Title: Should Canada Continue To Maintain Combat-Capable Air Forces?
1Should Canada Continue To Maintain
Combat-Capable Air Forces?
- Colonel
- Bill Cleland
- Wing Commander
- 4 Wing Cold Lake
- 18 March 2002
2Presentation Outline
- Introduction
- Common Security and Pacifistic Ideals
- Are Some Wars Just?
- Defending Canadian Sovereignty
- Collective Security
- Canadas Contribution to International Peace and
Security - Conclusions
- Questions/Discussion
3Common Security
- From his 1990 book, Howard Peter Langille states
that - The essence of common security is that security
for one nation can only be enhanced by increasing
the confidence and security of allThe key
elements of the common security approach are to - Develop international confidence
- Exercise national self-restraint in military
affairs - Emphasize cooperative over competitive security
planning - Promote the common good rather that the pursuit
of short-term national interests
4Just War Principles
- War can be decided upon only by legitimate
authorities - War may be resorted to only after a specific
fault or to restore what has been wrongfully
seized - The intention must be the advancement of good or
the avoidance of evil - In a war, other than one strictly in
self-defence, there must be a reasonable prospect
of victory - Every effort must be made to resolve differences
by peaceful means before resorting to the use of
force - The innocent shall be immune from direct attack
- The amount of force used shall not be
disproportionate
5Pacifisms Ethical Dilemma
- As Hare and Joynt stated in 1982
- If absolute pacifism rules out all violence and
killing, this must be because people have a right
not to be made the victims of violence or
killing but if someone has this right, then we
must have the correlative obligation to use
whatever means are necessary to secure that he is
not made a victim of violence or killing since
sometimes the only means available will be
violence or killing, it would seem that absolute
pacifism sometimes requires the use of the very
means it rules out.
61994 White Paper on Defence
- The current White Paper on Defence states that
there is no immediate direct military threat to
Canada however it claims that modern
combat-capable armed forces are necessary for
three reasons - Prudent levels of military force must be
maintained to ensure Canadian sovereignty in
peacetime - Deterrence, if it is to be credible, relies on
minimum combat capabilities capable of generating
larger forces if significant conventional threats
re-emerge - Canada relies on collective security in time of
war
7Definition of Sovereignty
- As defined in the Canadian Encyclopedia
- A states sovereignty is projected in its legal
control of territory, territorial waters and
national airspace, and its legal power to exclude
other states from these domains.
8UN Charter Chapter 7 (Collective Security)
- Article 39
- The UN Security Council has the authority to
determine the existence of any threat to the
peaceor act of aggression - Article 42
- Should the Security Council consider that
measures provided for in Article 41 would be
inadequate or have proved to be inadequate, it
may take such action by air, sea, or land forces
as may be necessary to maintain or restore
international peace and security - Article 51
- Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the
inherent right of individual or collective
self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a
Member of the UN until the Security Council has
taken measures necessary to maintain
international peace
9UN and the Use of Military Force
- In 1996 the Under-Secretary of the UN (Marrack
Goulding) listed the following six purposes for
which the UN has recently authorized the use of
military force - Restore or maintain international peace or
security - Enforce sanctions imposed by the Security Council
- Defend the personnel of peacekeeping operations
- Provide physical protection to civilians in war
situations - Protect activities intended to relieve the
suffering of civilians - Restore or maintain peace and security in an
internal conflict.
10When Should the UN Authorize Military Force?
- According to Marrack Goulding (writing in 1996),
the following four conditions should be met - There should be a clear political commitment on
the part of the Security Council and the
troop-contributing countries that they are
determined to prevail against any opposition - The force should have an evident military
superiority over the forces of any protagonist
which might challenge it - Military forces should be absolutely impartial
and should be ready to use force against any
party which obstructs humanitarian deliveries or
violates an agreed cease-fire - The force should have no other mandate at all in
relation to the conflict in question
11Canadas Commitment to UN Missions
- In 1994, in an address to the General Assembly of
the United Nations, the Canadian Foreign Minister
(The Hon Andre Ouellet) confirmed Canadas
commitment to the Secretary-Generals new
missions stating that - The international community cannot remain
indifferent to the conflicts that threaten the
lives of millions of innocent people and expose
them to the worst violations of their most
fundamental rightsSome people are tempted to
give up and wonder if the United Nations is wrong
in trying to resolve essentially domestic
conflicts that have numerous complex causes.
Canada does not share this opinion
12Operation Deliberate Force
- In 1997, in an article in Survival, Gregory
Schulte concluded that - Operation Deliberate Force achieved its objective
when, after three weeks of air attacks, the
Bosnia Serb leadership agreed to cease offensive
operations and remove all heavy weapons in the
Sarajevo exclusion zone to allow unimpeded
access to the city by road and by air, and to
formalize a cessation of hostilities. The
operations also helped to re-launch the peace
processby showing that the international
community was prepared to back diplomacy with the
effective use of military force.
13NATO Operation Allied Force
- In 1999, in the face of horrific ethnic cleansing
of Kosovar Albanians by the Serbs in Kosovo,
there was no realistic expectation that NATO or
any other international grouping could move
sufficient land forces into the area in a timely
manner - NATO launched a major air campaign in an attempt
to stop the ethnic cleansing - The Canadian contribution was significant
14Canadian Contribution to Operation Allied Force
- From an article in the Canadian Military Journal
in 2000 entitled Mission Ready Canadas Role in
the Kosovo Air Campaign - For every mission flown and every bomb dropped, a
Canadian Forces legal officer examined the
assigned target very carefully with regard to its
legitimacy and relevance to Canadian and
international legal standards.In addition, the
pre-mission planning process for each bombing
attack took into account the stringent
requirement to avoid collateral damage.If at any
time during the actual bombing attack the pilot
was either uncertain about the target itself, or
if he was concerned about the potential for
collateral damage, he was under very clear
instructions to abort his mission and bring his
bombs home. This happened on many missions.
15Has Air Power Come of Age?
- The air campaigns in the Gulf and in Yugoslavia
showed that modern technology has finally made it
possible to be militarily effective while
complying with international law regarding
non-combatant immunity and proportionality - International peace movements should be
encouraged by the fact these conflicts were
conducted with diligent reference to, and
determined application of, just war principles in
spite of clearly illegal actions by the enemy,
such as placing command centres in schools, and
parking military equipment near private homes,
religious shrines and hospitals
16Why Should Canada Contribute to UN Missions?
- As Marc Milner reminded us, in 1994, in an
article entitled Defence Policy for a New
Century - Only a relative few countries Canada among them
possess armed forces with the high standards of
training and professionalism, and the skills
required to operate advanced technology weapons
effectively.
17Beliefs of Western Peace Movements
- I believe Michael Howard correctly summed up the
beliefs of Western peace movements in the
following quotation in 1987 - I think that what has gone wrong with peace
movements and could go wrong with peace studies,
if they are not very careful, is that they are
still to a large extend based on the eighteenth
century rationalist assumption that there is an
underlying harmony of the world, if only one
could reach it that conflict is something
unnecessary, arising from extraordinary
pathological conditions that conflict is a
disease on which we must focus our attention
that peace is the normal state of societies, and
as we develop appropriate techniques, as in
medicine, for curing the war disease, then all
will be well.
18 Conclusions
- The waging of defensive continues to be just.
- Canada must maintain combat-capable armed forces
for the foreseeable future to - Act as the ultimate guarantor of Canadian
sovereignty in peacetime - Make a meaningful contribution toward the defence
of North America in co-operation with the United
States in time of war - Honour Canadas collective security
responsibilities as a founding member of both
NATO and the UN
19Questions / Discussion