Nation Building - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Nation Building

Description:

US led military operation - CENTCOM. NATO participation and command of ISAF ... Military operation has assumed State-like functions (CPA) Paul Bremmer, CPA ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: valuedg518
Category:
Tags: building | nation

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nation Building


1
Nation Building
  • Are we built to build nations?

2
Nation Building a Dirty Word?
  • Stability Operations
  • A partnership to establish or reestablish the
    institutions essential to democracy and good
    governance.

3
Whos in Charge?
  • United Nations
  • Coalition or Regional Security Organization
  • The United States

4
Why Here and not There?
  • Inherently a Political Decision
  • What is the impact on United States interests?
  • Security
  • Economic
  • Historic and Cultural
  • Humanitarian Intervention
  • Ideology

5
Who Decides?
  • The President
  • National Security Council
  • The Presidents key advisors in all matters
    relating to national security.

6
National Security Council
  • Vice President
  • Assistant to the President for National Security
    Affairs
  • Secretaries of
  • State
  • Defense
  • Treasury
  • Director of Central Intelligence (intel advisor)
  • Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (military
    advisor)
  • Others, as required

7
Department of State
  • Create a more secure, democratic, and prosperous
    world for the benefit of the American people and
    the international community
  • Lead Federal Agency Foreign Affairs
  • Anything having to do with the international
    community
  • Lots of expertise, limited resources

8
Department of State
  • Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs
  • Political Affairs
  • Regional Bureaus
  • Arms Control and International Security
  • Economics, Business, and Agriculture
  • Global
  • Counterterrorism

9
USAID
  • US Agency for International Development
  • The experts in building capacity
  • Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA)
  • Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI)

10
Department of Defense
  • To provide the military forces needed to deter
    war and to protect the security of the United
    States
  • Roles
  • Warfighting
  • Humanitarian Assistance
  • Peacekeeping
  • Evacuation
  • Homeland Security

11
Department of Defense
  • Office of the Secretary of Defense
  • Joint Staff
  • Regional Combatant Commands
  • Special Operations Command
  • Lots of resources and enthusiasm

12
Military Services
  • Army
  • Navy
  • Marine Corps
  • Air Force

13
Stability Operations
  • Special Operations Command
  • Special Operations Forces
  • Special Forces (Green Berets)
  • SEALS
  • Special Operations Aviation
  • Psychological Operations
  • Civil Affairs
  • Conventional Forces

14
State vs. Defense
  • Political nuance
  • Seeing all sides
  • Inclusiveness
  • Discussion/dialog
  • Revisiting options
  • Ability to reach out
  • Multi-faceted approach
  • Decisiveness
  • Goal oriented
  • Focused
  • Mission driven
  • Planning expertise
  • Unilateral action

15
Department of Justice
  • Judicial systems
  • Rule of Law
  • Federal law enforcement
  • Law enforcement training

16
Department of Treasury
  • Financial systems
  • Multilateral financing for reconstruction and
    development

17
Department of Homeland Security
  • Key skill sets essential for a stable and secure
    environment
  • Coast Guard
  • Border and transportation security
  • Infrastructure Protection
  • Immigration

18
Central Intelligence Agency
  • Training and equipping of security forces
  • Intelligence
  • Whats going on?
  • Who are the important players?
  • Security threats

19
Other Important Agencies
  • Department of Labor
  • Department of Agriculture
  • Department of Health and Human Services
  • Department of Commerce
  • Department of Energy
  • Environmental Protection Agency

20
Wheres Congress?
  • Funding money makes policy a reality, otherwise
    its just wishful thinking
  • Authorities (who can do what and what can we do
    with the money)
  • The curse of narrowly defined authorities
  • Title 10 and Title 22
  • Armed Services, Foreign Relations Committees

21
Other Players
  • United Nations
  • World Bank and International Monetary Fund
  • Other State partners
  • Regional organizations
  • Security alliances
  • Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs)
  • Charities
  • Interest groups

22
What about the People?
  • The nation we are trying to build is a wreck for
    a reason
  • War and conflict
  • Ethnic divisions
  • Religious strife
  • Refugees and migration
  • Famine, environmental degradation
  • No Rule of Law
  • What do we build?

23
National Security Council Staff
  • Brings this all together
  • Orchestrating the Interagency
  • No authority to direct to action
  • National Security Council
  • Deputies Committee (DC)
  • Policy Coordinating Committees (PCC)
  • Ad hoc Interagency working groups
  • Functional and regional agency working groups
  • Establishing legitimacy

24
Bureaucracy (Not a dirty word)
  • All designed to give solid policy guidance and
    advice to the President based on the consensus
    of multiple disciplines and perspectives
  • Pro
  • Balanced view from all perspectives
  • Results in a coordinated, focused US government
    effort
  • Coordinated Interagency approach usually has the
    highest probability of long-term success
  • Con
  • Slow vulnerability to rice bowl stalling,
    disruption
  • Low risk, low payoff

25
Bureaucracy
  • Without a coordinated interagency approach
  • Lack of Unity of Command
  • Agencies prone to working at cross purposes
  • Agencies duplicate efforts
  • One particular agencys perspective may dominate
  • Consequently alienating other agencies
  • Legitimacy or lack thereof

26
Lead Federal Agency
  • Most things State
  • Military Operations Department of Defense
  • Combating terrorism overseas none of the above

27
So Whos in Charge?
  • Deciding whos in charge has a profound impact on
    our approach.
  • It may be that we never resolve this issue
  • Unity of Command
  • Unity of Effort
  • Ability to lead
  • Ability to follow

28
Defining Success
  • When can we leave?
  • Who is in charge when we leave?
  • Differing perspectives of Democracy
  • Economic stability and prosperity
  • Legal institutions and the respect for the rule
    of law
  • A state the abides by the norms of respectable
    international behavior

29
How Have We Done?
  • Our track record isnt particularly good
  • We dont play well with others
  • We want to be in charge or we dont play
  • We change our minds and our priorities on a whim
  • Reasonably constant across administrations
  • We do well managing the family of nationstates

30
Case Studies
  • Somalia
  • Sierra Leone
  • Afghanistan
  • Iraq

31
Somalia
  • Black Hawk Down
  • Who was in charge?
  • UN humanitarian mission
  • Alleviated the conditions of starvation
  • In the process strengthened the warlords
  • US in control of its military forces
  • Minimal presence (for political reasons) meant no
    access to key weapons systems
  • Unable to stabilize the security environment

32
Sierra Leone
  • Historical ties to the UK
  • UN peacekeeping mission
  • British military intervention to establish a
    stable security environment
  • State lead
  • Working through ECOWAS
  • Providing them the tools and training to
    establish stability
  • USAID played a key role
  • Office of Transition Initiatives

33
Afghanistan
  • US led military operation - CENTCOM
  • NATO participation and command of ISAF
  • Security environment is reasonably stable
  • Allows infrastructure development
  • Resources have been made available to do what
    needs to be done
  • Sovereign government in charge
  • Legitimacy

34
Iraq
  • Whos in charge? Whats the primary mission?
  • Initial planning reflected the military nature of
    the operation the Defense worldview
  • Military operation has assumed State-like
    functions (CPA)
  • Paul Bremmer, CPA
  • Iraqi Governing Council
  • CENTCOM
  • SOCOM

35
Iraq
  • Success at the micro level
  • Individual units and people
  • Military Police
  • Civil Affairs
  • Found wanting at the macro level
  • Unrealistic assumptions, deadlines, objectives
  • No clear lines of authority and responsibility
  • Underfunding the construction of a new state
  • Inability to build a substantive coalition

36
Future Challenges
  • Coordinating US efforts
  • Including other partners
  • Willingness to follow
  • Identifying and committing the necessary
    resources
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com