Poseidons Fury - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

Poseidons Fury

Description:

Carbon Fiber Gear. 3g load. Max Tensile Stress 22.2 ksi. FOS = 2.0. Weighs 0.43 lbs ... Low Reynolds Number (105) Lift Coefficient 1.2. Lift to Drag Ratio 5 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: student152
Category:
Tags: fury | poseidons

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Poseidons Fury


1
Poseidons Fury
AIAA Student Design Build Fly Electric Airplane
Kristina Morace Jonathan Moore Ryan
Holmes University of Central Florida
2
Outline
1. Required and Desired Features 2. General
Design Overview 3. Drain and Structural
Analysis 4. Aerodynamics and Flight
Performance 5. Propulsion System 6. Summary
3
Aircraft Features
  • Required
  • R/C Electric powered
  • 5 lbs max NiCad batteries
  • 4 liters max payload
  • 0.5" max drain orifice
  • Complete 2 missions
  • Pass wing tip tests
  • 4' x 2' x 1' box
  • Desired
  • Carry 4 liters
  • Drain Time 30 sec
  • Lift capacity 25 lb
  • Flight Stability
  • Battery weight 3 lb
  • High pitch speed
  • Low RAC

4
Rated Aircraft Cost
RAC (300MEW 1500REP 20MFHR)/1000 where
MEW Empty Weight REP Battery Weight
MFHR Component Summation Total Score
Written Report Flight Score RAC
5
Aircraft Overview
- Wing span 9.5 ft - Length 5 ft - Height
28 in
6
Drain System
- Custom 4 liter tank - Custom ball valve
7
Main Fuselage
Inner-wing
5th Bulkhead
- 7 Bulkheads - Inner-wing - 5th bulkhead
8
Landing Gear
- Tricycle Configuration - Carbon Fiber -
Detachable
9
Twin Booms
- Carbon Fiber - Detachable
10
Wing Sections
- Secure booms - Bolt to inner wing - Detachable
11
Inverted V-tail
- Pins into booms - Detachable
12
Powerplant
- Motor - Batteries - Spinner - Propeller
13
Aft Cone
- Twists on/off - Access to electronics
14
(No Transcript)
15
Drain System
16
Valve Design
  • Good seal
  • Actuate in flight
  • True ½ inch orifice
  • Manufactured using stereolithography
  • Drain Coefficient
  • Between 0.6 - 1.0
  • Actual 0.8
  • Drain time 55 sec

17
Tank Design
  • Holds 4 liters
  • Baffles
  • Modified Geometry
  • Predicted drain time
  • 32 seconds
  • Actual Drain time
  • 30 seconds
  • 45 reduction!

18
Wing Spar
5th Bulkhead
19
Wing Spar
  • Laminate ply
  • 2 layers of carbon fiber
  • 4 attach points
  • Built to support full load 20 lbs

20
Spar Analysis
  • Wing Tip Test
  • Symmetric
  • 10 lb load at tip
  • Max stress 27.9 ksi

Max Stress 27.9 ksi
21
Landing Gear Analysis
  • Aluminum Gear (661-T6)
  • 3g load
  • Max Von Mises 20.6 ksi
  • FOS 1.9
  • Weighs 0.75 lbs
  • Carbon Fiber Gear
  • 3g load
  • Max Tensile Stress 22.2 ksi
  • FOS 2.0
  • Weighs 0.43 lbs

22
Aerodynamics and Flight Performance
23
Aerodynamics Goals
  • Low Reynolds Number (105)
  • Lift Coefficient gt 1.2
  • Lift to Drag Ratio gt 5
  • Low Camber
  • Low RAC

24
Aerodynamics Test Verification
Predicted
Test
25
Aerodynamics Airfoil
  • Eppler 216
  • Exceeds Needs
  • CL,max 1.4
  • (L/D)max 22
  • Problem
  • Thickness to Chord Ratio Too Small
  • Design 10.4
  • Need 12.5

26
Aerodynamics Airfoil
  • Eppler 216 Modified

Modified
E216
27
Aerodynamics Airfoil
  • Eppler 216 Modified

28
Aerodynamics Wing
9.5
AC 25 of Chord
CG 25 of Chord
10.5
29
Aerodynamics Empennage
Actual Path
  • Inverted V Configuration
  • Pro-verse Yaw Characteristics
  • Aircraft Score Rewards

Ideal Turn
30
Aerodynamics Empennage
  • Inverted V Configuration
  • Pro-verse Yaw Characteristics
  • Aircraft Score Rewards
  • Twin Boom Configuration
  • No Ground Strike
  • Robust and Modular

31
Aerodynamics Empennage
Angle Between Panels 110 deg.
28
7.5
32
Flight Performance
The Difference Longitudinal Stability
33
Performance Phugoid Stability
Period 14 minutes Flight Characteristics
Level 2
34
Performance Short Period Stability
Period 21.5 s Flight Characteristics Level 1
35
Performance Stability
  • Pilot Rating (Cooper-Harper Scale)
  • 1st Flight resulted in a 5
  • Poor Roll control from Adverse Yaw
  • Aileron Differential Added
  • Poor Ground Handling
  • Corrected Steering Control

Remaining Flights are a 1
36
Performance Flight Testing
37
Performance Flight Testing
38
Performance Flight Testing
39
Propulsion System
40
Propulsion System
  • Nomenclature
  • System Requirements
  • Predicting Outputs
  • Testing
  • System Integration
  • Safety Features

41
Nomenclature
  • Energy Density
  • Sanyo 1700 mA-hr
  • A size Ni-Cad battery
  • Sanyo 2400 mA-hr
  • C size Ni-Cad battery

36 cells
32 cells
3 lb
5 lb
  • Rated Aircraft Cost (RAC)
  • Rated Engine Power (REP)
  • Manufacturer's Empty Weight (MEW)

42
System Requirements
  • Take-Off
  • Thrust gt 4 lbf
  • Speed gt 30 mph
  • Distance lt 150 ft
  • Steady Level Flight
  • Thrust gt 1 lbf
  • Minimize RAC

43
Predicting Outputs
  • ThrustHP Calculator Software
  • Inputs
  • Propeller
  • Diameter
  • Pitch
  • RPM
  • Outputs
  • Pitch Speed
  • Static Thrust

44
Testing Schematic
Stroboscope
Spring Scale
Multimeter (Voltage)
External Power Source
Multimeter (Current)
Speed Controller
Radio Transmitter
Current Divider
45
Testing
Thrust Sled
46
Test Results
Minimum Thrust
47
Test Results
32 C batteries
Minimum Pitch Speed
48
Propulsion Results Summary
  • 33 reduction in MEW and REP
  • First 3 minutes
  • 6 lbf Static Thrust
  • 47 mph Pitch Speed

49
Propulsion Integration
50
Propulsion Safety Features
  • Kill Switches
  • 40 Amp Fuse
  • PCM Receiver
  • Air Scoops

51
Summary
  • Satisfies all competition requirements
  • carries 3 lbs of batteries
  • passes loaded wing tip test
  • takes off in 132 ft
  • easily fits into box
  • Contains all desired features
  • carries 4 liter payload
  • drains in 30 seconds
  • minimized RAC
  • Successfully completes loaded and unloaded
    missions

52
Acknowledgements
  • Team Members
  • Michael Denton
  • Craig Daniels
  • Underclassmen
  • Advisor
  • Dr. Eric Petersen

53
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com