Title: Steel Orbis: Steel Trade Conference
1Steel Orbis Steel Trade Conference (Session 2
Trade Matters and Legislation) North American
Steel Industry Challenges
Thomas A. Danjczek President Steel Manufacturers
Association San Diego, CA July 11, 2008
2Outline
Steel Orbis Session 2
U.S. Competitiveness China - Comments -
Chinese subsidies - Chinese interference with
raw materials - Auto parts - Circular
welded steel pipe Regulating GHGs Conclusion
3Steel Orbis Session 2
Competitiveness
U.S. - China Steel Future Competitiveness Drivers
Driver U.S. China Comment 1.
Metallics Weak 1/2 imported Technological
(Availability/Price) Scrap exports Freight dev
elopments to U.S. 2. Energy Gas/electric
ity to China Climate change (Availability/Pric
e) constraints policy Limited
nuclear 3. Labor Lack of technical to
China Health care costs 4.
Transportation to U.S. 5. Trade to
China Growth of steel- intensive
goods 6. Environment to U.S. Enforcement?
4Chinas Trade Surplus with the U.S.
Steel Orbis Session 2
Year Chinas Trade Surplus 2001 22
billion (year China joined WTO) 2006 177
billion 2007 262 billion (up 47.7)
The U.S. has lost 3.3 million manufacturing jobs
since 2000 imbalances cannot go on forever.
5Steel Orbis Session 2
Impact of AD/CVD
Percent of the value of Chinese imports covered
by AD/CVD duties?
2004 0.13 2006 0.10
(TAD comment What Protectionism?)
International Trade Commission, based on U.S. DOC
and Customs official statistics
6Steel Orbis Session 2
China Steel Comments
- China has NOT become the worlds largest steel
producer by accident, or by operation of free
markets, or comparative advantage - China is NOT a low-cost steel producer
- China has reached its position through a
combination of subsidies, mandates, and planned
intervention - In finished goods containing steel, Chinas
exports are expanding by approximately 30 percent
per year - Chinese steel market is still reliant on exports
to absorb overproduction - Chinese steel industry is overbuilt and
under-demolished
7China Continues to Interfere with Raw Material
Markets
- Chinas steel policy mandates such interference
- Article 28 Mineral resources belong to the
state - Article 30 The state will encourage large
Chinese producers to construct production supply
bases of iron ores, chrome ores, manganese ores,
nickel ores, scrap steel, and coking coal in
foreign countries - Article 30 The state will use its power to
prevent cut-throat competition among Chinese
mills for raw materials - Article 30 The export of coke, iron alloy,
cast iron, scrap steel, and steel billet . . .
shall be restricted. - Examples of how China restricts critical exports
- Metallurgical coke
- Ferroalloys and other nonferrous metals
- China has subsidized domestic iron ore
production, as well as foreign ventures created
to obtain iron ore from abroad.
8Case Study China Has Supported Auto Parts
Production in Many Different Ways
- WTO-prohibited subsidies
- Transfer technology requirements
- Five-year plans
- Government ownership of auto parts producers
- Preferential financing for auto parts producers
- Research and development incentives
- Restrictions on imported auto parts
9U.S. Imports of Auto Parts and Vehicle Bodies
from China
Source AISI
10U.S. Indirect Steel Trade Balance with China
Automotive Sector
2001
2002
2003
2005
2006
2000
2004
Source AISI
11Recent WTO Case Regarding Auto Parts
- Involves a local content regulation 25 percent
surcharge on imported auto parts for any car that
does not comply - This regulation violated Chinas 10 percent bound
tariff rate on imported auto parts - February 2008 WTO issued preliminary ruling
against China - Case does nothing about other forms of government
support for Chinas auto parts industry
12AD/CVD Circular Welded Steel Pipe from China
Steel Orbis Session 2
- On June 20, 2008, ITC - final injury determinant
- - Duties 69.2 to 75.5 for antidumping
- 29.5 to 615.9 for counter civilian
duties (Average subsidy rate of 37.2)-
Event First time CVD on steel product from
China- Numbers See next graph - Background Filed on June 7, 2007- DOC
Preliminary on November 5, 2007, with margins at
0 to 26.4 (Avg 16.6)- Final on May 29, 2008,
with margins at 69.2 to 75.5 - Conclusion U.S. producers will not allow this
industry to be undercut by unfair subsidies
13(No Transcript)
14Regulating GHGs Trade Perspectives
Steel Orbis Session 2
- Acting unilaterally creates significant potential
for trade and investment distortions (carbon
leakage) - North American production cutbacks are a bad
compliance mechanism - - Environmental and economic lose/lose
- Medium to longer term requires comprehensive
global sectoral approach - Until global approaches are in place, N.A. needs
to level compliance cost obligations - - Border measures to avoid loss of
competitiveness
15Steel Trade and Environment Perspectives
Steel Orbis Session 2
- Developing countries gt90 global GHG rise since
1990 - Canada, US, EU, Japan committed to or considering
significant short-term GHG reduction mandates - India not committed to action Russia? Brazil?
China? - Steel sector approx 4 of global GHGs
- - China over 50 of GHGs, and growing
- - North American steel lt0.5 of total global
GHGs High rate of recycling lowest steel
emitters - Steel will continues to grow globally
- - 3-5 percent in total 8-10 percent in China,
India, Russia - - Could be 3 billion tonnes by 2050 (vs. 1.2
bT in 2007) -
16Climate Change Policy Overview U.S.
Steel Orbis Session 2
- Congress considering cap and trade
- - Unlikely to pass before 2009
- - Lieberman-Warner most likely basis
- Both Presidential candidates support some form of
cap and trade system - Various state-level plans inconsistent
- Some momentum for global sectoral agreement
- Industry Position
- - Recognize current-day technology limits and
time to develop/deploy/diffuse new technologies - - Supports global sectoral agreement
- - If cap and trade, then
- Carbon intensity standard verifiable
- - Apply to all domestic and imported steel
sold in U.S. - Credit/exemption for recycling and process
emissions
17Conclusions
- China, China, China (Anything else is an
embellishment) - More CVDs against China are coming
- Doha talks must not be used to weaken trade laws.
- Need strong and effective enforcement of trade
laws throughout the NAFTA region - Need a more effective approach to dealing with
market-distorting practices in China. - Need to monitor raw material situation to ensure
that market forces operate properly.