Public Funding - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Public Funding

Description:

Public Funding. Douglas Rutzen. International Center for Not-for-Profit Law ... of organizations engaged in fraud, misconduct, false or misleading statements in ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: drut
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Public Funding


1
Public Funding
  • Douglas Rutzen
  • International Center for Not-for-Profit Law

2
Context Magnitude of Funding
  • France
  • 4 billion
  • England
  • Lottery proceeds 2 million per day for good
    causes
  • Hungary
  • 750 million
  • 4.85 of state budget channeled to NGOs in 2004
  • 36.4 of total income of the sector
  • Macedonia
  • 4 million in 2007 alone

3
Illustrative Challenges
  • Hungary State Audit Office Report 2001 and 2002
  • 80 of funding by the government allocated on the
    basis of individual decisions
  • 50 of public foundation support provided without
    a grant announcement
  • Slovakia 1998-2002 65 of public funding
    awarded non-competitively
  • No central data source/lack of info on funding
  • Lack of uniformity every announcement had
    different rules
  • Ministries failed to hold grantees accountable

4
Strategic Vision
  • Because of time and information constraints,
    programs are often developed on an ad hoc basis
  • Need for Strategic Planning (Hungary)
  • EuropeAid Project Cycle Management
  • Identify problems, constraints and
    opportunities which development cooperation could
    address.
  • The purpose is to identify the main objectives
    and sector priorities for co-operation
  • - Goal of Tender (Service Delivery, Research,
    Advocacy, New Capacity, etc.)
  • For each of these priorities, strategies that
    take account of the lessons of past experience
    are formulated.

5
Strategic Vision
  • Ministries, Academics, Members of Parliament, NGO
    representatives (but remember limitations of
    elite structures)
  • Dont forget beneficiaries
  • Competitive Review
  • Assess potential competition for sector estimate
    costs determine the most appropriate method for
    procurement

6
Illustrative Forms of Support
  • Contracts
  • Principal purpose is the acquisition of property
    or services for the direct benefit or use of the
    government
  • Grants
  • Principal purpose is the transfer of money,
    property, or services to accomplish a public
    purpose,
  • and the recipient has substantial freedom to
    pursue its stated program

7
Illustrative Forms of Support
  • Vouchers
  • Per Capita Fees
  • Loans and Loan Guarantees
  • Access to State Property (offices,
    videoconference facilities, etc.)

8
Eligible Bidders
  • Positive Rules
  • Should certain tenders be reserved exclusively
    for NGOs?
  • Should NGOs be required to be in existence for a
    certain number of years?
  • ?Look to goal of tender (project funding,
    development funding, strategic funding)
  • Negative Rules Should there be blacklisting
    of organizations engaged in fraud, misconduct,
    false or misleading statements in bids, etc.

9
Decision-Maker
  • Entity May Drive Nature of Support
  • Parliaments Cant Easily Contract with
    organizations rather give budgetary support.
  • Centralized/Decentralized
  • Homogenization of Themes
  • Accessibility and Accountability
  • Role of Outside Experts
  • Not necessarily representatives/different roles
    (priorities, strategies, evaluation, etc.)
  • Croatia
  • Vouchers (beneficiaries decide)

10
Selection Criteria and Process
  • Options
  • Qualifications
  • Current and Past Experience with Similar Projects
  • References
  • Professional, Managerial, and Financial
    Competence of the Organization and Personnel
  • Innovation and Replicability
  • Price
  • Factors that cannot be considered (advocacy or
    political activities?)
  • Hungarian National Civil Fund Generally open to
    public unless closed to protect personal rights
    or competitive information.

11
Mechanics
  • One or Two Stage Process
  • Written Responses to Bidders, including those not
    successful.
  • What documents should unsuccessful bidders have
    access to (other bids, rating sheets, etc.)
  • Access by members of public/media?
  • Ability to declare information confidential?
  • Review and Challenge

12
Duration of Agreement
  • Much statutory funding of groups has
    heretofore been provided on an ad hoc annual
    basis. This does not allow groups to plan ahead.
    It also means that considerable time and energy
    is spent on a constant and debilitating pursuit
    of funding. This is detrimental to the service
    being delivered.
  • Multi-annual funding benefits the funding
    Department or agency as well, in that it allows
    for a more rational approach to planning service
    delivery and to processing of funding
    applications.
  • Ireland White Paper on Framework for Supporting
    Voluntary Activity

13
Duration of Agreement
  • Generally longer if
  • Continuity of personal, supportive, or
    therapeutic relations between caregiver and
    client is integral part of service (crime
    victims, juvenile delinquents, battered women)
  • Required to meet goals (proportionality)
  • Competitive Issues
  • Will prospective bidders be less likely to
    compete because of high proposal writing costs,
    start-up costs, or capital investments if a
    short-term agreement?

14
Multi-Annual Grants
  • Canada chronic or systemic social issues are
    not likely to be solved through short-term
    project funding
  • English Funding and Procurement Compact Code
  • Roll-forward multi-year agreements (often 3
    years) for grants
  • 2006 Improving financial relationships with the
    third sector Guidance to funders and
    purchasers
  • Length of funding should be tied to length of the
    objective
  • Croatian National Foundation
  • Institutional Support Grants 3 years
  • Democratization and Civil Society Development
    Grants
  • US approach

15
Monitoring and Evaluation
  • EU Sound Financial Management
  • Principles of economy, efficiency, and
    effectiveness, and compliance with those
    principles checked by means of performance
    indicators established per activity and
    measurable in such a way that results can be
    assessed.
  • Regulation 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation
    Applicable to the General Budget of the European
    Communities

16
Monitoring and Evaluation
  • Distinguish between evaluation of awarded project
    and of tender itself
  • Financial and Programmatic Reports
  • England
  • Focus on outcomes, proportionate to size of
    funding, the size of the provider, and the
    perceived risk.
  • Challenge Coordinating among Government
    Agencies
  • Evaluation
  • Quality of Performance
  • Timeliness of Performance
  • Fiscal Administration and Accountability
  • Role of NGO Sector in Entire Cycle, Including the
    Evaluation Process

17
Cost-Recovery
  • Administrative Expenses Attached to Program Costs
  • Rent, board meetings, project development, etc.
  • Canada it is recognized that overhead costs
    are necessary part of an organizations
    operations and that the organization has a
    right to be compensated.
  • US NICRA
  • Creating a Level Playing Field with Businesses
  • No profit is allowed
  • Incremental/Marginal Costs

18
Sectoral Support
  • Distinguish between activities, organizations and
    sector
  • 1993-2003 Hungarian Parliament challenges
  • Hungary National Civil Fund
  • Operational expenses of civil organizations
  • 60 of the resources are used to cover
    operational costs.
  • First year, 28 million euros distributed to cover
    operational costs of 3500 organizations.
  • Research, educational activities, statistics.
  • ?Need for Strategy based on Participatory Needs
    Assessment (CSI)

19
Sectoral Support
  • Canada Strategic Investment Approach
  • Croatia National Foundation for Civil Society
    Development
  • Democratization and Civil Society Development
  • Institutional Support
  • 692,000 out of 1.56 million
  • ?Need for Strategy based on Participatory Needs
    Assessment (CSI)
  • Tax/Fiscal Support

20
Thank you!
  • Doug Rutzen
  • International Center for Not-for-Profit Law
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com