Challenges and Threats in Large Scale Biometrics Deployment in Europe Findings and recommendations f - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Challenges and Threats in Large Scale Biometrics Deployment in Europe Findings and recommendations f

Description:

Identify the main challenges for biometric deployment in Europe: ... Ink on paper & flatbed scanner (AFIS) Type of second biometric sensor ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: pc67211
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Challenges and Threats in Large Scale Biometrics Deployment in Europe Findings and recommendations f


1
Challenges and Threats in Large Scale Biometrics
Deployment in EuropeFindings and
recommendations from results of IPTS Biometrics
Deployment Study
James GoldsteinStudy manager, Cybion Srl
2
Agenda
  • Objectives
  • Study Phases Target
  • Mapping
  • Questionnaire
  • Survey results
  • Findings/Conclusions

3
Objectives of our study
  • Collect information on and summarize the present
    state of biometric deployment in Europe.
  • Identify the main challenges for biometric
    deployment in Europe
  • technical (e.g. false rejection rate, failure to
    enrol, )
  • related to standards and interoperability
  • economical
  • social (e.g. low acceptance)
  • legislative
  • Propose areas that should be explored in order to
    solve or alleviate existing or potential problems
  • Put together results and options for policy
    making

4
Expected results
  • Contribute to a better understanding of the
    existing challenges affecting large-scale
    deployment of biometric systems in public use
  • Help the consistent adoption of biometric
    technologies, taking into consideration
    advantages and threats.
  • Provide a European deployment map of all relevant
    large-scale biometrics solutions

5
Study Phases
Conference
Survey Status of biometric deployment
Biometric Expert Group
Decision makers at EU level
Testing and Evaluation
Security and Privacy
Expert meeting
Challenges
Deployment status
In the project
After the project
6
Target
  • Size of applications
  • 10.000 users enrolled
  • Deployers involved
  • Public sector (government, border control)
  • Secondary target Commercial
  • Geographical
  • Developed only in EU Member States

7
Mapping
  • Detailed European map of biometrics systems,
    including names and contact addresses of the
    institutions involved
  • Browseable by country, technology, application

8
Mapping
9
Profile page example
10
Questionnaire
  • Distributed to 60 participants
  • Addressing overall project target
  • Provided by e-mail, telephone, personal visits
  • 12 returned

11
Basic Information (1)
12
Basic Information (2)
13
Basic Information (3)
14
Basic Information Analysis
  • Main application domains ID and travelling
    documents (e-passport, ID-cards,VISA), law
    enforcement (AFIS, DNA), access control (incl.
    registered passengers)
  • Number of users ID and travelling documents are
    the largest
  • Types of biometrics
  • Finger most-widely spread, used in all domains,
    used for identification and verification
  • Face ID/travelling, law enforcement (plans to
    include face-recognition), used for verification
  • Iris registered passengers, used for
    verification
  • DNA law enforcement, used for identification
  • Palmprint law enforcement, used for
    identification
  • Trend towards multi-modality

15
The main driversWhy the system has been
developed
Rank from 0 (not relevant) to 5 (very relevant)
16
The main drivers Analysis
  • Security most important driver for all domains
    except registered passengers
  • Convenience most important driver for registered
    passengers
  • Save costs important for AFIS, less important
    for ID/travelling registered passangers
  • Fulfill agreements important for ID/travelling

17
Performance data claimed by manufacturer
18
Performance data based on practical observations
and comments (1)
19
Performance data based on practical observations
and comments (2)
20
Performance dataAnalysis
  • Error rates not enough data for meaningful
    comparisons available
  • No reported execution of standardised tests
  • Problem Definition of error rates within AFIS
    (i.e police enrols all arrestees, manual
    verification of matches by human expert), very
    different transaction times between
    tenprint/tenprint latent/tenprint searches
  • Time Transaction times satisfying

21
Standards and interoperability (1)
22
Standards and interoperability (2)
23
Standards and interoperabilityAnalysis
  • Referred standards are well-known
  • New ISO SC37 standards are not referred
  • Technical information is in large part
    confidential
  • Information exchange is intended especially
    within law enforcement systems

24
Token, if applicable
25
Token, if applicableAnalysis
  • Answers are from access systems
  • No answers form e-Passport systems

26
Biometric database, if applicable (1)
27
Biometric database, if applicable (2)
28
Biometric databaseAnalysis
  • Database Available data is from manufacturer of
    access system, no data disclosed by large scale
    deployers (e.g. AFIS)
  • Encryption of transmitted data Is used by AFIS
    (e.g. TESTA network within Prüm-Treaty)

29
Biometric sensor
Biometric sensor 2, if applicable (in multimodal
systems)
30
Costs (all fields are optional)
31
Legal, organizational and data protection issues
) (1)
32
Legal, organizational and data protection issues
) (2)
33
Legal, organizational and data protection
issuesAnalysis
  • Owner of biometric data depends on application
    area (e.g. AFIS police, card based access
    systems / reg. Pass. customer)
  • User access to data sometimes possible (e.g.
    reg. Passengers), sometimes must be prevented
    (AFIS)
  • Data sharing within law inforcement systems is
    mostly possible (in consideration of nat. laws)

34
Challenges and Future Plans
35
Survey Results
  • Survey achieved only a snapshot
  • Stakeholders are not forced to provide reliable
    information to Commission and EU Member States
  • Experts' opinions and other sources (interviews)
    contributed to a broader picture

36
Findings/Conclusions
  • Applications of interest
  • Law enforcement, passports, access control
  • Preferences of biometric data
  • Fingerprint, face, iris and DNA
  • Performance and error rates
  • Must be seen in context with user environment
  • Europe-wide integration
  • On right path with law enforcement and passports,
    but not yet completed

37
Next steps
  • Publication of Deployment Status Report
  • Publication of Final Report that incorporates all
    relevant results from
  • Questionnaire
  • Expert Group
  • Seminar
  • Priority list of challenges/threats to large
    scale biometrics deployment to be revealed in
    Final Report

38
THANK YOU!
CONTACT INFORMATION James GoldsteinCybion
SrlVia Della Scrofa, 117Rome, Italy 00186 TEL
39 06-6865975FAX 39 06-68806997E-mail
goldstein_at_cybion.it
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com