Title: Imagery for the Nation
1Imagery for the Nation
Vicki Lukas, U.S. Geological Survey February 23,
2009
2IFTN Phase 1 Project Goals
- Accomplish a few near-term steps to move existing
Federal programs towards IFTN goals while
developing a more comprehensive plan for IFTN - Document Federal imagery requirements and
expenditures - Begin to institutionalize imagery funding move
from the tin cup approach of project-based
funding to reliable funding at the executive
level - Model a process for Federal enterprise geospatial
data acquisition efforts - Complete Phase 1 by end of calendar year 2008
(new timeframes being developed to adjust to
ExCom guidance and transition)
3Phase 1 Outcomes
- Accomplish a few near-term steps to move existing
imagery programs towards IFTN goals - NAIP Institutionalize funding
- STATUS MOU between USDA and DOI in work
- Urban Area Imagery Broaden the requirements and
planning process - STATUS Being addressed as part of
high-resolution strategy
4Phase 1 Outcomes
- Draft a more comprehensive plan for implementing
IFTN across the Federal enterprise in partnership
with state and local government
- STATUS - DRAFT Plan was presented to the ExCom in
December - Executives provided additional guidance on
high-resolution strategy and governance
5IFTN Project Structure
Acting Chair Karen Siderelis DOI (FGDC Chair)
Project Manager Vicki Lukas USGS
Technical Plan
Funding Strategy
Contracting Strategy
Hosting and Archiving
Partnership Strategy
Guidance and Direction
Communi-cation Strategy
Executive Champions (FGDC Executive Committee)
Jerry Johnston Acting EPA
Karen Siderelis Acting DOI
Stephen Lowe USDA
Steve Wallach NGA
Joe Klimavicz DOC
Dominic Sale OMB
Chuck Gay NASA
Kari Craun USGS Geoff Gabbott USDA
Doug Binnie USGS Kent Williams USDA
Shirley Hall USDA Jim Mauck USGS
Vicki Lukas USGS
John Mahoney FGDC
Pat Phillips FGDC
TBD DOI
Chairs
6Work Group Activities
7High-Resolution Strategy
- FGDC Steering Committee approved ExCom
recommendation to remove Federal funding for 6
imagery and offer it as a buy-up option of the
high-res component - ExCom guidance is to develop a process that would
retain flexibility to meet evolving needs and
avoid acquiring data by default where few
requirements may exist - ExCom directed the Technical Plan work group to
define a process and initial criteria for
prioritizing Federal requirements for
high-resolution imagery - Process can be used regardless of funding levels
and can be piloted to fulfill Outcome 1 goal to
improve high-resolution coordination with
existing funding
8Original IFTN Vision
9Governance Preliminary Concepts
- ExCom supports establishing an IFTN governance
body to include a representative delegated by
each agency to authoritatively report
requirements and specific justifications - Incorporate FGDC 50 States/imagery plans into the
process ensure an open and transparent process
and forum to align Federal and State priorities - Annual priorities recommendation would be
presented for discussion/approval by the
governance body to the ExCom - ExCom tasked Technical Plan Work Group to
coordinate with the National Digital Orthophoto
Program (NDOP) regarding the role of the IFTN
governance body as a sub-committee of the FGDC - NDOP agreed to formalize the relationship by
modifying the charter to become a FGDC
sub-committee - Align with other FGDC sub-committees regarding
charter
10Private Industry Capacities for IFTN
- Contracting Strategy Work Group (CSWG) worked
with ASPRS to determine the number of aircraft
and cameras available to commit to the IFTN
initiative out of 109 surveyed, 45 responses
received, representing a 41 response - A request for information (RFI) was sent out to
the major satellite companies to obtain
information about their capabilities to meet the
IFTN requirements - CSWG concludes without reservation that adequate
capacity and expertise to implement a program of
the size and scope of IFTN is available - Recommend exploring license uplifts or other
solutions for meeting IFTN needs via satellite
data
11DRAFT Contracting Strategy
- Both Best Value and Qualifications Based
Selection (QBS) procurement can be used
effectively in the acquisition of quality
orthoimagery products the decision rests with
the Federal Contracting Officer - Sealed bidding (low bid) should not be used
evaluation criteria based on technical merit
should be the primary basis for selection - An integrated approach should be considered, to
maximize airborne and satellite image
acquisitions and processing capacities - Draft strategy and issues to be presented to
ExCom at 3/10 meeting
12Next Steps
- Continue refining high-resolution and governance
strategies - Looking at how to refine the plan for Alaska
- Present contracting strategy to ExCom at March 10
meeting for review and guidance - Present hosting and archiving strategies to ExCom
next - Outreach to incoming executives
- Develop new timeframes for completion of Phase 1
- Enhance Funding Strategy and Communications
- Plan for Federal and NGAC reviews
- Provide detailed overviews to community via WebEx
13(No Transcript)
14THANK YOU