KE6316 MD-11F SHA ACCIDENT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

KE6316 MD-11F SHA ACCIDENT

Description:

8 (3 crews, 5 civilians) killed. 4 seriously injured. 36 ... Cockpit Noise Analysis including Engine Noise level. Flight Path Analysis. Focused on other clues ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: got8
Category:
Tags: 11f | accident | sha | cockpit | ke6316

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: KE6316 MD-11F SHA ACCIDENT


1
KE6316 MD-11F SHA ACCIDENT
  • ? ? ?

2
General Information
  • Date 1999. 4. 15
  • Place SHA
  • Injury to Person
  • 8 (3 crews, 5 civilians) killed
  • 4 seriously injured
  • 36 minor injured
  • Damage to Airplane Hull Loss
  • A/C Type MD-11F
  • Year Built 1992
  • Flight Time 28,347 hrs
  • Flight Cycle 4,463
  • Engine PW4460 x 3

3
Conclusion of Accident Investigation
  • CAAC/KCAB/NTSB joint investigation concluded the
    probable cause of the accident for
  • Flight Crews failure of altitude awareness
  • Confusion between Meter Feet unit in ATC
    instructed Altitude
  • Insufficient Pre-departure preparation

4
Findings
  • No Indication of (No finding actually)
  • In-flight Fire
  • In-flight breakage of airplane
  • System Failure
  • Failure in Cargo loading
  • Bomb or DG Explosion in flight
  • Engine Failure
  • F/Os wrong spoken word
  • Lateral deviation of Instrument departure
  • Dive to the ground from 4500 feet in 16 second
  • Crew expressed difficulty in control

5
CAACs conclusion basically based upon
  • Wrong spoken word of altitude unit
  • Stabilizer Trim moved toward AND
  • Simulator (FSB in Long Beach) evaluation
  • No Departure Briefing
  • Not enough operational experience in SHA

6
Lack of Factual Evidences
  • FDR loss
  • Difficulty in defining position of flight control
    related items
  • Difficulty in Corroboration
  • No indication of system failure
  • No warning or alerts of system failure in CVR
  • No indication on the wreckage

7
Factual Evidence vs Situational Evidence
  • Both requires
  • Correlation
  • Corroboration
  • Correction
  • Ask 100 times Why?
  • Stronger supporting facts needed for analysis by
    situation evidence
  • Both must be feasible Make sense!

8
Other View
  • KAL analyzed different point of view
  • Cockpit Noise Analysis including Engine Noise
    level
  • Flight Path Analysis
  • Focused on other clues

9
Other Important Clues
  • Difficulty in Pitch Control
  • Unidentified Noises
  • Abrupt Nose up before Dive
  • Contamination in Elevator control valve

10
Similar Incident or Accident worldwide
  • FeDex crash land in Newark
  • JAL pitch oscillation
  • CAL abrupt pitch oscillation

11
Can human make that kind of control?
  • Dive to crash from 4500ft in 16 second with max
    20 degrees nose up to max 50 degrees nose down
  • Physical limitation of human
  • Engine Noise(Throttle movement)
  • Pilots call out
  • Continuous Trimming down(beginning time)

12
Investigation should be further reviewed
  • CVR analysis
  • A/C Stability Pitch Control
  • Negative-G load stall
  • Engineering Simulation
  • EMI(Electro-magnetic Interference)
  • Flight Path analysis
  • Reason of Lateral deviation

13
Administrational Litigation In Progress
  • Cargo Operation continues currently.
  • ?????.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com