Office of Special Education Programs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Office of Special Education Programs

Description:

An annual report of your activities and performance in meeting the approved ... The percentage of degree/certification recipients employed upon program ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: EHS72
Learn more at: https://nectac.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Office of Special Education Programs


1
GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING
FY 2009
  • Office of Special Education Programs
  • U.S. Department of Education

2
Annual Grant Performance Report
  • An annual report of your activities and
    performance in meeting the approved objectives of
    the project
  • Required for all active grants, including those
    in no cost extension
  • OSEP reviews the report to determine if
    substantial progress has been in order to receive
    continued funding

3
Overview
  • Recognize strong project objectives that can be
    associated with high quality performance measures
  • Develop high-quality, measurable performance
    measures that maximize the potential for
    meaningful data reporting
  • Complete the ED Grant Performance Report (ED
    524B)

4
Why Is This Important?
  • High quality objectives and measures
  • Make it easier for you to measure your progress
  • Allow you to report progress easily and
    quantitatively
  • Allow OSEP staff to gather evidence of program
    effectiveness

5
Goal Objectives - Measures
6
Project Objectives
  • What are you trying to accomplish?

7
High Quality Project Objectives
  • Relevance
  • How relevant is the project objective to the
    overall goal of the program and/or the goal of
    your project?
  • Applicability
  • How applicable is the project objective to the
    specific activities that are being conducted
    through your particular project?

8
High Quality Project Objectives
  • Focus
  • How focused is the project objective?
  • Measurability
  • Are there concepts in the project objective that
    lend themselves to measurement? If so, is
    measurement feasible?

9
Project Objectives -- Examples
  • Recruit and retain high quality students
  • Implement a high-quality personnel development
    program that is aligned to State and national
    professional organization standards
  • Prepare highly qualified personnel to serve young
    children with disabilities and their families

10
Performance Measures
  • How are you measuring your progress in meeting
    your objectives?

11
Performance Measures
  • Measurable indicator used to determine how well
    objectives are being met.
  • How will progress be assessed?
  • How much progress will constitute success?
  • How will it be known if an objective or part of
    an objective has been achieved?

12
Performance Measures
13
Types of Performance Measures
  • Program
  • Measures established by OSEP for the personnel
    development program. These include measures
    established for reporting to Congress under the
    Government Performance and Results Act

14
  • Personnel Development PROGRAM Performance
    Measures
  • Program Performance Measure 1 Percentage of
    projects that incorporate evidence-based
    practices in the curriculum.
  • Program Performance Measure 2 The percentage
    of scholars who exit training programs prior to
    completion due to poor academic performance.     
  • Program Performance Measure 3 The percentage
    of degree/certification recipients employed upon
    program completion who are working in the area(s)
    for which they were trained.   
  •  Program Performance Measure 4 The percentage
    of degree/certification recipients employed upon
    program completion who are working in the area(s)
    in which they were trained and who are fully
    qualified under IDEA and meet any additional
    State requirements that may exist.
  • Program Performance Measure 5 The percentage
    of degree/certification recipients who maintain
    employment for three or more years in the area(s)
    for which they were trained and who are fully
    qualified under IDEA.
  • Program Performance Measure 6 The percentage
    of funds expended on scholars who drop out of
    programs because of 1) poor academic
    performance or 2) scholarship support being
    terminated when the Federal grant to their
    institution ends.

15
Types of Performance Measures
  • Project
  • Measures that the grantee establishes to meet
    their project objectives
  • Project performance measures can address both the
    process of working towards an objective and the
    outcome related to meeting the objective
  • Ensure a mix of both process and outcome measures

16
High Quality Performance Measures
  • High quality performance measures show
  • What will change
  • How much change you expect
  • Who will achieve the change
  • When the change will take place

17
Project Performance Measure Examples
  • Process measure (e.g.)
  • Project staff (who) will implement 4 (how much)
    targeted recruitment activities (what ) during
    each of the first and third years of the grant
    (when)

18
Project Performance Measure Examples
  • Outcome measure (e.g.)
  • Inquiries from potential candidates (who) about
    the program (what) will increase 20 from
    previous recruitment efforts (how much) during
    the first and third years of the grant (when)

19
Project Performance Measure Examples
  • Outcome measure (e.g.)
  • At the end of their program (when), 90 of
    scholars (who) will demonstrate advanced critical
    reflection skills (what) by achieving a
    proficiency score of at least 3 on a 4 point
    rubric (how much)

20
Project Performance Measure Example
  • Process measure (e.g.)
  • By the end of the project period (when), project
    staff (who) will present on activities and
    outcomes of the project (what) at a minimum of 3
    state and national meetings (how much).

21
Common Problems
  • Activities are NOT performance measures
  • If the best response is Yes, we did that, it
    is likely an activity (not a performance measure)
  • Activities
  • Establish a mentoring program
  • Hold an advisory board meeting
  • Process students stipends

22
Common Problems
  • Performance measures need to be measurable
  • Not measurable
  • Collaborative partnerships will be maintained
  • Evaluation will gauge students content
    proficiency and project effectiveness
  • To increase the sustainability of the
    professional development model

23
Summary
  • Projects should have a few clear objectives that
    explain what the project is doing to support the
    overall goal
  • Each objective should have a few, specific
    performance measures to demonstrate how progress
    toward meeting the objective will be measured

24
Completing the 524B
  • The ED 524B is a required reporting form with
    specific instructions.
  • The form is used by all ED grants and has been
    approved by the Office of Management and Budget
    (OMB). Project Directors must follow the
    directions listed in the Dear Colleague letter
    and ED 524B Instructions provided by OSEP

25
(No Transcript)
26
Reporting Period For first year grants, the
date is the beginning of the project year to 30
days before the due date. For grants in years
2-4, it is the date from the end of the previous
reporting period to 30 days before the due date.
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS
27
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS Budget
Expenditures Report the expenditures during the
Reporting Period. Must be data or information
from the business or grants office.
28
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS
Performance Measure Status This will be checked
No since OSEP is asking for data for the
reporting period, not for the budget period.
The date entered here will be the due date for
your Final Performance Report which is 90 days
after the end of the grant.
Signatory must have authority to sign on behalf
of the institution since the grant is from the
Department to the institution and not to an
individual.
29
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHEET
U.S. Department of Education Grant Performance
Report (ED 524B) Executive Summary
OMB No. 1890-0004 Exp. 10-31-2007
PR/ Number (11 characters)_______
(See Instructions) Provide highlights of
the project's activities and the extent to which
the expected outcomes and performance measures
were achieved during the reporting period. Do
NOT include the project abstract.
ED 524B Page 2 of 11
30

PROJECT STATUS CHART
31
PROJECT STATUS CHART
Enter one of the projects objectives on
subsequent pages, you will enter additional
project objectives as submitted in your grant
application.
32
PROJECT STATUS CHART
Enter your PROJECT performance measures that show
you are measuring progress toward meeting the
objective. In addition, enter PROGRAM
performance measures that align with the
objective.
33
PROJECT STATUS CHART
Here you identify if the performance measure is a
project measure, PROJ, or a program measure,
PRGM.
Note Program Measures refer to OSEP Measures
required in all personnel development grants.
Project Measures are unique to your grant.
34

PROJECT STATUS CHART
QUANTITATIVE DATA
Depending on your measure, enter either a raw
number or a ratio and percentage.
In this area of the page, enter information to
explain the quantitative data, as well as
activities the project engaged in to meet the
objective.
35
PROJECT STATUS CHART
QUALITATIVE DATA If measure requires the
collection of qualitative data, then enter N/A
under the Raw Number and Percentage columns.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
In this area of the page, report qualitative data
along with other information you wish to report
regarding the identified objective.
36
Implement a high quality personnel development
program that is aligned to State and national
professional organization standards.
1.a. Performance Measure Measure Type Quantitative Data Quantitative Data Quantitative Data Quantitative Data Quantitative Data Quantitative Data
Percentage of projects that incorporate evidence-based practices in the curriculum. (Measure 1) PROG Target Target Target Actual Performance Data Actual Performance Data Actual Performance Data
Percentage of projects that incorporate evidence-based practices in the curriculum. (Measure 1) PROG Raw Number Ratio Raw Number Ratio
Percentage of projects that incorporate evidence-based practices in the curriculum. (Measure 1) PROG / NA / NA
1.b. Performance Measure Measure Type Quantitative Data Quantitative Data Quantitative Data Quantitative Data Quantitative Data Quantitative Data
Upon completion of a seminar on family partnerships, each cohort of scholars will rate the quality and usefulness of the seminar as 4.5 or greater on a 5-point scale. PROJ Target Target Target Actual Performance Data Actual Performance Data Actual Performance Data
Upon completion of a seminar on family partnerships, each cohort of scholars will rate the quality and usefulness of the seminar as 4.5 or greater on a 5-point scale. PROJ Raw Number Ratio Raw Number Ratio
Upon completion of a seminar on family partnerships, each cohort of scholars will rate the quality and usefulness of the seminar as 4.5 or greater on a 5-point scale. PROJ 4.5 / 4.0 /
1.c. Performance Measure Measure Type Quantitative Data Quantitative Data Quantitative Data Quantitative Data Quantitative Data Quantitative Data
At the midpoint of scholars programs, 85 of scholars will demonstrate at least satisfactory knowledge of working with young children with disabilities and their families by scoring a minimum of 75 (out of 100) on a program designed assessment. PROJ Target Target Target Actual Performance Data Actual Performance Data Actual Performance Data
At the midpoint of scholars programs, 85 of scholars will demonstrate at least satisfactory knowledge of working with young children with disabilities and their families by scoring a minimum of 75 (out of 100) on a program designed assessment. PROJ Raw Number Ratio Raw Number Ratio
At the midpoint of scholars programs, 85 of scholars will demonstrate at least satisfactory knowledge of working with young children with disabilities and their families by scoring a minimum of 75 (out of 100) on a program designed assessment. PROJ 85 0
37
Implement a high quality personnel development
program that is aligned to State and national
professional organization standards.
Explanation of Progress (Include Qualitative Data
and Data Collection Information) (1a) The
project curriculum is based on the States
personnel standards which are consistent with
those of the Division for Early Childhood and the
National Association for the Education of Young
Children. All courses were approved by the
Curriculum Committee in the Graduate School of
Education for our NCATE accreditation process.
Project staff and the Advisory Committee will
review the courses annually to ensure that they
contain current evidence-based practices. In
addition, the project staff is working on a
process to select and evaluate field placements.
The Advisory Committee will review this
process.   (1b) Since this grant is designed
with a focus on strengthening family
partnerships, a required seminar on family
partnerships was identified for more in-depth
evaluation. The seminar was offered during the
Fall 2008 semester. Project staff recruited
families through the State PTI as well as PTI
staff to present on their experiences. Data from
the survey will be used to inform the content of
other courses as well as future seminars.   (1c)
Project staff will design an assessment to
measure students progress in meeting personnel
standards aligned to the courses offered in the
first year of their program. This data will be
used to inform the content of other courses in
the program as well as practicum experiences to
ensure that students are receiving a high quality
personnel development program. Results of the
data will also be used to make adjustment to the
first year program for the second cohort of
students.
38
Final Page of the Report
Section B Refer to the instructions for Section
B in the ED 524B Instructions Section C Include
additional information (recruitment material,
syllabi, evaluation instruments, journal articles)
39
Submitting the 524B
  • Submit the 524B at http//e-Grants.ed.gov
  • Signed ED 524B Cover Sheet must be faxed to
    Kimberly Savoy-Brown at 202-245-7635
  • Two conditions require hard copy or email
    submission rather than submission through
    e-Grants
  • Grants in no-cost extension
  • Grants that have been forward funded

40
Submitting the 524B
  • Regular postal service
  • U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special
    Education Programs
  • Attn Kimberly Savoy-Brown, PCP Room 5060
  • 400 Maryland Avenue, SW
  • Washington, DC 20202
  • Hand delivery or parcel service
  • U.S. Department of Education
  • Attn Kimberly Savoy-Brown, Mail Stop 255
  • LBJ Basement Level 1
  • 400 Maryland Avenue, SW
  • Washington, DC 20202

41
Contact your OSEP Project Officer with any
questions!
  • Due Date April 24, 2009
  • Thank You!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com