A simultaneous school choice and commuting mode choice model - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

A simultaneous school choice and commuting mode choice model

Description:

choice probabilities ... schools of profile group 2 (math, music) will show a higher percentage of ... 'music' density 'magnet school' density 'language' density ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: Sve3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A simultaneous school choice and commuting mode choice model


1
A simultaneous school choice and commuting mode
choice model
Faculty of Transportation and Traffic Sciences
Friedrich List Institute of Logistics and
Aviation
Chair of Business Administration, Transport and
Logistics
Sven Müller, Stephan Brunow
  • RGS/IBG Annual International Conference 2007
  • London, UK August, 28.-31. 2007

2
Introduction
  • declining/increasing enrolment yields school
    closures/openings
  • modelling of school choice and travel-to-school
    mode choice
  • influencing factors/variables
  • choice probabilities
  • BUT simultaneous instead of sequential to
    discover the coherence between mode and school
    choice

3
Approach
why nested logit (NL)?
  • NL allows differential cross-elasticity among
    alternatives
  • represents joint decision making (school and
    mode choice)
  • allocates each alternative to a set of nests
  • recent research
  • Hensher and Reyes (2000) estimate nested logit
    for models of activity participation, trip
    chaining, and mode choice
  • Wen and Koppelman (2001) found the NL was
    superior to other formulations for intraurban
    mode-choice problems

4
Methodology
nesting structure (tree)
Koppelmann and Sethi (2002) e.g.
nest level 3 (K)
structural parameter
nest level 2 (J)
nest level 1 (I)
111
112
212
312
122
113
213
123
223
elemental alternatives
5
Methodology
NL product of a series of multinomial logit
(MNL) choice models see McFadden (1978)
6
Data
7
Data
closest school of each profile-group enters the
choice set for every student
8
Data
.50
.50
walking density
cycling density
.25
.25
travel-time min
travel-time min
.25
.50
car density
public trans. density
.25
travel-time min
travel-time min
9
Application
level car availability
level mode choice
level school choice
10
Results
11
Summary
  • simultaneous approach (nesting structure / NL)
    is adequate
  • fair weather increases choice probability for
    cycling
  • girls prefer safer modes like car/bus
  • schools of profile group 2 (math, music) will
    show a higher percentage of students
    walking/cycling
  • modes car/bus are most likely for public magnet
    schools offering 'languages'
  • future work control for misspecification
    estimate a multinomial simultaneous structural
    equation system (SSES) with latent utility

12
Faculty of Transportation and Traffic Sciences
Friedrich List Institute for Transport and
Economics
Chair of Business Administration, Transport and
Logistics
Sven Mueller, M.A.Dresden University of
TechnologyInstitute of Logistics and
AviationChair of Business Administration,
Transport and Logisticssven.mueller_at_tu-dresden.d
e http//www.vbl-dresden.de
13
Data
"music" density
"magnet school" density
travel-time min
travel-time min
"language" density
"math" density
travel-time min
travel-time min
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com