Effect of Bioprotectants on Turkey Sausages - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Effect of Bioprotectants on Turkey Sausages

Description:

... maxima causing a puncture in samples were determined using TA Di. 50 kg load cell and 4.76 mm probe was used to measure the force required to puncture the sample. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Niku
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Effect of Bioprotectants on Turkey Sausages


1
Effect of Bioprotectants on Turkey Sausages
  • N. Dhamankar, A.D Clarke
  • University of Missouri-Columbia

2
Introduction
  • Meat spoilage is an important concern of the
    industry.
  • Meat is a good source of nutrients for growth of
    microorganisms.
  • There is no perfect solution to prevent
    microbial contamination.

3
Meat quality
  • Meat quality factors
  • pH
  • Temperature
  • Water activity
  • WHC
  • Microbial population
  • Texture
  • Color

4
Improving quality
  • Meat quality improved by
  • Proper sanitation/ hygienic environment
  • Low temperature storage
  • MAP/vacuum packaging
  • Use of antimicrobials/ organic acids
  • Use of bacteriocins/ bioprotectants

5
Microgard
  • Product derived from Propionibacterium
    freudenreichii subsp. shermanii.
  • FDA approved
  • Generally Recognized As Safe
  • Contains organic acid (propionic acid), diacetyl
    and low molecular weight polypeptide.

6
Objective
  • To determine the effectiveness of MicrogardTM 510
    and MicrogardTM 300 on the quality of turkey
    sausages during refrigerated storage.

7
Materials
  • Ground Turkey (15 crude fat)
  • Microgard 510
  • - 0.2, 0.3, 0.45
  • Microgard 300
  • - 0.4, 0.7, 0.9

8
Method
  • Turkey sausage
  • - 1 lb of ground turkey ice, nitrite, spices,
    antimicrobial.
  • Mixed together for 1 min then stuffed in tubes
  • Cooked in water bath for 30 min to 180F
  • Stored at 4C up to 14 days

9
pH and aw measurement
  • pH
  • 5 g of cooked sausage was homogenized with 45mL
    of distilled water.
  • Aw
  • Measured using Aqualab machine

10
Water Holding Capacity
  • Water holding capacity
  • 0.48-0.51g of sample was placed on filter paper
    and pressed between Plexiglass plates and
    pressure of 500 psi applied for 1 minute.
  • The WHC was expressed as
  • Area of outer ring
  • Area of inner meat ring

11
Color
  • Color
  • L, a, b values of sausage were obtained using a
    Minolta colorimeter.

12
Texture
  • Texture
  • Texture profile analysis (TPA) of sausage was
    completed in triplicate
  • Samples were compressed to 50 of the original
    height (10mm) using TA.XT2 Texture Analyser.

13
Puncture test
  • Puncture test
  • The force maxima causing a puncture in samples
    were determined using TADi.
  • 50 kg load cell and 4.76 mm probe was used to
    measure the force required to puncture the
    sample.

14
Microbiological testing
  • Raw material and sausage samples analyzed using
    standard pour plate methods and the following
    media
  • Plate count agar (PCA)
  • de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe agar (MRS)
  • Yeast and mold agar (YM)

15
Statistical analysis
  • The experiment was replicated 3 times.
  • The data was subjected to ANOVA with randomized
    block design using SAS.

16
Chemical Results
a,b Means in rows with no common subscript differ
(plt0.05)
17
Color Results
a,b Means in rows with no common subscript differ
(plt0.05)
18
a value
19
Log reduction for PCA
n
n
20
Log reduction for YM
21
Log reduction for MRS
22
TPA results
a,b Means in rows with no common subscript differ
(plt0.05)
23
Puncture test
a,b Means in rows with no common subscript differ
(plt0.05)
24
Conclusion
  • Quality changes were observed when high levels of
    MicrogardTM were used.
  • High concentrations of MicrogardTM would be
    effective in reducing microbial growth for 2
    weeks for vacuum packaged turkey sausage.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com