Title: AOA CONFERENCE FUTURE EUROPEAN AVIATION REGULATORY SYSTEM
1AOA CONFERENCE FUTURE EUROPEAN AVIATION
REGULATORY SYSTEM
- Presentation by
- Ray Elgy
- Head of Aerodrome Standards
- Civil Aviation Authority
2OVERVIEW
(1) The need for CLARITY OF ROLES (2) The
need for CO-OPERATION (3) The need to
PLAN FOR SUCCESS
3(1) THE NEED FOR CLARITY OF ROLES
- Many players in Europe ICAO, States (EU and
non-EU), the Commission, Parliament, NAAs, EASA,
Eurocontrol, and all parts of a diverse aviation
industry - Failure to clarify roles and communicate
these will inevitably lead to - uncertainty about responsibility (and liability)
- potential gaps in safety oversight
- duplication of effort
- inconsistency between objectives
- friction between organisations
- delays, costs and confusion for those regulated
- loss of reputation for regulators
SAFETY
4Areas of change where we need to ensure Clarity
of Roles
-
- EASA/NAAs
- Objectives of Single European Sky
- Structure and Functions of Eurocontrol
- Economic Regulation
-
5EASA / NAAs
- Legal demarcation of current functions clear
- EASAs focus remains solely on safety
- Need to establish how best to deliver EASAs
services Working with NAAs, Assessment Bodies
etc. - UK CAA supports progressive centralisation of
rule-making and effective standardisation EASAs
key activities
6EASA / NAAs - continued
- But must take account of complexities in civil
ATM regulation, and linkages between airspace
design and safety (including military airspace
users) - Application of rules must be at national level
unless compelling economic/industrial arguments
for centralisation - Those who will apply rules and supervise
their implementation must be fully
involved in developing them
7Objectives of Single European Sky
- Aim was to increase capacity and reduce delays,
whilst improving safety - Need to evaluate progress, prioritise objectives,
and reflect on how best to achieve them - Avoid over- prescriptive regulation and
acknowledge obligations which only States can
perform - Build on existing infrastructure initiatives
through SESAR - Develop SES concepts and initiatives to drive
forward efficiency gains.
8Structure and Functions of Eurocontrol
- Separation of pure service provision
- Support to EU regulator - clearly separated from
support to service provision activities as
required by industry - Focus for civil/military co-ordination, at least
for time being - Greater involvement of industry users in
decision-making - Recognition of Member States legal rights and
obligations under Chicago Convention and SES
9Economic Regulation
- How much economic regulation is needed at EU
level? - YES to high level principles and objectives BUT
Member States have different aviation operating
environments, legal systems, levels of regulatory
experience and expertise and so need different
ways of meeting common objectives in different
circumstances - Regulatory transparency, allied with peer review,
often sufficient to protect users and promote
efficiency - Comply with Better Regulation principles,
including regulatory impact assessment before
making changes
10(2) THE NEED FOR CO-OPERATION
- Joined-Up Regulation
- Many different players in Europe
- Many different aspects of aviation regulation
- Safety
- Security
- Airspace design
- Technical harmonisation
- Economic
- Consumer Protection
- Environment
11THE NEED FOR CO-OPERATION Being Joined-Up -
continued
- Users suffer if there are gaps/overlaps,
inconsistency, or confusion - Must guard against unintended consequences,
especially on safety - Where regulation is in different organisations,
there must be pro-active co-ordination between
them (possible example of Civil and Military ATM
safety regulation and airspace design)
12THE NEED FOR CO-OPERATION (b) Partnership
- Complexity of regulatory structures and of
industry requires genuine partnership between
regulatory bodies - recognising that no one party has a monopoly of
wisdom or valid ideas - sharing information, expertise, advice and
assistance (particularly between those who make
the rules and those who implement / supervise
them) - working together to find collective solutions
- EASA is not just an Agency, it is a System
- Commission, Member States, Agency, NAAs,
Industry
13(3) THE NEED TO PLAN FOR SUCCESS
- Clarity of Roles Co-operation already
emphasised - The need to Manage Change Effectively
- The need for Sound Governance
- The need for Industry to prepare
14THE NEED TO PLAN FOR SUCCESS The need to
Manage Change Effectively
- The changing of the EU regulatory system is a
- complex, demanding task, requiring
well-organised, - hands-on change management programmes, with very
clear objectives. Accordingly we need - adequate planning and preparation time
- to avoid diluting safety standards
- care to recruit / retain scarce manpower
resources - stable funding arrangements
- mechanisms for meaningful engagement with all
- stakeholders
15THE NEED TO PLAN FOR SUCCESS- The need for Sound
Governance
- All regulatory and regulated organisations must
have sound governance arrangements, i.e. clear
identification of - where responsibility and accountability lie
- who will participate in key decision-making
- who is able to review the organisations
strategies, plans and progress in an effective
way - how objectives, resources and funding will be
brought together - how the organisation will listen and respond to
the views of stakeholders
16THE NEED TO PLAN FOR SUCCESS - The need for
Industry to prepare
- Establish maintain effective communications
with EASA NAAs. - Develop the expertise necessary for Industry to
support EASA effectively in the development of
rules. - Contribute to the development and effective
prosecution of a credible transition plan.
17OVERVIEW
- The need for CLARITY OF RULES
- The need for CO-OPERATION
- The need to create CONDITIONS FOR SUCCESS
- 4. The need for a credible ACTION PLAN - NOW
18AOA CONFERENCE FUTURE EUROPEAN AVIATION
REGULATORY SYSTEM
- Presentation by
- Ray Elgy
- Civil Aviation Authority