection of 2.7810-3 inches
  • Maximum deformation occurs near shock absorber
    mount

8
Principal Stresses for Existing Design
  • Maximum principal stress of 1.791 ksi
  • Yield stress for 6061 aluminum alloy is 35 ksi
  • Maximum stresses occur where the part failed

9
Shear Stress for Existing Design
  • Maximum shear stress of 1.421 ksi
  • Deemed insignificant
  • Failure due to fatigue in aluminum

10
Model Details for First Iteration
  • Modeled and constrained as before
  • Aluminum alloy construction
  • 200 pound-force load again applied at shock mount
  • Modeled as one-piece construction with no welds

11
Results - ANSYS Model of First Iteration
12
Deformed Geometry for First Iteration
  • Maximum Deflection of 5.4210-3 inches
  • Occurs below shock absorber mounting bolt

13
Principal Stresses for First Iteration
  • Maximum principal stress of 221.267 psi
  • Yield stress for 6061 aluminum alloy is 35 ksi
  • Maximum stresses occur near the shock absorber
    mounting bolt

14
Shear Stress for First Iteration
  • Maximum shear stress of 20.917 psi
  • Shear stress concentrated near welds
  • Quality of welds had been an issue

15
Model Details for Final Iteration
  • Modeled and constrained as before
  • Aluminum alloy construction with steel
    reinforcement plates at shock absorber mount
  • Two points of attachment to wheel hub housing to
    relieve stress on aluminum members

16
ANSYS Workbench Model of Final Iteration
17
Deformed Geometry for Final Iteration
  • Maximum Deflection of .11410-3 inches
  • Located at mid-section of shock absorber bolt

18
Principal Stresses for Final Iteration
  • Maximum principal stress of 1.875 ksi
  • Yield stress
  • 6061 aluminum alloy is 35 ksi
  • 4140 steel is 45 ksi
  • Maximum stresses occur in the steel reinforcing
    plates

19
Shear Stress for Final Iteration
  • Maximum shear stress of 1.170 ksi
  • Located in steel reinforcing plates
  • Achieved objective of localizing stresses within
    steel elements

20
Impact Statement
  • Through the use of finite element analysis on the
    rear suspension of the moon buggy the vehicle has
    become more safe, stable, and easier to maintain.
  • By optimizing the design before production, we
    have alleviated costly and potentially dangerous
    failures.

21
Conclusion - Advantages of Final Iteration
  • Maximum stress is distributed on steel
    reinforcing plates
  • Ability to quickly and inexpensively replace the
    parts most likely to fail
  • Easier fabrication
  • No reliance on welds for structural stability

22
Suspension Test
23
Bibliography
  • ME 450 Course Text
  • ANSYS Website www.ansys.com
  • Car Suspension and Handling. Bastow, Donald.
    London Pentech Press Warrendale, Penn.
    Society of Automotive Engineers, 1993.
  • Chassis design principles and analysis
    Milliken, William F., 1911-
  • www.engineersedge.com Material Properties
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com