WTO WORKSHOP APEC TEL 28 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

WTO WORKSHOP APEC TEL 28

Description:

WTO WORKSHOP APEC TEL 28. Carlos Romero. Vice-Ministry of Communications ... to hinder or block the entrance or continuance of competitors in the market. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: Moc79
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WTO WORKSHOP APEC TEL 28


1
WTO WORKSHOP APEC TEL 28
Case study on implementing the WTOTelecommunicati
ons Reference Paper (PERÚ)
Carlos Romero Vice-Ministry of Communications Mini
stry of Transportation and Communications,
Perú 7 Oct. 2003, Chinese - Taipei
2
Agenda
  • Background
  • Implementing the WTO Reference Paper Perú case
  • Competitive Safeguards
  • Interconnection
  • Universal service
  • License granting criteria
  • Regulatory independence
  • Allocation and use of scarce resources
  • Communications and Information Technology
    indicators

3
Background
4
Background Perú
  • 7 Oct. 1951 GATT ( Ministry of Treasury)
  • Responsible for the international trade
    negotiations WTO Ministry of Tourism and
    Foreign Trade.
  • Apr. 1994 GATS (General Agreement on Trade in
    Services) Uruguay Round. Peru reported
    engagements on telecommunications status quo
  • Added Value Services Thirteen methods defined
  • Apr. 1997 Peru reported specific engagements on
    basic telecommunications.
  • Assuming the services of fixed telephony and
    local and international long distance
    communications would be on a period of
    exclusivity only until June 1999.

5
WTO Telecom Reference Paper
  • As part of the Negotiation Group on Basic
    Telecommunication (GNTB)
  • Includes aspects related with
  • - Competitive safeguards.
  • - Iinterconnection.
  • - Universal service.
  • - License granting criteria
  • - Regulatory independence
  • - Allocation and use of scarce resources
  • Until the end of the negotiation period 44
    Governments deposited Lists that included
    agreements. 31 of them were based on the
    Reference Paper.

6
Implementation the Reference Paper Perú case
7
Reference Paper
1. Competitive Safeguards
The Reference Paper points out that
  • Measures will be maintained to avoid suppliers
    with control position to conduct anticompetitive
    practices. include
  • Crossed allowance
  • Use of the information de competidores with
    anti competitive results.
  • Do not make available at the proper time
    información technical information on the
    essential facilities and relevant appropriate
    information, necessary to offer the services.

8
Implementation RP (1/3)
1. Competitive Safeguards
In the Peruvian case, the implementation involved
the following
  • The operators which provide more than one service
    and have revenues of at least US15 million
    dollars will be obliged to keep their books for
    each business lines.
  • In observance of the rules that forbid the
    crossed allowances, tariffs of the dominant
    service operator in competence, offered by their
    competitors, through the access to the essential
    facilities, will be submitted to a periodic
    imputation test (retail tariffs of dominant
    operator will cover the costs)
  • Unfair Competition Law defines deliberately as
    serious and subject to sanction, the infractions
    aimed at illegally subtracting the clients to a
    competitor.

9
Implementation RP (2/3)
1. Competitive Safeguards
  • To evaluate if there exist anticompetitive
    practices
  • The regulator will determine if through strategic
    behaviors the companies generate obstacles to
    hinder or block the entrance or continuance of
    competitors in the market.
  • The strategic illicit behaviors evaluated are
    those used to illegally increased the costs of
    the competitor or to reduce the costs of the
    offender.
  • We can mentioned the following
  • The systematic limitation
  • Violation of secrets
  • Introduction to the contractual infraction
  • The unfair competition by violation of rules

10
Implementation RP (3/3)
1. Competitive Safeguards
  • The systematic limitation To prevent or hinder
    any third party to establish in the market, as
    long as it surpasses a natural market response.
  • Violation of secrets Spreading and exploiting of
    the secrets by any third party without the
    authorization of the owner. This could be legally
    obtained but under reserve or illegally
    obtained, or to reach secrets by means of
    espionage.
  • Introduction to the contractual infraction It
    considers the induction to the breach of
    contractual obligations through the influence of
    the offender in the counterpart of the affected
    competitor and the induction to the normal
    termination of a contract or the use of a foreign
    contract infraction .
  • The unfair competition by violation of rules
    Avoids to use the market with an unfair advantage
    by law infraction.

11
Reference Paper
2. Interconnection
The Reference paper points out that
  • The purpose of the network interconnection is to
    allow the users of a supplier to communicate with
    the users of another supplier.
  • The interconnection with a dominant operator
    should be assured in any point technically viable
    of the network where
  • - Non discriminatory tariffs and of a quality not
    less favorable than the one offered for its own
    similar services or the services of its
    subsidiaries.
  • On a timely basis and tariffs based in costs
    (transparent and should be sufficiently
    disaggregated.
  • In additional points at a price that should
    reflect the cost of construction of the
    additional facilities.
  • The applicable procedures to the interconnection
    should be available to the public.

12
Implementation RP (1/4)
2. Interconnection
In the Peruvian case study, the implementation of
this principle involved the following
  • The interconnection is of public and social
    interest it is mandatory, and is a special
    condition of the concession.
  • Should be in harmony with the principles of
    neutrality, non discrimination, equal access and
    free and fair competition.
  • Its execution should be done in the terms and
    conditions negotiated in good faith between the
    parts.
  • The operators have the right to ask for and to
    obtain the interconnection with the established
    operators at the right time.

13
Implementation RP (2/4)
2. Interconnection
  • Supervised Negotiation
  • The parts negotiate within the regulatory
    framework in force, but are submitted to the
    rules and determinations of the regulatory
    organism.
  • If after a specific deadline the parties fail to
    reach an agreement, the regulatory organism
    should issue an interconnection order.
  • Three key aspects
  • (i) Establishment of interconnection charges
    limit by default.
  • (ii) Determination of the interconnection
    points
  • (iii) Control of new operators access to the
    essential facilities

14
Implementation RP (3/4)
2. Interconnection
  • Establishment of interconnection charges limit by
    default
  • They should include the interconnection costs,
    contributions to total costs of the one who
    offers the services locally and a reasonable
    profit margin.
  • The use of technologies more efficient and
    available is considered as well as an adequate
    time horizon, and the identification of the
    categories of incorporated costs.
  • The information on costs should be
  • - Provided by the company,
  • - Mechanisms of international comparison
    based on best practices, and
  • - Simulation of an efficient company.

15
Implementation RP (4/4)
2. Interconnection
  • Determination of the interconnection points
  • Determination of the interconnection points by
    the involved operator
  • One in each local area
  • Additional points will be negotiated
  • Control of new operators access to the essential
    facilities
  • For the purposes of interconnection, a network or
    service should be disaggregated in essential
    facilities, that is, the adopted definition in
    the framework of the WTO agreements.
  • The essential facilities will be chosen by the
    operators in the negotiation of the
    interconnection.

16
Reference Paper
3. Universal Service
The Reference Paper points out that
  • Each country defines its own type of world
    service obligation.
  • It should be managed in a transparent way, non
    discriminatory and neutral regarding competition,
  • It should not be more expensive than the
    necessary for the type of world service defined.

17
Implementation RP (1/2)
3. Universal Service
In the Peruvian case study, the implementation
involved the following
  • The concept considered is Universal Access
  • Access to the domestic territory by a group of
    essential telecommunication services.
  • Capacity of access to Internet will be a
    complementary objective. Evaluation of
    Cost-benefit.
  • The operators obligation of universal access,
    pursuant to the concession agreement, involved to
    install at least a payphone in 1,486 rural
    populated centers.
  • The provision of the world access is promoted and
    financed by the Telecommunications Investment
    Fund (FITEL).

18
Implementation RP (2/2)
3. Universal Service
  • Telecommunications Investment Fund (FITEL)
  • Is formed with the contribution of operators
    according to 1 of the total annual amount of
    billed gross income and earned income de final
    and carrier service operators .
  • This fund finances the provision of basic
    telecommunications services in rural zones of the
    country and preferential social interest zones.
  • The service operation is in charge of rural
    operators, selected by competitive bidding
    according to the least subsidy requested for
    installation, operation and maintenance of
    services.
  • The FITEL management is on the responsibility of
    OSIPTEL, and the Ministry approves the rural
    projects submitted by OSIPTEL.

19
Reference Paper
4. License granting criteria
The Reference Regulatory paper states that
  • When a license is required, the public will have
    at their disposal
  • a)   All license concession criteria and the
    terms usually required to resolve.
  • b)     Terms and conditions of licenses
  • Upon request of the interested party, the
    reasons for refusal will be informed.

20
Implementation RP (1/6)
4. License granting criteria
  • To provide telecommunications public services a
    previous concession is required. The granting of
    the concession is formalized by subscribing a
    concession agreement .
  • There are no restrictions on the nationality of
    the capital, being possible to be 100 of foreign
    property. In this case, it is necessary to have a
    domiciled legal representative in the country
  • The number of operators that may provide a
    specific service is not restricted.
  • The operator decides which technology meets
    better his needs, technologies are not regulated.
  • The State does not intervene in characteristic
    aspects of the business activity.

21
Implementation RP (2/6)
4. License granting criteria
In case of Peru, the implementation involved the
following
  • The establishment of maximum terms for granting
    concessions 50 days, and 70 days exceptionally.
  • To inform the public of the procedures,
    requirements, and terms and conditions of the
    concession contained in the type concession
    agreements.
  • During the process, aspects not involved with the
    business management are not evaluated, such as
    specific technologies that the applicant will use
    in providing the services, and studies on
    technical-economic feasibility.

22
Implementation RP (3/6)
4. License granting criteria
  • The granting of a concession may be denied when
  • The national security is in actual or potential
    danger or it is against the public interest
  • The applicant is not up to date with the payments
    on demand resulting from fees, rates and canon
    for any granted concession or authorization
  • The applicant has been fined, and has not
    complied with the previous payment of the same
  • Having not elapsed two (2) years since he was
    sanctioned with the cancellation of any
    concession or authorization of the
    telecommunications service among others.

23
Implementation RP (4/6)
4. License granting criteria
The concessionaire is subject to the following
payments
  • A. Only Payment (prior to the signature of the
    agreement)
  • - Concession fees 0,25 of initial investment.
  • B. Regular payments (annually)
  • - Commercial operating rate of the service
    0,5 BGI
  • - Contributions to the Telecommunications
    Investment Fund, FITEL 1,0 BGI
  • - Contribution of supervision to OSIPTEL 0,5
    BGI
  • - Canon for using radioelectrical spectrum, if
    any.

24
Implementation RP (5/6)
4. License granting criteria
The Policy Guidelines on Telecommunications
Market Opening, establishes
  • the policy of access to the telecommunications
    market should be transparent, objective and
    undiscriminating
  • to apply effectively the administrative
    simplification and celerity principles in
    granting concessions
  • to use competitive mechanisms for designing the
    spectrum when the availability of frequencies
    limits the number of operators in a service.
  • The granting of concessions is carried out
    through two alternative mechanisms
  • (i) Upon request of the party, or
  • (ii) Tender

25
Implementation RP (6/6)
4. License granting criteria
Added Value Services
  • For the provision of Added Value Services, it is
    a requirement to be registered managed by MTC.
  • The added value services are those that by using
    carrier, final or spreading services as a
    support, add any feature or facility to the
    service that serves as it
  • The procedure for such registration is free and
    performed in a maximum term of 10 working days
    upon submitting the application.
  • The providers of added value services make a
    contribution to OSIPTEL (0,5 BGI)
  • The provision of Added Value Services will be
    suspended when the operation causes damage to the
    telecommunications network.

26
Reference Paper
5. Regulatory Independence
The Reference Regulatory paper states that
  • The regulating body will be independent of all
    provider of basic telecommunications services and
    will not answer before it.
  • The regulating body will be independent of all
    provider of basic telecommunications services and
    will not answer before it

27
Implementation RP
5. Regulatory Independence
In case of Peru, the implementation involved the
following
  • Creation of a regulating body (OSIPTEL) with a
    technical, economic and administrative
    independence, and the following functions rules,
    regulation, supervision, inspection, sanction and
    solution of controversies
  • The regulating body develops a methodology of
    work that allows to ensure the most openness in
    the regulatory decision-making
  • - Duty of publishing previously all rules of
    general nature
  • - Public Hearing
  • - Mechanisms of settlement between the
    interested parties for the solution of
    controversies.
  • - Creation of bodies member of a professional
    association ad hoc
  • - Access of the public to the Information
    Services and Documentation.

28
Reference Paper
6. Allocation and use of scarce resources
The Reference Regulatory paper states that
  • All procedure of allocation and use of scarce
    resources (spectrum, numbering and right of way)
    will be performed in an objective, appropriate,
    transparent and undiscriminating way.
  • The details of performed allocations shall be at
    the publics disposal.

29
Implementation RP (1/3)
6. Allocation and use of scarce resources
Scarce Resources
  • The Radioelectric Spectrum consists of a limited
    natural resource that is part of the national
    wealth.
  • It is the Ministrys responsibility to manage,
    determine, assign and control the radioelectric
    frequency spectrum. 
  • It is the Ministrys responsibility to manage and
    assign the numbering.
  • The Policy Guidelines on Telecommunications
    Market Opening establishes measure to be ensure
    the allocation and use of scarce resources
  • Radioelectric spectrum
  • Numbering

30
Implementation RP (2/3)
6. Allocation and use of scarce resources
In case of Peru, the implementation involved the
following
  • Use of competitive mechanisms (competitive
    bidding or tenders) for designing the spectrum
    when the availability of frequencies limits the
    number of operators in a service.
  • The allocation entitles to the right of use of a
    certain portion of radioelectric spectrum. The
    provision of different services in only one band
    will be allowed..
  • Establishing Goals of Frequency Use to be applied
    to all Assignments of Spectrum. Besides,
    mechanisms will be established in order that
    frequencies revert to the State by means of the
    partial or total revocation of the assignment.
  • The amounts for the right of use of the
    radioelectric spectrum and the terms of payment
    of the same will be subject matter of specific
    regulations.

31
Implementation RP (3/3)
6. Allocation and use of scarce resources
  • The competent public entity will publish
    periodically a frequency band program.
  • The Ministry will have a National Registry of
    Frequencies where the performed assignments will
    be registered.
  • The Ministry will establish the procedure and way
    of access of the public to the information of
    such registry, taking into account its degree of
    confidentiality and the national security.
  • The telecommunications operators are enabled to
    receive from the Ministry, the required numbering
    for the operation and commercialization of their
    services.
  • The designation of numbers is performed upon
    request of the interested party or by drawing
    lots, in the strict observance of equity
    principles of access, transparency and celerity.

32
Communications and Information Technology
indicators
33
Telecom services indicators (1/3)
Fixed and mobile telephony services
Source MTC
34
Telecom services indicators (2/3)
International Long Distance tariff variation
performance
Source Osiptel
35
Telecom services indicators (3/3)
Percentage of homes in Metropolitan Lima
Source Apoyo Opinión y Mercado (Junio 2001)
36
Information Technologies (1/5)
Source ITU 2001.
37
Information Technologies (2/5)
Internet users per 100 inhabitants
Source ITU 2001.
38
Information Technologies (3/5)
Percentage of homes in Metropolitan Lima
Source Apoyo Opinión y Mercado (Junio 2001)
39
Information Technologies (4/5)
Outstanding option for medium and low income
sectors
Internet Public Cabins Trend
June 2001 Estimated by 2002 4Q Source
Telecom operatorsInternet survey
byOsiptel Prepared by MTC
40
Information Technologies (5/5)
1867,000 people in Lima access to the Internet
at least once a month (33 of Lima population)
Internet users How do they connect to the
network?
Source Apoyo y Opinión de Mercado (october 2001)
41
Universal Access Indicators (1/2)
Universal Access and FITEL
Source FITEL
42
Universal Access Indicators (2/2)
Universal Access and FITEL
1,600 Internet Public Cabins in rural areas
planned by 2003
Source FITEL
43
Thank you
Arzobispal palace, Lima - PerúPROMPERU's Archive
/ PROMPERU
Machu Picchu, Cusco - PerúCarlos Sala / PROMPERU
More information www.mtc.gob.pe
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com