CATO INSTITUTE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

CATO INSTITUTE

Description:

... mailing a check for the gas tax you would have paid if you had used your car? ... Major role for freight. Mobility. Private. Personalized. Technological fix ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: alan340
Learn more at: http://ti.org
Category:
Tags: cato | institute

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CATO INSTITUTE


1
CATO INSTITUTE
  • The Right Road for America
  • Alan E. Pisarski

2
NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION POLICY 101
  • PLEASE BUY CARS we need to stimulate jobs in a
    weak economy
  • BUT WAIT!
  • PLEASE DONT USE THEM. They create Green House
    Gases and bad stuff. We have to coerce people out
    of their cars (maybe we could use them for lawn
    ornaments?)
  • BUT WAIT!
  • If they dont use them there will be no gas tax
    revenue and no way to fund the transit that
    people will need after we force them from their
    cars.
  • Would you mind mailing a check for the gas tax
    you would have paid if you had used your car?
  • Please make payable to US Treasury!

3
--THE NEXT REAUTHORIZATION --THE PRESENT IMPASSE
IS NOT NEW
  • Whenever there is no money the talk is about
    federal roles and policy
  • Whenever there is no money the talk turns to
    being innovative!
  • When the money shows up the talk stops we all go
    home and go to work
  • IF THE CONGRESS PASSED A 10 (or 5) a gallon gas
    tax we would call it a plan

4
Next Reauthorization
  • Finance, Finance, Finance
  • Stimulus package a factor
  • Tolling, congestion pricing disliked by
    leadership but few options
  • More afraid of gas tax increases
  • Is private sector still ready with
  • Devolution by Default ??

5
Next Reauthorization
  • Maybe reorg DOT away from modes to functional
    structure intercity metro
  • Metro mobility transit, bike, walk
  • Intercity HSR, tourism weak
  • Performance Based
  • New focus on land use policies
  • Embrace Coercion!

6
SOME HISTORY
  • Most histories mark 1956 as the start of the
    Interstate actually the Interstate idea
    predates WW II.
  • 1956 is the date that the funding plan was set in
    place by Congress.

7

The Interstate story begins with a sketch by FDR
in 1937
8
Refined throughout the war years
9
THE FUNDING CONCEPT
  • The system was to be funded by user charges
    paid into a Trust Fund
  • The fundamental principle
  • Users should pay for their use of the system AND
    government should dedicate the funds to the care
    and improvement of the roads users ride on.
  • The entire concept, which has very effective
    controls built in, is being lost RAPIDLY!

10
(No Transcript)
11
We also got
  • A system capable of attracting support
  • -- And repelling diversions
  • The flag-ship of the national program
  • Now no such flag ship program exists
  • And it shows in the 3 interim reauthorizations
    since 1991
  • A funding system without a clear national purpose

12
ARE WE ON THE CUSP OF A NEW ERA?
  • End of the Post-Interstate Interim?
  • Start of the what?
  • The Post-Post-Interstate Era!
  • A Crisis of Goals A Crisis of Finance or just
    the usual problems?
  • Congress believes there is no problem so big it
    cant be run away from!

13
THE PERFECT POLICY STORM?
  • Time of Intense Need for
  • Time Of Intense Anti-auto, Anti-mobility Plans
    and Policies
  • Time Of Strong Policy Cover by Pricing Theory
  • Result
  • Punitive Pricing in a Good Cause.
  • Decline of User Fee cornerstone to funding
  • Cash-Cow-ification of Tolls and User Fees
  • Few things are as frightening as when government
    can be seen to be doing good by taxing something.

14
Issues with publics choices
  • Too much transportation spending
  • Low income are transportation poor
  • Transportation trade-off with housing loses
  • Job sprawl a problem
  • We all must come home to the center city
  • Is the public coerced by circumstances or just
    making dumb choices?
  • Is this serious and real or just reauthorization
    hype?

15
TWO REACTIONS TO 4 GAS
  • BOO !
  • Less VMT social and economic interactions lost
  • Now is the worst time to be cutting economic
    activity
  • HURRAY!
  • Schadenfreude!
  • Those suburbanites had it coming!
  • At last we are at the Tipping Point
  • Now there will be a rush to the city center of
    people and jobs

16
What am I defending ?
  • I am defending the personal vehicle/road system -
    where the owner determines when and where it goes
    and who goes along!
  • I am not defending the internal combustion engine
    or any particular motive power!
  • The term Personal Vehicle is right Personal
    vs Mass!

17
Does the personal vehicle need defending? It
doesnt seem like it!
  • The public doesnt think so.
  • All trends support the personal vehicle.
  • In 40 years of commuting we added 66 million
    commuters and 70 million auto users!
  • The auto wins the market debate but not the
    policy debate

18
WHAT OF TRAVEL IS FRIVOLOUS?A congressional
question to me 1979People travel for rational
reasons
  • All trips have an economic or social transaction
    at their end of value to the traveler (and to
    Society)
  • If your transportation goals can be met by
    everyone staying home RETHINK YOUR GOALS!

19
Slow Decay of User Principle
  • Spending
  • Transit share
  • Enhancements
  • Earmarks
  • Local Needs
  • High Speed Rail
  • Revenue
  • 8 billion Trust Fund bailout
  • 6 billion Trust Fund bailout
  • 26 billion future bailout

20
PROTECT THE FED USER FEE
  • not only are we likely to be in the twi-light
    between gas taxes and in-vehicle pricing for a
    long time it is good that we will be in that
    twi-light for a long time. AEP
  • The Post-Gas Tax Era is not yet! (20yrs?)
  • We must prepare for it but continue to defend
    what we have.
  • 1.7 billion per penny still has the power to
    attract sharks.

21
As long as Congress has the power to tax gasoline
it must be dedicated to highway needs
  • That sets the upper limit on fuel fees.
  • Without dedication there is no upper limit on
    federal gas tax (see any European country).
  • Feds very efficient tax collector hire them?
  • Continued diversion ends support for new fees.
  • There is no way to assure no federal gas tax
    Firewall and RABA are the best we have!
  • Let the gas tax dwindle? Fit the program

22
The policy conflict opposed thinking about the
world
  • Neighborhood
  • Shorter trips
  • Walk/bike
  • Land use solutions
  • Design
  • Whats freight?
  • Accessibility
  • Public
  • Mass
  • Behavior change
  • Make it happen
  • Globally Integrated
  • Longer trips
  • Broad community
  • Choices
  • Market forces
  • Major role for freight
  • Mobility
  • Private
  • Personalized
  • Technological fix
  • Let it happen

23
The focus on changing behavior diverts us from
the real issues
  • Enhancing Economic Opportunities
  • Access To Workers Access To Jobs
  • Mainstreaming Minorities
  • Improving Safety
  • Serving An Aging Population
  • Greater Freedom Of Mobility
  • Infrastructure Reconstruction
  • More!

24
Summing up threats opportunities
  • Threats
  • Policies to penalize
  • Dispersed jobs
  • Dispersed households
  • Policies to promote
  • Higher density
  • Organized society
  • Subsidies to
  • Recentralize
  • Promote density
  • Opportunities
  • Jobs moving closer to skilled workers
  • Increased mobility
  • Promote greater job access
  • Live where you want work where you want

There is no fear they will succeed but the waste
in time and will be disastrous
25
THANK YOU
  • alanpisarski_at_alanpisarski.com

26
WE HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO CARE GREATLY ABOUT
TRANSPORTATION!
  • Transportation is all about reducing the time and
    cost penalties of distance on our economic and
    social interactions.
  • To the extent that nations succeed in that
    function they enable tremendous forces of
    economic opportunity, social cohesion and
    national unity.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com