More Stereotyping, Prejudice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

More Stereotyping, Prejudice

Description:

People will favor members of the ingroup even when the grouping is silly ... Is this person's behavior because I am black/gay/etc. or not? (Crocker et. al, 1991) study ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: jeffrey97
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: More Stereotyping, Prejudice


1
More Stereotyping, PrejudiceDiscrimination
  • June 28th

2
The Motivational Perspective
  • Competition is not necessary for intergroup
    conflict
  • Economic perspective is not the whole story
  • People will favor members of the ingroup even
    when the grouping is silly
  • Minimal group paradigm- Experiments where group
    membership is knowingly assigned through a
    meaningless or arbitrary process

3
Results of those studies
  • Participants favor their own group
  • Despite that they never met never will
  • This favoritism is often strong enough to
    motivate focusing on relative vs. absolute gain
  • Economists (and Jeff) would call this irrational
  • Take-home message small or arbitrary differences
    can cause discrimination

4
Another theory to remember
  • Why do we treat us better than them?
  • Social Identity Theory (SIT)
  • Identity self-esteem draw not only from aspects
    accomplishments of the self, but also from
    those of groups to which one belongs.
  • RU!

5
Predictions of SIT
  • Because our esteem is dependent on status of
    ingroup, we boost group status via in-group
    favoritism
  • Remember that many judgments are relative, so
    putting another group down is also effective
  • Discrimination in the MGP results in higher
    self-esteem
  • People associate more strongly with group when
    group is doing well
  • Basking in reflected glory

6
Frustration-Aggression Theory
  • Frustration leads to aggression
  • Aggression can not always be expressed at source
    of frustration, so it is displaced to a target
    with low status
  • Boss frustrates John
  • John yells at son Jimmy
  • Jimmy kicks the dog
  • Lynchings and the price of cotton1883-1930

7
Outgroup Derogation Self-Esteem
  • Fein Spencer (1997)
  • State self-esteem measure
  • IQ Test Participants either tested poorly or
    tested well (bogus feedback)
  • Inspect application packet watch videotape of
    interview
  • Julie Goldberg or Marie DAgostino
  • Rate applicants personality
  • State self-esteem measure

8
Esteem Threat Recovery
9
The Cognitive Perspective
  • People are cognitive misers
  • They will avoid expending mental energy unless
    they really need to
  • Also, conscious, deliberate thought is a limited
    resource (people have limited self-regulatory
    resources)
  • According to this perspective, stereotypes are
    useful cognitive categories that allow us to
    process information efficiently
  • So does using stereotypes help us conserve our
    mental energy?

10
Improved accuracy on both tasks
11
Construal Bias
  • Greater perceived similarity among members of a
    group
  • Outgroup homogeneity effect similarity is
    greater among members of a given outgroup than
    ones own ingroup
  • We notice remember stereotype-consistent events
    behaviors, and generally forget inconsistent
    behaviors
  • Schema/stereotype helps us fill in the gaps
  • Stereotypes influence our construal of ambiguous
    behavior was it play or aggression?
  • Self-fulfilling prophesies our expectations lead
    us to act in ways for those expectations to be
    confirmed
  • Uncomfortable interviewers make for poor
    interviewee performance
  • illusory correlations unusual acts by unusual
    people suggest a correlation between the two more
    easily than when the type of person or action is
    more common
  • Professors driving Prius

12
Inaccurate Stereotypes
  • How do stereotypes persist in the face of
    disconfirming evidence?
  • Dismissal as exceptions
  • Subtyping
  • Attitude-maintaining attentional biases
  • Biased attributions

13
Automatic Controlled Processes
  • Behavior that is consciously controlled tends to
    be in line with conscious, explicit attitudes
  • Behavior that is less under conscious control
    tends to be in line with implicit attitudes
  • Dovidio et al. (2002)
  • Explicit Implicit attitudes assessed,
    conversations with a white black student
    videotaped
  • Videotapes scored once with sound on, once with
    sound off
  • Difference in friendliness w/ sound predicted by
    explicit attitude, difference in friendliness w/o
    sound predicted by implicit attitude
  • Stereotypes are more likely to be acted upon when
    cognitively busy or rushed

14
Stereotype Videogame
Shot when they shouldnt have
Failed to shoot when they should have
15
Being a member of a stigmatized group
  • Attributional ambiguity
  • Is this persons behavior because I am
    black/gay/etc. or not?
  • (Crocker et. al, 1991) study
  • Stereotype threat
  • The fear that you will confirm the stereotype
    that others have about a salient group to to
    which you belong
  • Performance tends to be worse under conditions
    of stereotype threat
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com