Towards a Research Agenda for Official Statistics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Towards a Research Agenda for Official Statistics

Description:

Hidden under the harmonization label. Generic to ESS but comes out as an 'add on' ... and should be standardized (harmonized)? How to achieve procedural ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:15
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: scbl9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Towards a Research Agenda for Official Statistics


1
Towards a Research Agenda for Official Statistics
  • Lars Lyberg
  • Statistics Sweden
  • ETTS 2009 Brussels
  • February 18-20, 2009
  • Email lars.lyberg_at_scb.se

2
The current scenario
  • An overwhelming number of initiatives
  • 150 ESS RD groups (advisory, coordination,
    executive boards, expert, working, organizing
    committees, round table, steering, technical,
    task forces)
  • Problems with priorities, finishing off, and
    implementation

3
Examples of initiatives
  • A mixture of traditional methodological areas and
    more visionary ideas
  • Traditional areas confidentiality, nonresponse,
    small area estimation, harmonization, response
    burden
  • More visionary ideas model-based statistics,
    combining data from different sources, more
    efficient collaboration models such as ESSnet,
    standardization and evaluation efforts such as
    rolling reviews, Code of Practice, LEG on
    Quality, the new Regulation

4
So what is lacking?
  • A concerted effort
  • A project prioritization process based on
    strategic goals for the ESS
  • Recognizing risks
  • Involving the stakeholders even more
  • Taking care of all links in the statistics
    production process (i.e. more on
    conceptualization, response process, measurement
    errors, quality control)
  • Systematic implementation and evaluation of best
    practices

5
Anything more that is lacking?
  • The systematic division of labour
  • NSIs have similar challenges
  • NIPS, CENEX, ESSnet, sharing results
  • Capacity building (ESS competence development)
  • Cooperation with universities and agencies
    world-wide
  • Standards

6
A dogs breakfast
7
Having said that..
  • Admittedly the general conditions are difficult
    and vary a lot
  • The total openness about ESS problems is
    admirable
  • Considerable persistence and success in some work
    areas
  • Lots of work laid down on
  • Subject-matter
  • Methodology
  • Strengthening the role of official statistics
  • Quality
  • Stakeholder dialogue
  • Lots of recommendations provided

8
Lets go back to the ESS basics
  • ESS shall provide reliable, comparable statistics
    for EU decision making, monitoring and evaluation
  • Eurostat shall ensure that methods, criteria and
    practices within ESS are as harmonized as
    possible and statistics as comparable as possible
  • NSIs and MSs shall provide national data and
    technical expertise and advice
  • Implicit is that production should be efficient

9
How central are these dimensions in ESS RD work?
  • Reliable should probably read accurate
  • Small errors
  • Stable processes that deliver what they are
    supposed to
  • Important error sources left behind
  • Comparative
  • Hidden under the harmonization label
  • Generic to ESS but comes out as an add on
  • Efficient production
  • Central in many RD projects

10
Accurate data
  • Do not leave any key processes behind
  • Develop and/or apply standard operating
    procedures (SOP) (quality assurance)
  • Validate process performance (quality control)
  • Allocate assurance and control resources with a
    risk management perspective
  • Quantify total survey error (TSE)
  • How should TSE be interpreted in a comparative
    setting?
  • Resources outside ESS TSE workshop, other
    specialized networks and conferences, SOPs and
    guidelines

11
Comparative issues
  • What could and should be standardized
    (harmonized)?
  • How to achieve procedural equivalence?
  • How to adjust concepts so that we get a uniform
    meaning across countries?
  • How should differences in funding and methodology
    resources be handled?
  • How should national pride and conflicts of
    interest be handled?
  • Resources outside ESS CSDI network, guidelines
    for comparative research published by U o
    Michigan and CSDI

12
Controlling Quality
13
Hypothetical project priority matrix
14
Matrix use
  • Project ideas submitted
  • Each project suggestion scored by
    10x110x210x39x4..5x9
  • Scoring is done by project management group
  • Rolling RD plan
  • Projects executed in ranking order

15
Endnote
  • More search for and use of what is already
    available
  • Continue the work on simplified coordination
  • Collaborate globally
  • The new Regulation should be operationalized such
    as Article 10 European statistics shall be
    developed, produced and disseminated on the basis
    of uniform standards and of harmonized methods
  • Emphasize the comparative aspect of ESS
  • Implementing best practices
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com