Assessing Audio Visual Quality - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Assessing Audio Visual Quality

Description:

Error concealment at decoder. reconstruct approximations for damaged parts of pictures and sound ... complete RTP, error concealment, enhanced network simulator ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: Ilda2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Assessing Audio Visual Quality


1
Assessing Audio Visual Quality
  • P905 - AQUAVIT
  • Assessment of Quality for audio-visual signals
    over Internet and UMTS
  • Geoff Morrison, BT Labs

2
Contents
  • Why we are doing this
  • What we want to achieve
  • How we are going about it
  • Who is doing it
  • BT, CSELT, Berkom
  • When are we doing it
  • February 1999 to December 2000
  • The Results

3
Rationale
  • Coding algorithms, such as MPEG-4 and H.263, can
    compress audio and video signals to bit rateslt1
    Mbit/s as available over mobile and IP networks.
  • The impact of impairments, from compression and
    transmission, on users' opinion must be
    understood.
  • Audiovisual communication must be evaluated under
    representative conditions and real tasks, such
    as conversational services and AV database
    retrieval.
  • Network performance must be monitored to
    guarantee a minimum QoS. Need single-ended models
    to check audio and video transmission quality in
    real time.

4
Compression Impairments
  • Digital TV in studios is 216 Mbit/s
  • Lossless compression typically only halves the
    bit rate
  • To reach very low rates requires lossy audio and
    video compression, introducing significant
    distortions

Is the resulting application usable for
purpose? How best to assign a given total bit
rate between video and audio?
5
Transmission Impairments
  • AV bits ltgt data
  • Audiovisual content has a timeliness aspect
  • Critical in conversational applications
  • Important in database retrieval applications
  • Error detection and retransmission protocols not
    ideal for audiovisual content
  • variable delay
  • variable throughput
  • Compressed AV is very sensitive to transmission
    errors, packet loss
  • more compression ? more sensitivity

6
Error Handling
  • Error resilience tools for encoder
  • structure compressed data so that damage is
    localised
  • optimise encoder options for the network
    performance
  • Forward Error Correction
  • improve apparent network performance seen by
    decoder
  • Error concealment at decoder
  • reconstruct approximations for damaged parts of
    pictures and sound
  • Combinations of above

How well do these work in practice?
7
Project Objectives
  • Understand the potential of audio, video and AV
    communication at bit rates lt 1Mbit/s for UMTS and
    IP.
  • Develop tools and techniques for simulation of
    complete audiovisual transmission systems.
  • Develop quality evaluation methods for complete
    audiovisual transmission systems.
  • Investigate the relationship between system
    parameters (network and terminal) and subjective
    quality.
  • Provide guidelines for the system parameters to
    be used for new applications.
  • Encourage the use of audiovisual communication on
    these dominant networks of the future

8
Work Items
  • Define the tests to be performed
  • Develop/implement a UMTS test bed
  • Develop/implement an IP test-bed
  • Conduct subjective tests
  • Make objective measurements and relate them to
    subjective results
  • Disseminate the findings

9
Definition of tests
  • Literature survey for available test methods
  • Select appropriate methods

10
UMTS Test Bed
  • Video codec (MPEG-4 and/or H.263)
  • Audio codec (MPEG AAC, scalable and non-scalable)
  • Error resilience tools (MPEG-4)
  • MPEG-4 multiplex
  • Transmission errors - simulated and perhaps
    actual
  • Error recovery
  • Demux
  • Optimisation of parameters
  • Tools to make objective measurements
  • Production of material for subjective and
    objective tests

11
UMTS Test Bed
  • Baseline non real-time test bed
  • MPEG-4 baseline video codec, AAC and G.723.1
    audio, AL layer and MPEG DMIF
  • Enhanced non real-time test bed
  • Error resilience tools, layered audio

12
UMTS Test Bed
13
IP Test Bed
  • Video codecs (H.263 and/or MPEG-4)
  • Audio codecs (G.723.1, MPEG AAC scalable and n/s)
  • Error resilience tools (ITU-T, MPEG, IETF)
  • Packetisation
  • Transmission errors - simulated, measured
    profiles and actual
  • Error recovery
  • Optimisation of parameters
  • Tools to make objective data measurements
  • Production of material for subjective and
    objective tests

14
IP Test Bed
  • Baseline non real-time test bed
  • G.723.1, H.263, simplified RTP, simple network
    impairment simulator
  • Enhanced non real-time test bed
  • more codecs including MPEG, error resilience,
    complete RTP, error concealment, enhanced network
    simulator
  • Enhanced real-time test bed
  • real time image capture, encoding and decoding

15
IP Test Bed
16
Subjective tests
  • Conventional subjective tests covering a
    suitably wide range of variables
  • the codecs
  • bit rate, video frame rate, audio bandwidth
  • Error conditions (packet loss, delay variability,
    )
  • Protocols (CBR, VBR, ABR, RSVP, ..)
  • Application (one-way, conversational)
  • Users may accept lower quality in return for
    mobility. Testing will seek an estimation of the
    threshold of acceptability of audio and video
    quality in mobile applications

17
Objective measurements
  • Objective assessment of audio quality
  • TOSQA, PAMS, ...
  • Objective assessment of video quality
  • model of human vision
  • other algorithms to objectively estimate users
    opinion
  • Compare subjective and objective assessments
  • Investigate relationship between parameter values
    and subjective audio, video and AV quality
    assessments

18
Double Ended Model
  • Measuring instrument needs both original input to
    encoder and delivered version at decoder output

19
Single Ended Model
  • Measuring instrument needs only decoder output
  • more suitable for live performance monitoring

20
Project Resources
  • 20 man-months

21
Results
  • Reports due in Q4 of 2000.
  • The findings should be of benefit to at least 3
    groups
  • Network Providers. Results such as minimum
    desirable bit rates and error characteristics
    should influence the planning and operation of IP
    and UMTS networks intended to carry audiovisual
    services.
  • Application Providers. The results will provide
    reliable guidance about which applications and
    operating parameters will satisfactorily meet
    customers' expectations and those which will not.
  • Researchers in the field of "human factors". It
    is expected that the project will advance the
    state of the art in perceptual modelling and in
    the understanding of cross-modal effects.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com