Review of Summary Trial Proceedings - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Review of Summary Trial Proceedings

Description:

If unduly severe, the review authority must substitute a new punishment ... Mitigate means to award a lesser amount of the same punishment ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:344
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: markwm
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Review of Summary Trial Proceedings


1
Chapter 15
  • Review of Summary Trial Proceedings

2
Objectives
  • Describe the process of reviewing the findings
    and punishments imposed at summary trials

3
Main Points
  • Review under QRO 108.45
  • Review under QRO 116.02
  • Power of Review Authorities
  • Post Review Administration
  • Judicial Review

4
General
  • To review any guilty finding or sentence of a
    summary trial is important for maintaining the
    fairness of the summary trial process
  • Developed in response to the recommendations made
    by the Special Advisory Group

5
General
  • Protect the offenders right to be dealt with
    fairly while satisfying the requirement to deal
    with minor service offences at the unit level
    promptly
  • Offender also has the right to apply for judicial
    review of a summary trial from the Federal Court
    of Canada or any provincial Superior Court

6
Entitlement and Grounds to Request Review
  • Set aside a finding of guilty on the grounds it
    is unjustAlter any punishment on the grounds it
    is unjust or too severe

7
Review Authority
  • A delegated officer is the CO of the unit
  • Commanding Officer is the next superior officer
    to whom the CO of a unit is responsible in
    matters of discipline
  • Superior commander is the next superior officer
    to whom the superior commander is responsible in
    matters of discipline

8
Referral by Review Authority
  • When a referral authority believes it
    inappropriate to act as the review authority,
    that officer must
  • not make any determination in respect of the
    request for review
  • refer the request for review to the next superior
    officer to whom the officer is responsible in
    matters of discipline

9
Redress of Grievance
  • Grievance process can no longer be used in
    respect of any matter that may be dealt with by
    summary trial review
  • Offender must request review

10
Contents of a Request for Review
  • Made in writing, either a memorandum or letter
  • Set out relevant facts

11
Contents of a Request for Review
Contain as much relevant information as possible
Not obliged to provide a copy of the RDP,
attachments, investigative report which the
review authority can obtain from the Unit
Registry of Disciplinary Proceedings
Info on punishments that have been imposed within
the unit for similar offences would be appropriate
12
Assistance to Offender Requesting Review
  • When an offender requests, CO must appoint an
    officer or NCM above the rank of Sgt to assist
  • Request for particular member to assist, that
    person should be appointed if available

13
Procedural Requirements - Timings
  • Within 14 days of the end of the summary trial, a
    request for review must be delivered to the
    review authority and a copy to the officer who
    presided at trial
  • Review authority may extend the period

14
Procedural Requirements - Timings
  • The officer who presided at the summary trial has
    7 days to deliver the presiding officers
    comments to the review authority, with a copy to
    the offender
  • Within 7 days of receiving presiding officers
    comments, the offender may deliver further
    representations to the review authority

15
Suspension of Punishment of Detention
  • Review authority shall suspend the carrying into
    effect of the detention

16
Legal Advice
  • Review authority shall obtain legal advice

17
Review Process
  • Within 21 days, review authority shall make a
    determination and cause the offender, the
    presiding officer and the offenders CO to be
    notified in writing of the decision

18
Review Process
  • If additional information is required, the review
    authority shall
  • seek the necessary information
  • notify the offender that further information is
    being sought
  • provide the offender with copies of further
    information obtained

19
Review Process
  • Within 7 days offender may deliver further
    representations to the review
  • When further information is sought, review
    authority has 35 days from the date of the
    request for review was received to make a
    determination

20
Review Process
  • A finding of guilty would be unjust if it is
    contrary to law or fundamentally unfair
  • To merit quashing, the breach of the regulations
    must render the verdict unjust
  • If the breach of the regulations is
    inconsequential, the finding will not be
    considered unjust on that basis alone

21
Review Process
  • A punishment may be considered unjust if the
    punishment imposed is illegal
  • Sentence may be considered too severe if it is
    far more severe than what is usually given for
    the same offence under similar circumstances
  • Before disturbing a sentence, satisfied that it
    was clearly unreasonable in the circumstances

22
Review Process
  • A review authority has the power to
  • quash a finding
  • alter findings made
  • alter punishments imposed
  • suspend detention

23
Review Under QRO 116.02
  • Review authorities are
  • the CDS
  • an officer commanding a command
  • an officer commanding a formation

24
Review Under QRO 116.02
  • Review authorities are
  • a CO when the offender is under the COs command
    and the presiding officer was not a superior
    commander
  • an officer acting as a review authority under
    QRO 108.45

25
Review Under QRO 116.02
Note 1 No set procedure to initiate a review
and it is not necessary for the offender to
request review. Review can be initiated by the
review authority (except if the accused was found
not guilty).
Note 2 No time limits for review under this
QRO as the underlying rational for this form of
review is to allow military authorities to
correct an error identified in a summary trial
when reviewed by a unit legal advisor.
Note 3 Unit legal advisors review all unit RDPs
on a monthly basis for mistakes that are apparent
on the document. If a problem is found, the
matter can be addressed through this review
process.
26
Power of Review Authorities
  • Review authority may decide to
  • quash a finding
  • substitute a new finding
  • substitute a punishment
  • mitigate, commute or remit a punishment

27
Quashing Findings
  • May quash any finding of guilty made at summary
    trial. The effect is that no finding of guilty
    remains and the whole sentence imposed ceases to
    have force and effect
  • When a finding of guilty has been quashed, the
    accused can be tried again for the offence as if
    no previous trial had taken place

28
Substitution of Findings
  • If a finding of guilty is illegal or cannot be
    supported by the evidence, a new finding may be
    substituted
  • Review authority can only substitute findings
    that could validly have been made at the original
    trial including a finding of guilty on a
    different offence if the facts appear to prove
    guilt beyond a reasonable doubt on the other
    offence

29
Substitution of Findings
  • Must ensure that the punishment imposed at
    summary trial is appropriate to the new findings
  • If unduly severe, the review authority must
    substitute a new punishment

30
Mitigation, Commutation and Remission of
Punishments
  • Mitigate means to award a lesser amount of the
    same punishment
  • Commute means to replace the punishment with
    another punishment lower on the scale of
    punishments
  • Remit means to dispense with the requirement to
    undergo the whole or any part of a sentence that
    remains

31
Post Review Administration
  • The review authority must
  • cause the offender, the presiding officer and the
    offenders CO to be notified in writing of the
    decision
  • cause a copy of the decision to be placed on the
    Unit Registry on which the original RDP was
    placed
  • cause the appropriate entries to be made to Part
    7 of the original RDP

32
Judicial Review
  • Anyone found guilty at summary trial may apply
    for judicial review by application to the Federal
    Court of Canada or to the superior court in the
    province where the summary trial took place

33
Judicial Review
  • Is not an appeal, it is a review by the courts to
    determine if the service tribunal exceeded its
    jurisdiction
  • Procedures and application requirements are set
    out in the rules or statutes that apply to the
    court being asked to conduct the review

34
Chapter 15
  • Review of Summary Trial Proceedings
  • The End

35
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com