NEGLIGENCE (Unintentional Torts) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

NEGLIGENCE (Unintentional Torts)

Description:

deals with negligence on the part of manufacturers. Manufacturers make sure: ... Car owners are liable for damages that result from the negligent behaviour of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:140
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: aca43
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NEGLIGENCE (Unintentional Torts)


1
NEGLIGENCE(Unintentional Torts)
  • See Chapter 14

2
The elements of negligence
  • Negligence
  • Duty of Care
  • Standard of Care
  • Foreseeability
  • reasonable person
  • Causation cause-in-fact / remoteness of
    damage

3
TYPES OF LIABILITY
4
Product Liability
  • (Donoghue v. Stevenson)
  • -deals with negligence on the part of
    manufacturers
  • Manufacturers make sure
  • design free of harmful defects, product is
    properly manufactured
  • consumer told how to use product safely, warned
    of any risks using the product

5
Occupiers Liability
  • Responsibility of owners or renters to ensure
    that no one entering their premises is injured.
  • Invitees ( invited on your property for a
    business purpose) and licensees ( a person with
    implied permission to visit) are owed a standard
    of care.
  • Trespassers ( on permission or legal right) are
    owed no standard of care, but cannot purposely be
    injured. Children are treated differently-
    allurement something that attracts children and
    might result in harm.

6
Hosts
  • Someone who serves alcohol to guests or paying
    customers ( commercial or social hosts)
  • It has been established that commercial hosts
    have a statutory duty of care to their patrons
    and others.
  • The recent ruling of the Supreme Court in the
    Childs v Zimmerman and Courier case was that the
    social hosts were not responsible. ( However, the
    possibility of social host liability was not
    totally ruled out)

7
Vicarious Liability
  • Legal responsibility for the negligence of
    another person.
  • Employers can be held responsible for the actions
    of their employees, and parents for the actions
    of their children. Car owners are liable for
    damages that result from the negligent behaviour
    of anyone who drives the owners car.

8
  • Motor Vehicle Negligence (379-380)
  • Professional / Medical Negligence ( 369-370)

9
Strict Liability
  • Defendant is automatically liable for an injury
    caused by a dangerous substance or activity even
    if the defendant was not negligent.
  • ( fires, vicious animals, toxic wastes or fumes)

10
Children Negligence
  • Children (or their parents/guardians) can be held
    liable for their actions. ( each case judged on
    its own facts - no clear laws)
  • Children must provide a duty and standard of care
    expected from reasonable children of a similar
    age.

11
  • Parents are not automatically liable for their
    childrens torts it must be shown that the
    proper standard of care was not present.
  • Vicarious liability( the responsibility of one
    person for another persons action) states that
    parents are liable for accidents caused by
    children driving the family car, snowmobile, etc.
  • Parents may also be found liable if it can be
    shown that they were not properly supervising
    their children (eg. cases involving fire and
    guns).

12
Defences to Negligence
  • The most common defences against negligence are
    that
  • Negligence did not exist
  • The defendant did not owe plaintiff any duty of
    care
  • Three commonly used defences

13
Contributory Negligence
  • In the past if the plaintiff was found to be in
    any way at fault for an accident, their right to
    claim damages was denied.
  • Presently, damages are apportioned between the
    defendant and plaintiff if both are in some way
    at fault.
  • The onus is on the defendant to prove that the
    plaintiff was in some way responsible

14
Voluntary Assumption of Risk
  • The defendant must prove that the plaintiff knew
    the possible risk involved in their actions.
  • Sports events - the spectator assumes the risk
    merely by observing the event. Also used in cases
    where passengers were injured by impaired
    drivers.
  • The onus is on the defendant to prove the
    plaintiff was aware of the risk.

15
Inevitable Accident
  • When an accident is a result of unavoidable
    situations - No matter what precautions the
    reasonable person would have taken, the accident
    would have occurred.
  • Cannot foresee the accident happening.
  • Act of God
  • Explanation

16
Statute of Limitations
  • A law that specifies the time within which legal
    action must be taken.
  • Expiry of the time period is a defence in tort
    law.
  • Limitation periods differ depending on law of
    province and the type of defendant.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com