Title: OECD Investment Compact ENTERPRISE POLICY PERFORMANCE
1OECD Investment Compact ENTERPRISE
POLICYPERFORMANCE
A REGIONAL ASSESSMENT
November 2005
2- The SEE ENTERPRISE FORUM is a partnership of
national organisations active in the field of
enterprise policy and support of micro, small and
medium sized enterprises, including the
Ministries of Economy, the Enterprise and SME
Development Agencies, private sector and other
non-governmental organisations. - The SEE Enterprise Forum is currently chaired by
Albania. - The SEE ENTERPRISE FORUM aims at promoting the
exchange of experiences, dialogue and
co-operation among the members of the SME policy
community in South East Europe and in the OECD
countries, through - regular country policy assessments, such as the
Enterprise Policy Performance Assessments - peer reviews such as the recent reviews on
company registration procedures in SEE and on
enhancing private-public - dialogue in Romania
- policy studies such as the Investment Compact
report on the Informal Economy in Albania, - workshops and seminars.
3CONTENTS
- Context and Objectives of EPPAs
- EPPA Structure and Process
- Key lessons learned and main policy
recommendations at regional level - Next steps for EPPAs in 2006
- Contacts
4Context
- The Enterprise Policy Performance Assessments
(EPPAs) were launched in 2002 by the OECD
Investment Compact and the EBRD - Following the signature by SEE countries of the
European Charter for Small Business, the European
Commission (DG Enterprise) joined the OECD-EBRD
team in 2003 - Ten EPPA reports (one for each SEE country plus a
regional report) were published in 2003 - The second series of EPPAs has been published in
2004/2005
Objectives of EPPAs
- Synthesize the private sector perspective on
national government policies to improve the
business environment for local enterprises - Produce an independent and comprehensive
assessment on an annual basis of the enterprise
policies carried out in each of the SEE countries - Promote exchange of experiences and cross country
policy evaluation among the SEE countries
5EPPA Structure and Process
Evaluation process
- Framework for analysis
- Institutional framework for SME policy
- Rule of law and regulatory environment
- Tax policy for small businesses
- Financial instruments for new and small
businesses - Advisory services for new and small businesses
- Business incubators
- Entrepreneurship, education and access to
technology
1. First level measurementDesk research,
secondary sources
2. Second level measurementLocal consultants
with primary dataFocus groups
3. Tripartite debateInvolving government,
OECD/EC/EBRD and private sector
4. Presentation of results
5 Publication of annual report with inputs from
private sector
6Key lessons learned and main policy
recommendations
Institutional framework
- Centralise policy elaboration in single body at
ministerial level and co-ordinate policy with
other ministries - Co-ordinate and monitor implementation with SME
Agency or equivalent - Ensure effective co-ordination between national
level (Ministry, SME Agency) and local level
(regional development agencies, chambers of
commerce, NGOs) - Consult with business sector at all stages of the
process
based on variation of EPPA average rating for
Institutional Framework
7Regulatory environment
- Introduce Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA)
(e.g. Bulgaria and Romania) - Before introducing new regulatory measures, a
detailed economic analysis and an assessment of
its likely impact on SMEs should be carried out - New licenses or permits should be introduced only
if the benefits significantly outweigh the costs
of the measure - Efforts have been made to reduce administrative
barriers (e.g. Guillotine law in Moldova and
Bulldozer Initiative in Bosnia and Herzegovina)
however, business simplification should be an
on-going process rather than a one-time exercise - Progress has been made on registration across SEE
countries (reduction of administrative steps and
costs e.g. Montenegro and more recently Serbia,
Bulgaria and Croatia). The final target now
should be the implementation of a real
one-stop-shop, one day, on-line procedure within
the context of an on-line enterprise database - Outside of registration, strong action is still
needed on the simplification of the procedures
for obtaining licenses, permits and certificates - Licenses and permits should be limited to those
needed on health and safety hazards, building
permits or consumer protection - Introduce the principle silence is consent
(e.g. Bulgaria and Romania) - One-stop-shop
8Tax policy for small business
- The administration of tax policy is as important
as tax rates - The tax system should be
- simple the number of taxes should be limited,
and a simplified single declaration for SMEs
should be seriously considered - transparent SMEs should be consulted well in
advance of changes in the taxes - efficient enterprises should be able to file
their tax returns on-line - Effects on cash flow are particularly important
VAT refunds should be reimbursed with minimum
delays (max. 1 month see e.g. Croatia and
Bulgaria) and intra-tax reconciliation should be
allowed - Equally important are inspections detailed
guidelines for inspections need to be strictly
adhered to, and fixing a maximum number of
inspections should be seriously considered
9Perceptions of Tax Framework
10Financial instruments for small business
- Significant progress has been made in reforming
the banking sector throughout the region, but in
all SEE countries SMEs face difficulties in
getting access to credit - The priority for the governments should be to
approve and implement the legal framework needed
to move from a system based on cash and personal
capital to a system based on bank intermediation
and lending. - Important instruments to shift to a system of
bank intermediation and lending include - Land registration
- Law on collateral
- Law on mortgages
- Law on bankruptcy
- Law on the protection of creditors rights
- (see recent reforms in Bulgaria and Romania)
- Many initiatives have been planned in the area of
credit guarantee schemes mutual credit guarantee
schemes have proven to be effective and should be
encouraged. However, they must be combined with
sound advisory services to exploit their full
potential
11Perceptions of Access to Finance
12Business advisory services
- Most countries in SEE have introduced some form
of general business advisory services. However,
there is an increasing need for more specific
support - The range and value added of business services
provided by the administration should be
improved. For example, by providing advisory
services on - Business planning/feasibility studies
- Export markets
- Access to finance
- Quality standards
- High value added specific services can be
improved through public-private partnership. For
example - As a complement to government advisory services,
a system of vouchers giving access to consulting
services from the private sector can be very
effective (e.g. Macedonia, Croatia) - Governments should co-operate with the private
sector to establish quality standards and a
system of certification for business services
(e.g. Macedonia)
13Perceptions of Business advisory services
14Business incubators
- The objective of business incubators is to foster
the creation of new companies in innovative
sectors - However, in many SEE countries incubators are
still limited in number and resources, and they
are more focused on employment creation rather
than on innovation - The services offered in incubators should be
extended beyond physical infrastructure towards
high value added services. As with business
advisory services, examples include - Business planning / feasibility studies
- Marketing
- Access to finance
- Quality standards
- Mentoring/ business angels
- In moving towards a knowledge-based economy,
incubators should be linked with universities,
research institutions and innovative sectors in
order to become an engine for growth and
productivity
15Entrepreneurship, education and access to
technology
- Education curricula, especially at secondary and
tertiary level, need to be reformed in order to - Embed entrepreneurial behaviour and practical
skills in class activities - Include (small) business management education
- Give individuals the skills they need to perform
in a dynamic market-based economy (i.e.
adaptability, higher level analytical skills) - Vocational training needs to be constantly
monitored in order to ensure an adequate supply
of the skills most needed by SMEs. Useful tools
in improving vocational training are - Greater private sector involvement in the
definition and the operation of the courses - Systematic linkages between local enterprises and
training institutions (e.g. traineeships,
workshops, joint projects) - A great emphasis should be placed in helping SMEs
updating their technologies. Governments should - Promote technological co-operation between SMEs
- Support in-house training
- Consider using targeted incentives for
investments in new technologies
16Next steps for EPPAs in 2006
- Further adapt the EPPA framework around the
European Charter for Small Enterprises and
co-operate with the EC Commission in order to
maximise the impact of the EPPA process (Belgrade
Declaration of October 2005) - Create an analytical index to monitor progress of
implementation of reforms in the SME sector. The
index would allow for an independent and fully
comparable evaluation of government policies - The index will be used to provide targeted
support on key policy issues through workshops,
peer reviews and policy reviews - A first workshop on start-ups will be organised
in late January / early February 2006 in
collaboration with the Stability Pact, LEED and
ETF
17Contacts
Antonio Fanelli Deputy Head of SEE Investment
Compact 2, rue André Pascal 75775 Paris Cedex 16
- France tel 33 1 45 24 97 07 fax33 1 45 24
93 35 antonio.fanelli_at_oecd.org
Anthony O'Sullivan Head of SEE Investment
Compact 2, rue André Pascal 75775 Paris Cedex 16
- France tel 33 1 45 24 97 01 fax33 1 45 24
93 35 anthony.osullivan_at_oecd.org