Product Development - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Product Development

Description:

Active: failure of one parallel component - the second still works ... Elevator safety margin~2. Medical devices Fries - .5 and up. Load Protection ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: paulh8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Product Development


1
Product Development
  • Chapter 6

2
(No Transcript)
3
Hardware Software Techniques
  • Block diagram the system (Visio)
  • Redundancy
  • Active failure of one parallel component - the
    second still works
  • Standby failure of component replacement
  • MTBFmean time between failures 1/?
  • Active MTBF3/(2?)
  • Standby MTBF2/?

4
MIL-HDBK-217
  • Where to get ??
  • Google MIL-HDBK-217
  • For example, see www.sqconline.com/reliability/ind
    ex.html
  • Try wire wound resistor in a missile

5
Component Selection Considerations
  • Component reliability
  • Vendor assessment (Hx, failure, etc.)
  • Vendor audit (check facility)
  • Vendor evaluation (inspect incoming)
  • Vendor qualification (on-list?)
  • Component history
  • military reliability groups
  • government info bases
  • Safety (FMEA, etc.)

6
Hardware Software Techniques ctd.
  • Component Derating
  • Practice of limiting the stresses
  • Use 2 watt R in 1 watt situation, decrease
    failure rate gt30 (T, humidity, P, V, I,
    friction, vibration)
  • Usage ratio max stress/stress rating (.5-.9)
  • Goal is reliability!
  • Pacemaker example

7
Hardware Software Techniques ctd.
  • Safety Margin
  • (mean safety factor) - 1
  • (mean strength/mean stress) - 1
  • Elevator safety margin2
  • Medical devices Fries - .5 and up.
  • Load Protection
  • Environment (see 112)
  • Product misuse
  • Design for variation (6 sigma)

8
Experimental Design
  • Statistical Approach
  • Effective approach for multivariable situations
  • Taguachi method
  • Design Process
  • System design
  • Parameter design
  • Tolerance design
  • Two types of variables
  • Control factors
  • Noise factors

Apply this to design
9
Software Development and Engineering Management
  • Planning for safety (FDA!)
  • Planning for risk assessment
  • Planning for method
  • Waterfall
  • Incremental delivery
  • Spiral
  • Cleanroom
  • Code and fix,

10
Software Development and Engineering Management
  • Choose design method
  • Top-down
  • Data driven
  • OOP
  • Language (Assembler/C/Qbasic etc.)
  • Testing
  • Requirements
  • Hazard Analysis!!! (FDA)

11
Software Development and Engineering Management
  • Requirements traceability (FDA)
  • Software architecture design
  • Well defined modules (logical)
  • Other vendor standalone
  • Single purpose modules
  • Cohesion coupling
  • Implementation (coding)
  • Integration

12
Structured/Unstructured Design Techniques
  • Computer/database assisted
  • Ideation - Innovation Workbench
  • TRIZ
  • Techoptimizer
  • Others
  • Example done in class, another in text

13
Axiomatic Design
  • Nam Suh, MIT
  • Requirements, design parameters, process
    variables, customer needs vectors
  • Try to solve, disassociate functional
    requirements and design parameters
  • Highly mathematical
  • Acclaro Software

14
Reverse Engineering and Redesign
  • Opportunities increase with age of technology
  • Disassembly of product and inventory and analysis
    of parts
  • Allows for the potential update or modification
    of the parts with technological advances
  • Can drastically increase productivity or
    effectiveness in a dated product

15
Design Techniques
  • Very structured approach
  • Pahl and Beitz, Engineering
  • Design
  • Design method contains 8
  • distinct steps
  • Semistructured
  • Wilcox, Engineering Design for Electrical
    Engineers
  • Ulrich and Eppinger Product Design and
    Development

16
The Clean-Room Approach To Reverse-Engineering
  • One person or group takes a device apart and
    describes what it does in as much detail as
    possible at a higher level of abstraction than
    the specific code. That description is then given
    to another group or person who has absolutely no
    knowledge of the specific device in question.
    This second party then builds a new device based
    on the description. The end result is a new
    device that works identically to the original but
    was created without any possibility of
    specifically copying the original.
  • -Mathew Schwartz

17
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com