Title: What Happened and
1Learning From Enron
- What Happened and
- What Does it Mean for Managers?
- Chuck Daly
2Learning from Enron
- What happened inside Enron?
- Corporate practices
- Why did Enron fail?
- File for bankruptcy
- What are the Government Agency Responses?
- What does it mean for managers
3 Scope Issues left for another day
- Enron illustrates the requirements and failings
of Federal securities regulations - Critique of specific audit practices
- ERISA (401k programs)
- Stock options
- Securities analysts practices
4Learning from Enron
- Federal securities laws reporting and disclosure
requirements - Securities Act of 1933
- Securities Exchange Act of 1934
- Generally information collection and
dissemination - Primary requirement is to update financial
information on scheduled, timely basis - Reporting standard companies are responsible for
reporting material facts and for omissions of a
material facts - Also contains a duty to correct
5Enron The Company and its Operations
- Created by the merging of two pipeline companies
in the mid-1980s - Moved slowly away from its hard-assets roots
- From pipelines and energy plants
- To transmission and energy trading
- To innovative commodities trader (energy,
bandwidth, advertising time/space)
6Enron Problematic Practices
- Accounting Special Purpose Entities (SPEs)
- Non-compliance with FAS 57
- Used for hedging transactions
- Used to accomplish asset sales
- Leveraging the Company
- To finance operations
- Guaranteeing Obligations of SPEs
- Enrons Culture (Advancement and Incentive
Plans) - Promoted Greed Culture
- Encouraged employees to hide problems
7Enron Special Purpose Entities
- What are SPEs?
- Traditionally used by finance companies for
securitization - Also used to isolate risky assets (aircraft
leasing, real estate development) - In late 1990s many companies used SPEs to
accelerate revenue recognition - Several additional companies suffering from SPE
use similar to Enron - Xerox (currently being investigated by the SEC),
Global Crossing, Adelphia, Tyco International
8Enron Special Purpose Entities
- Governed by Financial Accounting Standard 57
- Allows SPEs to be kept off the balance sheet if
- Outside owner invests equity capital for a 3 or
greater share of the SPE - Outside owner exercises control over the SPE
- If both criteria are met, gains and losses from
transactions with the SPE can be recorded - Assets and liabilities of the SPE are not
consolidated
9Enron Special Purpose Entities
- How did Enron Use SPEs?
- To circumvent accounting rules
- To boost revenues
- To hide investment losses (hedging with itself)
10Enron Special Purpose Entities
- 2000 Annual Report illustrates use of SPEs
- Note 9 discloses investments in SPEs and shows
revenues of 510 million - 510 million is more than 30 of Enrons net
income for 2000
11Enron Special Purpose Entities
Chart From Financial Times, FT.com
12Enron Special Purpose Entities
- Example
- Joint Energy Development Investment (JEDI)
(formed in 1993) - Properly established with CalPERS as controlling
50 partner - Enron records gains from transactions with JEDI
but does not consolidate JEDIs debt on its
balance sheet - 1997 CalPERs wants to cash out
- Enron needs a new partner to avoid consolidating
JEDI on it balance sheet - Enron executives form Chewco
- Chewco invests borrowed capital (Enron guarantees
Chewco debt)
13Enron Special Purpose Entities
- Success of JEDI and Chewco inspire additional
SPEs - New SPEs used to
- Sell hard assets to increase income
- Engage in hedging transactions
14Highly Leveraged for Operations
- 2000 Annual report shows a debt load of 37
billion (up from 14 billion in 1999) - Many lending agreements containing debt reduction
triggers
15Loan Guarantees and Debt Reduction Triggers
- Enron made promises to lenders to secure capital
for itself and SPEs - Loans and credit facilities contained credit
rating payment clauses - If Enrons credit rating fell below a set level
payment would become due immediately - Pledged stock and options to secure borrowings
for SPEs
16- Incentive Plans
- Cultivating Greed
- compensation plans tightly geared to stock price
- incentive to promote earnings growth and stock
price - Employees focused on earnings growth instead of
business lines or products
The Enron Culture
17- Advancement Practices
- Corporate Culture Promoted Self-Interest
- Bottom 20 of performers forced out
- Incentives based on Enrons earnings per share
(rewarded with stock options) - Practices led to
- Following the letter but not the spirit of FAS 57
(and sometimes not the letter) - Sold assets to SPEs, transferred stock to SPEs to
cover debts, and guaranteed loans to SPEs
The Enron Culture
18Why did Enron file for bankruptcy?
- Greed on a spectacular scale
- Following resignation of Jeff Skilling, Enron and
Arthur Andersen pulled the plug on certain SPEs - originally deemed to satisfy the requirements for
off-balance sheet treatment - review led to recategorizing SPEs and restating
income and debt
19Why did Enron file for bankruptcy?
- The beginning of the end
- October 16, 2001
- 544 million after-tax change related to SPEs
being consolidated - reduced shareholder equity by 1.2 billion
- November JEDI and Chewco arrangement exposed
- forced consolidation of JEDI financials
- Enron financials for 1997-2001 restated
- increased reported debt by 711 million in 1997,
561 million in 1998, 685 million in 1999, and
628 million in 2000
20Why did Enron file for bankruptcy?
- Increase in reported debt from JEDI and Chewco
led to reexamination of Enrons debt rating by
Moodys and SP (downgraded to barely investment
grade) - Moodys and SP further downgrade Enron's debt to
junk - Downgrading trips debt triggers in Enron loans
(4 billion becomes due immediately)
21Lessons for Managers
- Liability under Federal securities laws
- Changes in business practices (regulations)
22Lessons for Managers Liability
- Federal Securities Laws
- Primarily Section 10b of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 - Section 13(b)(2) for directors and officers
- Criminal
- Sections 13(b)(4)-(7), 24 and 32 knowing and
willful standards - Criminal fraud
- Possible prison sentences (new federal law allows
for up to 10 years for a fraud of over 100
million)
23Lessons for Managers Federal Securities Laws
- General Scheme of Anti-fraud
- Designed to promote disclosure
- Section 10b (anti-fraud)
- Common Pitfalls
- Management Discussion and Analysis
- Financial Reporting
24Changes in Business Practices through Regulations
- Corporate
- Record keeping and Corporate Governance
- Accounting - FAS 57
- Securities and Exchange Commission Rules
- Reporting Requirements
- Enforcement Authority
- Lending Practices - reporting of debt triggers
25Lessons for Managers Reform Proposals
- Likely to see a reaction similar to the
Investment Banking scandal in the late 1980s - Greater oversight by regulators
- Codification of best practices
26Lessons for Managers Corporate Reform Proposals
- Greater oversight by Corporate Boards
- Changes in auditing and reporting practices
- Could see requirements for higher percentages of
independent directors on corporate boards - Increased influence of audit committees and
information flow to and through audit committees
27Lessons for Managers Accounting Reform Proposals
- Overhaul Financial Accounting Standard 57
(inclusion of partnership interests) - Valuation of intangible assets
- Greater disclosure of derivatives positions
28Lessons for Managers SEC Reform Proposals
- Increased monitoring of accounting practices and
financial statements - longer review of proxy statements
- more thorough review of securities registrations
- Stronger penalties
29Lessons for Managers Lending Reform Proposals
- Require debt triggers to be reported to rating
agencies - Require debt guarantees to be reported to rating
agencies
30Learning From Enron
- What Happened and
- What Does it Mean for Managers?
- Chuck Daly