Title: Systematic Spin Dynamics Measurement of La2Cu1xLixO4 x0'04, 0'06
1Systematic Spin Dynamics Measurement of
La2Cu1-xLixO4 (x0.04, 0.06 0.1) and Comparison
with Quantum Critical Theory
- Wei Bao
- Los Alamos National Laboratory
- Collaborators
- Y. Chen (NIST), J.E. Lorenzo (CNRS-Grenoble),
- J.L. Sarrao (LANL), A. Stunault (ILL), Y. Qiu
S. Park (NIST) - Discussions
- S. Sachdev, J.W. Ye, A.V. Chubukov, X.G. Wen, T.
Senthil, Q.M. Si, F.C. Zhang, C.M. Varma, Z.Y.
Weng, L. Yu, - A.V. Balatsky, A. Castro Neto, O.P. Sushkov
2MotivationWhy do we bother with Quantum Critical
Theory
- Magnetic excitations important for high-Tc SC
- Few prediction for S(q,?) from microscopic models
of underdoped cuprates - Concrete prediction for S(q,?) by quantum
critical theory (Sachdev Ye 93, ...)
3Universality treat frustration instead of
dopingto avoid randomness, disorder, etc, from
doping
X-order (ZTPG)
4Universal scaling at long wavelengths (low
energies) near a quantum critical point
frustration
- 2D quantum Heisenberg system maps to 21D
classical Heisenberg system with ?Thc/kBT - When kBTltJ, ?Tgta. Quantum effect becomes
important. - At T0, ?T8 map to 3D classical system.
?0(y-yc)-? - Length scale sets by ?min?T, ?0
- Energy scale Ehc/? (z1)
- kBT for TgtTx G(y-yc)? for TltTx. ?/T to
?/G scaling
5Samples La2Cu1-xLixO4
- ?/T scaling obseved for insulating LBaCO LSCO
at x0.05 (Hayden et al. 91, Keimer et al. 91)
for superconducting LSCO x0.14 (Aeppli et al.
97) - Advantage of nonsuperconducting LCLiO
6La2Cu0.94Li0.06O4 q scans
in-plane
out of plane
Bao et.al., PRL 91, 127005 (2003)
7La2Cu0.94Li0.06O4 energy scans
Bao et.al., PRL 91, 127005 (2003)
8From ?/T scaling to const-E scaling
Bao et.al., PRL 91, 127005 (2003)
9Local magnetic susceptibility in QD regime
gapped no fermion scattering with spins
pseudogapped moderate scattering broadening
gapless strong fermion scattering with spins
Y.L.Liu and Z. B. Su, Phys. Lett. A 200, 393
(1995) Sachdev, Chubukov, Sokol, PRB 51,14874
(1995)
10Measured local susceptibility below 50K
Bao et.al., PRL 91, 127005 (2003)
11Crossover around 50K
Bao et.al., PRL 91, 127005 (2003)
12Not Heisenberg to XY crossover
Anisotropic gap 2.5 meV at x0
Remain to be Heisenberg also seen in YBCO,
using polarized neutron Stock et al.,
cond-mat/0505083
13La2Cu0.90Li0.10O4 energy scans
Chen et.al., cond-mat/0408147
14Different exponent and scaling function for x0.04
Chen et.al., cond-mat/0408147
15Scaling plot for S(E)
16Below Tx at higher E, i.e., shorter length than
?0,?/T scaling restored as expected
17Changing exponent and scaling functioncontrolled
by a AF QCT unlikely
- crossover in all three samples
- the same gapless, instead of gapped, spectrum
?(?) in the QD regime. Hole scattering - But critical exponent and scaling function change
at x0.04 - One known mechanism from classical critical
phenomena disorder
18Proposed theories for spin-glass in doped cuprates
- competing AF FM interactions in a 2D plane
- all spins freeze at low T, as in conventional
concentrated (cluster) spin glass - formation of ferromagnetic short-ranged clusters
19No ferromagenetic clusters of Mgt1.4mmB
\\(001)
Chen et al. PRB 72,184401 (2005)
20La2Cu0.96Li0.04O4 energy scans
Chen, Bao et.al., cond-mat/0408147
21Quasielastic scattering at (p,k,p)
Chen et al. PRB 72,184401 (2005)
22Looks like a Bragg peak but not static
23Relative spectral weights of 3 parts
3 parts to S(q,E) 2 glassy 1 liquid
1.5K
24Summary
- First observation of crossover from ?/T scaling
to const-E scaling in hole doped cuprates - Maybe related to QC to QD crossover
- Gapless spectrum in the QD regime
- Variable T exponent and scaling function with
doping - Likely due to disorder, which manifests itself in
the spin-glass transition - Quite different from conventional spin-glass
disordered mainly along the interplane dir. - Mechanism of spin-glass in spin stacking faults,
beyond purely 2D models - Similar scaling crossover in PLCCO (Wilson et
al. 05) similar glassy central peak in LSCO
(Sternlieb et al., 90, Bella ?), YBCO (Stock et
al. 05)
25Phase diagram of (La,Sr)2CuO4 and (Y,Ca)Ba2Cu3O6
µSR, NMR/NQR, M LSCO Harshman et al. (1988),
Sternlieb et al. (1990) Chou et al. (1993)
(1995) YBCO Niedermayer et al. (1998)
26Gapless in QD regime
Chen et.al., cond-mat/0408147
27(No Transcript)