Whistleblowing: The Factors that Contribute to Management Accountants Reporting Questionable Dilemma - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Whistleblowing: The Factors that Contribute to Management Accountants Reporting Questionable Dilemma

Description:

Whistleblowing: The Factors that Contribute to Management Accountants Reporting Questionable Dilemma – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:156
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Ben54
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Whistleblowing: The Factors that Contribute to Management Accountants Reporting Questionable Dilemma


1
Whistleblowing The Factors that Contribute to
Management Accountants Reporting Questionable
Dilemmas
  • Dr. Tara Shawver
  • Kings College
  • tarashawver_at_kings.edu
  • Dr. Lynn Clements
  • Florida Southern College

2
Definition of Whistleblowing
  • Whistleblowing is defined as the disclosure by
    organization members (former or current) of
    illegal, immoral, or illegitimate practices under
    the control of their employers, to persons or
    organizations that may be able to effect action
    (Near and Miceli, 1985).

3
Research Questions
  • What philosophical factors impact the decision
    for management accountants to whistleblow?
  • Moral intensity Scale
  • Magnitude of Consequences
  • Social Consensus
  • Probability of
  • Temporal Immediacy
  • Proximity
  • Concentration of Effect
  • MES Scale
  • Justice
  • Utilitarianism
  • Deontology
  • Egoism
  • Relativism

4
Research Questions
  • What external factors impact the decision for
    accountants to whistleblow?
  • Materiality
  • Anonymity
  • Job satisfaction
  • Ethics code enforcement
  • Organizational commitment
  • Sarbanes-Oxley protections

5
Literature Review
  • Rest (1986)
  • Trevino (1986)
  • Jones (1991)
  • Beadau (1971)
  • Brody (1970 )
  • Ladd (1973)
  • McDevitt and Van Hise (2002)
  • Miceli, Near, and Schwenk (1991)
  • Cohen et al. (1998, 1996, 1993)
  • Near and Miceli (1995)
  • Miceli and Near (1994)
  • Keenan (2002)
  • Verschoor (2006)
  • Shawver and Clements (2006)
  • Shawver et al. (2006)

6
Methodology
  • Eight hundred participants at the Institute of
    Management Accountants (IMA) 2006 annual meeting
    brown bag luncheon were invited to participate in
    this study.
  • 105 people agreed to participate in this study
  • 16 declined to finish the survey, providing 89
    usable responses.
  • This study asks the participants to evaluate
    three increasing materiality scenarios with
    questions to elicit the respondents moral
    evaluation and whistleblowing intentions.

7
Survey Cases
  • Case 1
  • Your boss has asked you to sign and submit a
    company purchase order he has prepared for a
    computerized software program, valued at 29.95
    that he wants to use to address his daughter's
    wedding invitations. Please rate the request of
    your boss by circling one number for each of the
    items below.

8
Survey Cases
  • Case 2
  • Your boss has asked you to sign and submit a
    company purchase order he has prepared for a
    laptop computer and portable printer, valued at
    1900. He wants to give this equipment to his
    son who is entering his first year of college,
    but the purchase order says it is to replace his
    perfectly good equipment. Please rate the
    request of your boss by circling one number for
    each of the items below.

9
Survey Cases
  • Case 3
  • Your boss has asked you to sign off on your
    department's annual performance report. When you
    look at the report the bottom line seems very
    low. You do some investigating and think that
    your boss has figured out a way to embezzle funds
    and transfer these funds to a Swiss Bank account.
    You estimate the amount to be 100,000. Please
    rate the request of your boss by circling one
    number for each of the items below.

10
Hypotheses and ResultsMateriality and Reasons
for Unethical Situations
  • H1 Accounting professionals are more likely to
    identify actions involving higher materiality
    values to be unethical.
  • H2 Accounting professionals will identify
    philosophical factors of justice, deontology,
    utilitarianism, relativism, egoism, and
    compassion as reasons an action is considered to
    be unethical.
  • H1 H2 were supported

11
More Reasons for Unethical and Whistleblowing
Intentions
  • H3 Accounting professionals will identify
    magnitude of consequences, social consensus,
    probability of effect, temporal immediacy,
    concentration of effect and proximity as reasons
    an action is considered to be unethical.
  • H4 Accounting professionals will be more likely
    to whistleblow for unethical actions involving
    higher materiality values.
  • H3 H4 were supported

12
More Reasons to Whistleblow
  • H5 Accounting professionals will identify
    philosophical factors of justice, deontology,
    utilitarianism, relativism, egoism, and
    compassion as reasons to whistleblow.
  • H6 Accounting professionals will identify
    magnitude of consequences, social consensus,
    probability of effect, temporal immediacy,
    concentration of effect and proximity as reasons
    to whistleblow.
  • H5 H6 were supported

13
Organizational Commitment and Cash Reward
  • H7 Accounting professionals who perceive that
    they are guaranteed anonymity are more likely to
    whistleblow on unethical actions.
  • H8 Accounting professionals who are offered a
    cash reward are more likely to whistleblow on
    unethical actions.
  • H7 was partially supported but H8 was not
    supported

14
Perceived Corporate Ethical Values of the
Employer and Employee Organizational Commitment
  • H9 Accounting professionals working for a firm
    with perceived corporate ethical values are more
    likely to whistleblow on unethical actions.
  • H10 Accounting professionals with high
    organizational commitment will be more likely to
    whistleblow on unethical actions.
  • H9 was partially supported, but H10 was not
    supported

15
Job Satisfaction and Ethics Code
  • H11 Accounting professionals with high job
    satisfaction are more likely to whistleblow on
    unethical actions.
  • H12 Accounting professionals perceiving that the
    ethics code at their organization will be
    enforced will be more likely to whistleblow on
    unethical actions.
  • H11 was not supported but H12 was partially
    supported

16
Job Guarantee and SOX Protections
  • H13 Accounting professionals who perceive that
    they are guaranteed their jobs are more likely to
    whistleblow on unethical actions.
  • H14 Accounting professionals perceiving adequate
    protections under Sarbanes Oxley are more likely
    to whistleblow on unethical actions.
  • H13 was partially supported, but H14 was not
    supported

17
Summary of Findings
  • Although philosophical beliefs and values are
    important for evaluating the reasons actions are
    either ethical or unethical, we find that the
    criteria for evaluating whether or not one would
    whistleblow often extend beyond ones
    philosophical belief systems.
  • Accounting professionals are more likely to
    whistleblow for situations involving higher
    materiality levels.
  • Accounting professionals are more likely to
    whistleblow if they are guaranteed their jobs.
  • As the materiality of the situation increases,
    guaranteeing ones anonymity became the most
    significant factor in the decision for practicing
    accountants to blow the whistle.
  • Offering a cash reward, job satisfaction,
    organizational commitment and perceptions about
    protections guaranteed by Sarbanes Oxley are not
    significant factors in the intention to
    whistleblow.

18
Implications for our Profession
  • Additional research is needed to confirm the
    attitudes of the sample of management accountants
    used in this study with larger samples
  • Support from companies and professional
    organizations are critical to encourage employees
    to report unethical or illegal practices
  • The authors gratefully acknowledge the IMAs
    research support
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com