Building and Enhancing Capability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Building and Enhancing Capability

Description:

Strategic importance of the barriers to transfer and replication of knowledge ... new knowledge (technology) Breakthrough ... Integrating specialists' knowledge ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: abfreeman
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Building and Enhancing Capability


1
Building and Enhancing Capability

2
Capability
  • Role of knowledge in value-added
  • Creating knowledge
  • Managing knowledge
  • Explicit and tacit
  • Strategic importance of the barriers to transfer
    and replication of knowledge

3
Creating capability
  • Acquisition of capability
  • Sourcing new knowledge (technology)
  • Breakthrough improvement (BPR)
  • May not lead to a learning organization
  • Learning
  • Continuous and incremental process improvements
  • Learning by doing in-house
  • New system not very different from the existing
    one
  • RD
  • Continuous as well as breakthrough
  • High uncertainty and high investment
  • Product commercialization

4
Operations capability
  • Creating value through
  • Transformation of inputs to outputs
  • Fulfillment
  • New business models
  • Efficiency through
  • Performing discreet repetitive tasks (learning
    curve)
  • Waste reduction
  • Technology and processes
  • Integrating specialists knowledge
  • Surgeons, anesthetist, radiologist, technicians
    coordinating in performing a surgery

5
Individual/collective
  • Individual learning
  • Learning by doing
  • System-learning
  • Learning before doing
  • Self-improving systems
  • Flexibility (individual vs. system)
  • Innovation
  • Individual or collective?

6
Learning curve
  • Tn is the time to complete the nth item, T the
    time for the first item, and ? the rate of
    learning
  • The time required to perform a task decreases as
    the task is repeated (n increases)
  • The amount of improvement decreases as more units
    are produced, and
  • The rate of improvement has sufficient
    consistency to allow its use as a prediction
    tool.

7
Entry barrier
  • Lack of experience producing a product or service
    can be a significant barrier to market entry
  • Learning loss in switching between
    products/processes
  • Changes in product or processes may also disrupt
    learning
  • Lost learning may make it uneconomical to sustain
    variety (e.g. multiple sourcing)

8
Vertical integration
  • Balancing units with different characteristics

9
Benefits of vertical integration
  • Economics of integration
  • Access to technology
  • Assure supply and/or demand
  • Enhance bargaining power
  • Enhance ability to differentiate
  • Raise entry barriers

10
Cost of vertical integration
  • Cost of overcoming mobility barriers
  • Reduced flexibility to change partners
  • Higher overall exit barriers
  • Higher capital investment requirements
  • Maintaining balance
  • Dulled incentives
  • Different management skills requirement

11
Capability creation process
  • Work method
  • Creating a new process for invoicing
  • A better sequencing of jobs
  • Coordination
  • Improvements in ERP type systems
  • Eliminating bottlenecks
  • Technology
  • Technology that makes current processes more
    efficient (laser cutting tool)
  • Technology that redefines processes (bar code
    readers, FMS)

12
Processes for improvement
  • Training
  • Focused teams
  • Management processes (QR, JIT, TQM)
  • Organization-design change
  • Prototypes and pilot plants
  • Benchmarking

13
Matching improvement needs
14
Hierarchy of capabilities
  • Cross functional
  • New product development, customer support
  • Functional
  • Operations, RD, MIS, marketing
  • Activity related
  • Manufacturing, quality assurance
  • Specialized
  • PCB assembly, order processing, loan approval
  • Single-task
  • Surface mounting, soldering

15
Complexity of knowledge integration
  • Increases with the span of knowledge
  • Joint ventures
  • Require integration across broad spans of
    knowledge
  • Difficult to transfer knowledge from foreign
    operations
  • Cross functional teams are challenging to manage
  • Quick response is difficult to achieve
  • involves integrating across multiple stages

16
Mechanisms of integration- Explicit knowledge
  • Assimilation of knowledge
  • Knowledge representation
  • Storage and retrieval
  • Knowledge access
  • Codifying knowledge using advanced IT

17
Mechanisms of integration - Tacit knowledge
  • Direction
  • Operations manual, standardized work rules
  • Performance specifications for complex activities
  • Aircraft service and repair involving multiple
    locations
  • Involves knowledge loss
  • Organizational routines
  • Patterns of stimulus and response
  • Commonly understood roles of team members through
    implicit signals
  • Patterns of interaction among specialists in
    surgery appear automatic

18
Characteristics
  • Integration of knowledge, rather than just
    knowledge itself
  • Serve the market needs efficiently
  • Specialized knowledge
  • Transferable between firms?
  • Appropriated by the possessor, not the firm
  • Proprietary knowledge depreciates quickly through
    obsolescence

19
Efficiency of integration
  • Accessing and utilizing the specialist knowledge
    held by individuals
  • Commonality of vocabulary, concepts, and
    experience
  • Common knowledge leads to social networks, and to
    organizational culture
  • Frequency and Variability of tasks
  • Frequency of coordination improves signaling
  • Greater the variation in routine, lower is the
    integration
  • 1992 LA riot was hard to control as riots are
    infrequent
  • Structure
  • Economize the amount of communication required
  • Bureaucratic structures can maximize integration
  • High integration is achieved in JIT by reducing
    communication
  • Modularization of operations (Function or
    product)

20
Scope of integration
  • Breadth of knowledge
  • Variety of knowledge
  • Complements not substitutes
  • Increasing marginal revenue of knowledge
  • Diminishing relevance with variety
  • Replication of knowledge
  • Increase in ambiguity makes it harder to
    replicate
  • Different types of knowledge may require
    different patterns of integration
  • Integration of knowledge, related to flexibility,
    is more complex than that related to cost
    efficiency (Toyotas lean production )

21
Flexibility of integration
  • Decreases efficiency in knowledge integration
  • Accessing additional knowledge
  • Communicability of knowledge (explicit/tacit)
  • Boeing extension of common CAD language in
    electronics to design the 777 aircraft.
  • GMs experience of encompassing Toyotas lean
    production (tacit) was painful
  • Reconfiguring existing knowledge
  • Benetton reconfigured its supply chain for quick
    response capability
  • Starbuck reconfigured the coffee value chain
  • Continuous reconfiguration?

22
Deploying capabilities
  • Internally neutral
  • Use external experts to solve operations problems
  • Stop holding the organization back
  • Externally neutral
  • Adopts best industry practices
  • Internally supportive
  • Operations concerns are recognized in business
    strategy
  • Be the best in the industry
  • Externally supportive
  • Redefine the industrys expectations (innovations
    and practices)
  • Viewed as a strategic resource, an equal partner
    in formulating business strategy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com