EKOSIASA CBFM CASE STUDIES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

EKOSIASA CBFM CASE STUDIES

Description:

EKOSIASA CBFM CASE STUDIES. J.M. Abdallah. SUA. Morogoro. Background ... The case studies. The project propose two case studies under CBFM: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: umb7
Category:
Tags: case | cbfm | ekosiasa | studies

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EKOSIASA CBFM CASE STUDIES


1
EKOSIASA CBFM CASE STUDIES
  • J.M. Abdallah
  • SUA
  • Morogoro

2
Background
  • The importance of community forestry was felt
    early in the 1980s
  • it was not until the mid 1990s that CBFM started
    making news in Tanzania particularly with the
    famous Duru-Haitemba Community Forest Reserve.

3
Management issues
  • Community Based Forest Management (CBFM) involves
    management of village forest lands or so called
    village forest reserves.
  • In most cases it is designed to transform
    unsustainable management of existing natural
    forests in the villages, to more sustainable
    management.

4
Management issues
  • These forests are managed by village governments
    through established Village Forest Committees
    (VFCs)
  • The VFCs are responsible for day to day forest
    management activities such as patrolling, gap
    planting, and fire fighting in collaboration with
    other villagers.
  • With assistance from local supporting
    organizations, they use forest management
    guidelines and by-laws formulated and approved by
    the respective district council for use in each
    village.

5
Management issues
  • In Community Based Forest Management, the local
    communities are the actual decision makers during
    the planning and implementation,
  • but need to be guided by the District authorities
    through established guidelines
  • These bodies are legal entities with respective
    powers.

6
Management issues
  • Decision making power is based on the fact that
    the CBFM areas are common holds of the local
    communities

7
Management issues
  • Limitation on access to firewood, building
    materials (thatching grass, timber and poles),
    grazing area, source of water, medicines, source
    of food (fruits, honey, mushroom, wild meat), and
    social cultural activities.
  • Locally controlled grazing patterns
  • The bureaucratic approach to conflict resolution
    puts the main emphasis on formal government
    officials and institutions

8
Management issues
  • .despite having a well-defined platform for
    management, implementation has not been without
    problems. The bylaws have at times been used
    successfully to fine and/or send offenders to
    jail. In addition, the Environmental Committees
    have been meeting regularly to deal with
    occurring problems. However, they have not always
    been able to take the appropriate action in some
    of the villages.

9
Management issues..
  • The purpose of CBFM is
  • improved socio-economic situation of the people,
    poverty reduction, improved natural resource
    management and equitable utilization for
    sustainable management
  • Achievement of the objective is based on
    successful implementation of the on-going
    community activities including
  • livestock keeping, farming and management of
    available natural resources (water sources,
    forest, wildlife, land and beekeeping etc.)

10
  • The challenges include ensuring sustainable
    exploitation, benefit sharing, involvement of
    actors and apportioning roles and
    responsibilities among the community, district
    council and central government.
  • Therefore
  • Investigation of the role of CBFM in poverty
    reduction is crucial. is there a link btn
    community conservation and poverty?
  • On the other hand, it is important to examine the
    ways the CBFM may empower various actors and
    actor groups on an equal basis or, on the
    contrary, lead to favorisation of some
    individuals and/or groups and marginalisation of
    others.

11
The case studies
  • The project propose two case studies under CBFM
  • one (Suledo community forest) situated in a dry
    miombo area, with possibilities for harvesting
    timber,
  • and the other (Duru-Haitemba forest) in a wetter
    environment, where communities are likely to
    benefit from eco-tourism activities, eco-friendly
    farming practices as well as harvesting
    non-timber forest products.

12
Suledo community forest
  • Suledo CBFM initiatives started in the Suledo
    area in 1994.
  • is a multi-ethnic society from nine villages.
  • Situated in the south-eastern corner of Kiteto
    District
  • Found in the three Wards of Sunya, Lengatei and
    Dongo, from which it derives its name.
  • bordering Handeni, Kilosa and Kongwa Districts,
    in Arusha region, Tanzania.

13
Suledo community forest
  • The total population of these nine villages is
    53,909.
  • This is a vast and species rich Miombo forest
    covering an area of 167,416 ha.
  • The major and unique characteristic of the forest
    is that it is used mainly for grazing by the
    Maasai who are pastoralists and initially owned
    the land.

14
Suledo community forest
  • Gradual in-migration of other tribes has resulted
    in quite diversified society bringing in other
    land uses mainly farming.
  • The Maasai are also gradually starting farming
    activities as well.
  • This situation brings new challenges to the
    residents who want to continue to manage the
    forest sustainably

15
Duru-Haitemba Forest
  • Duru Haitemba is a miombo woodland forest,
  • lies on low hills about 20 km South of Babati
    town in Babati district Manyara Region- Tanzania.
  • With an area of 9000 ha,
  • the woodlands represent the only remaining tract
    of forest of any significance in the otherwise
    well settled and cultivated Babati District
  • Duru Haitemba is owned and managed by eight
    village communities,
  • each village managing the forest within its
    village land.

16
Duru-Haitemba Forest
  • where after more than 10 years of community
    management the villagers are now considering low
    level commercial harvesting of their forest.
  • communities are also likely to benefit from
    eco-tourism activities, eco-friendly farming
    practices as well.
  • This is because much of the early PFM was carried
    out on degraded forest land that had little
    tradeable timber left.
  • This meant that utilisation opportunities for
    forest managers were limited and long lead-times
    were required before the forests became
    commercially viable
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com