Mecanismos de Fomento para a Previdncia Complementar - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Mecanismos de Fomento para a Previdncia Complementar

Description:

High Earners (Executives, Investment Bankers, etc.) Do Not Value Tax Deduction ... We Need Efforts in Education and Communication to Change Culture ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:16
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: william460
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mecanismos de Fomento para a Previdncia Complementar


1
Mecanismos de Fomento para a Previdência
Complementar
  • Alex Landsman
  • William M. Mercer
  • November 21, 2000

2
Major Issues
  • Tax and Legal Issues
  • Social, Economic and Cultural Challenges
  • Market Barriers
  • Logistical Problems

3
(No Transcript)
4
Tax and Legal Issues
  • Ideal Tax Treatment
  • Employer Contribution - Within Limits
  • Tax deductible to Employer
  • Not Taxable to Employee
  • Not Subject to Social Charges
  • Employee Contribution - Within Limits
  • Not Taxable to Employee
  • Not Subject to Social Charges

5
Tax and Legal Issues (cont.)
  • Ideal Tax Treatment (cont.)
  • Asset During Accumulation
  • Not Taxable to Employer
  • Not Taxable to Employee
  • Benefit Paid
  • Non Taxable to Employee

6
Tax and Legal Issues (cont.)
  • Ideal Tax Treatment is Not Common
  • Generally There Is One Point of Taxation
  • In the US usually when Benefit Paid
  • Some Exceptions
  • Employee Contribution to Defined Benefit (DB) and
    After - Tax Contribution to Defined Contribution
    (DC) Plans
  • Roth IRA

7
Tax and Legal Issues (cont.)
  • Tax Rate
  • Ordinary Income
  • Capital Gain
  • Dividend
  • Limits
  • Employer 20 of Compensation
  • Employee 12 of Compensation

8
Tax and Legal Issues (cont.)
  • Treatment of Superávit
  • Mandated Benefit Increases
  • Low Flexibility for Alternative Use
  • Post-Retirement Medical
  • Window Benefits

9
Social, Economic and Cultural Challenges
  • Low Coverage
  • US - 61.5 million
  • UK ? 17 million
  • Brazil ? 1.6 millions
  • High Social Charges
  • High Benefits from INSS
  • High Cost - Mandated Adjustment for Inflation
  • No or Low Union Pressure
  • Significant Informal Economy

10
Workers in the Formal Economy as of the Total
Workforce ( Annual Average )
Average Jan - Apr 1999
11
Target EU Wide Pension Pay-Out in 2020
2020 Target
Source Pragma Consulting
12
Social, Economic and Cultural Challenges (cont.)
  • Low Value Assign to Pension Plan
  • Significant Number of Employees Prefer Cash
  • Situation Is Gradually Improving
  • Bad past experience with montepios
  • High Earners (Executives, Investment Bankers,
    etc.) Do Not Value Tax Deduction
  • Low Highest Individual Tax Rate - 27.5

13
Social, Economic and Cultural Challenges (cont.)
  • We Need Efforts in Education and Communication to
    Change Culture
  • Significantly Underfunded Public Plans

14
Market Barriers
  • Limited Investment Options
  • Fixed Income - Short -Term Only
  • Equities - Highly Volatile
  • Real Estate
  • Foreign Investment not Permitted
  • In the US in addition
  • International Equities and FI, Venture Capital,
    Hedge Funds, Long-Term FI, etc.

15
Market Barriers (cont.)
  • High Cost of Investment Management
  • Resolution 2720 - Costly Reporting and Disclosure
    Requirements
  • Few Products Available
  • Insurance Market Is not Developed
  • Corporate Governance

16
Logistical Problems
  • Not Enough Pension Professionals
  • Development of Actuaries
  • Education of Current and Potential Plan Sponsors
  • Products
  • Financial Markets
  • Risk/Rewards
  • We Need More Cooperation Between Business and
    Academics

17
Logistical Problems (cont.)
  • Relatively Simple Plan Design
  • Generally DB or DC
  • Few Hybrid Plans
  • Few DC Plans with Investment Choices
  • Study Regarding Retirement Needs Should be
    Performed.
  • In the US Replacement Ratio Generally Considered
    to be 60 - 80 Depending on Income.

18
Public pension plan maximum replacement rates
and Pension Assets as a of GDP in 1996
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com