Engineering Design: How to Introduce it in Low Level Courses? PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Engineering Design: How to Introduce it in Low Level Courses?


1
Engineering Design How to Introduce it in Low
Level Courses?
  • Muhammad Taher Abuelmaatti
  • King Fahd University of Petroleum and
    MineralsDepartment of Electrical Engineering

2
What is Said?
  • I was sustained throughout my professional
    career by an undergraduate education that taught
    me how to think and organize my thoughts, how to
    analyze problems in a critical manner, how to
    design solutions to open-ended problems, and how
    to learn on my own
  • Professor David Conner, Ex-Editor, IEEE
    Transactions on Education, 2002

3
  • Employability is best served by training
    graduates who can think
  • Professor Ian Markham, Liverpool Hope University
    College, U.K., 2000
  • The purpose of a university education is not to
    program students in a predetermined job, it is to
    develop their critical and analytical powers. It
    is to teach them to think widely rather than
    narrowly.
  • Vivien Coombs, Westcot Farmohouse, U.K., 2000

4
  • ?Today too many engineering students believe
    they can get by without understanding the
    fundamentals and without paying attention to
    details.
  • S.M. Miri, IEEE T. Education, 1993
  • ? Design skills are the least relevant/used
    skills
  • Employer Survey conducted in 2004 by the College
    of Engineering Sciences, KFUPM

5
  • Design projects must be introduced to satisfy
    the ABET design content in the courses
  • Dr. E. S. Ibrahim, International Journal of
    Electrical Engineering Education, 2004
  • ? I was sustained because my undergraduate
    education required that I rigorously pursue each
    problem to completion with personal discipline.
    (No! I was not subjected to an ABET-mandated
    group capstone project )
  • Professor David Conner, Ex-Editor, IEEE
    Transactions on Education, 2002

6
  • The design projects have been introduced not
    only to satisfy the ABET design content in the
    courses, but also because they have proven to be
    excellent vehicles for teaching the subject and
    for motivating the students
  • Drs. R. Betancourt and W.V. Torre, IEEE
    Transactions on Power Systems, 1989

7
  • Teaching design can change the students
    attitudes about learning fundamentals and dealing
    with details, and thus, can help produce future
    engineers who will be more innovative than many
    of todays practicing engineers.
  • S.M. Miri, IEEE T. on Education, 1993

8
  • ?Design should be an integral part of every
    engineering education
  • M. Moghavvemi, Saudi Technical Conference and
    Exhibition, 2000
  • ? The learner learns only what he himself does
  • J. Alison and F. A. Benson, IEE Proceedings-A,
    1983

9
Who Needs Engineering Design in our Courses?
  • 1. The local industry? NO (the least required
    skill)
  • 2. ABET? YES (for accreditation)
  • 3. How about us, the Faculty and Students ?
    YES! Why ? To help us produce graduates
    who can
  • a. Think.
  • b. Critically analyze.
  • c. Learn on their own.
  • 4. Be innovative.
  • That is Engineers.

10
How to Infuse Design in Low Level Engineering
Courses?
  • I. In the laboratories
  • Hands on experience is the first step of design.
    The best man in the field should be in the
    laboratory not the least experienced and least
    expensive person available.
  • 2. In the laboratory divide students into
    groups, make a competition among the groups. Ask
    the first group who successfully complete the
    experiment to present and share their findings
    with the rest.

11
  • Convert the final laboratory test to a simple
    open-book design project using the design,
    construct and test format. Avoid too complex or
    lengthy projects. Possible distribution of marks
    is 40, 40 and 20 respectively.
  • 4. Show and teach the students how to
    troubleshoot circuits and systems. Do not do it
    yourself. Successful completion of the experiment
    is not the main issue. Students may learn more
    from their failure than from a successful
    experiment that works from the first time.

12
  • 4. Give the students the chance to modify the
    proposed design in order to test their
    understanding of the theory.
  • 5. Even in the very basic courses, make the
    experiments relevant to real life.
  • 6. Make use of the time allocated to the
    laboratory in full.

13
  • 7. Whenever possible avoid using simulation
    packages. The real performance of the circuits
    and systems can be measured only in the
    laboratories. Simulation may be helpful but it
    cannot be a substitute for the practical
    measurements. If you ask the students to perform
    simulation, then you must ask them to compare
    hand-calculation, simulation and practical
    measurements and to find out where and why there
    are differences.

14
  • II. In the lectures
  • Show the students that for any engineering
    problem there is always more than one solution.
    Ask the students to suggest solutions and discuss
    with them the merits and demerits of every
    solution.
  • 2. Always explain the physical meanings of the
    mathematical results. Discuss with the students
    the possible sources of errors in real life
    applications of these results. Always stress the
    approximations made in the models used to obtain
    these mathematical expressions.

15
  • 3. Remember that quality is more important than
    quantity. So given a good raw students what do we
    do? Teach them the importance and power of
    fundamental concepts and how to think.
  • Teach the students to ask the question what if?
  • 5. Teach the students what is the function of
    every single component in the system and how a
    design value can be chosen for it. Also show them
    that calculated values of components can not be
    always met in practice.

16
  • III. In the examinations
  • State the problem clearly and avoid imposing the
    methodology of solving it. Let the students take
    the right decision.
  • ?Always avoid problems requiring just equation
    plugging solutions.
  • Assign marks on the steps of the solution rather
    than on the final answer only.
  • Design questions that have multiple correct
    answers.
  • Avoid reusing questions from old examinations and
    solution manuals.

17
  • Design Projects in Low Level Courses Must
  • Be relevant to course material.
  • Be doable by the student.
  • Be constructed and tested.
  • Be completely worked out by the instructor.
  • Have clear grading and design evaluation
    criteria.

18
  • Possible Sources of Design Projects in Low Level
    Courses
  • By observing what is going on around us and
    asking the question What If?.
  • From technical magazines.
  • By converting text book problems to open ended
    ones by removing a constraint or converting what
    is known to unknown.

19
Conclusion
  • Faculty and students need design in engineering
    courses even if local industry do not require
    it.
  • Faculty must prepare students by incorporating
    design principles and concepts in the courses in
    lectures, in laboratories and in examinations.
  • Faculty have to adopt teaching approaches that
    emphasize thinking rather than memorizing.

20
  • In engineering education nothing can replace the
    teaching of fundamentals and attention to
    details. Teaching engineering design can develop
    deep understanding of the fundamentals.
  • Students learn most effectively through
    successful design experiences.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com