Title: Review of Summary Trial Proceedings
1Chapter 15
- Review of Summary Trial Proceedings
2Objectives
- Describe the process of reviewing the findings
and punishments imposed at summary trials
3Main Points
- Review under QRO 108.45
- Review under QRO 116.02
- Power of Review Authorities
- Post Review Administration
- Judicial Review
4General
- To review any guilty finding or sentence of a
summary trial is important for maintaining the
fairness of the summary trial process - Developed in response to the recommendations made
by the Special Advisory Group
5General
- Protect the offenders right to be dealt with
fairly while satisfying the requirement to deal
with minor service offences at the unit level
promptly - Offender also has the right to apply for judicial
review of a summary trial from the Federal Court
of Canada or any provincial Superior Court
6Entitlement and Grounds to Request Review
- Set aside a finding of guilty on the grounds it
is unjustAlter any punishment on the grounds it
is unjust or too severe
7Review Authority
- A delegated officer is the CO of the unit
- Commanding Officer is the next superior officer
to whom the CO of a unit is responsible in
matters of discipline - Superior commander is the next superior officer
to whom the superior commander is responsible in
matters of discipline
8Referral by Review Authority
- When a referral authority believes it
inappropriate to act as the review authority,
that officer must - not make any determination in respect of the
request for review - refer the request for review to the next superior
officer to whom the officer is responsible in
matters of discipline
9Redress of Grievance
- Grievance process can no longer be used in
respect of any matter that may be dealt with by
summary trial review - Offender must request review
10Contents of a Request for Review
- Made in writing, either a memorandum or letter
- Set out relevant facts
11Contents of a Request for Review
Contain as much relevant information as possible
Not obliged to provide a copy of the RDP,
attachments, investigative report which the
review authority can obtain from the Unit
Registry of Disciplinary Proceedings
Info on punishments that have been imposed within
the unit for similar offences would be appropriate
12Assistance to Offender Requesting Review
- When an offender requests, CO must appoint an
officer or NCM above the rank of Sgt to assist - Request for particular member to assist, that
person should be appointed if available
13Procedural Requirements - Timings
- Within 14 days of the end of the summary trial, a
request for review must be delivered to the
review authority and a copy to the officer who
presided at trial - Review authority may extend the period
14Procedural Requirements - Timings
- The officer who presided at the summary trial has
7 days to deliver the presiding officers
comments to the review authority, with a copy to
the offender - Within 7 days of receiving presiding officers
comments, the offender may deliver further
representations to the review authority
15Suspension of Punishment of Detention
- Review authority shall suspend the carrying into
effect of the detention
16Legal Advice
- Review authority shall obtain legal advice
17Review Process
- Within 21 days, review authority shall make a
determination and cause the offender, the
presiding officer and the offenders CO to be
notified in writing of the decision
18Review Process
- If additional information is required, the review
authority shall - seek the necessary information
- notify the offender that further information is
being sought - provide the offender with copies of further
information obtained
19Review Process
- Within 7 days offender may deliver further
representations to the review - When further information is sought, review
authority has 35 days from the date of the
request for review was received to make a
determination
20Review Process
- A finding of guilty would be unjust if it is
contrary to law or fundamentally unfair - To merit quashing, the breach of the regulations
must render the verdict unjust - If the breach of the regulations is
inconsequential, the finding will not be
considered unjust on that basis alone
21Review Process
- A punishment may be considered unjust if the
punishment imposed is illegal - Sentence may be considered too severe if it is
far more severe than what is usually given for
the same offence under similar circumstances - Before disturbing a sentence, satisfied that it
was clearly unreasonable in the circumstances
22Review Process
- A review authority has the power to
- quash a finding
- alter findings made
- alter punishments imposed
- suspend detention
23Review Under QRO 116.02
- Review authorities are
- the CDS
- an officer commanding a command
- an officer commanding a formation
24Review Under QRO 116.02
- Review authorities are
- a CO when the offender is under the COs command
and the presiding officer was not a superior
commander - an officer acting as a review authority under
QRO 108.45
25Review Under QRO 116.02
Note 1 No set procedure to initiate a review
and it is not necessary for the offender to
request review. Review can be initiated by the
review authority (except if the accused was found
not guilty).
Note 2 No time limits for review under this
QRO as the underlying rational for this form of
review is to allow military authorities to
correct an error identified in a summary trial
when reviewed by a unit legal advisor.
Note 3 Unit legal advisors review all unit RDPs
on a monthly basis for mistakes that are apparent
on the document. If a problem is found, the
matter can be addressed through this review
process.
26Power of Review Authorities
- Review authority may decide to
- quash a finding
- substitute a new finding
- substitute a punishment
- mitigate, commute or remit a punishment
27Quashing Findings
- May quash any finding of guilty made at summary
trial. The effect is that no finding of guilty
remains and the whole sentence imposed ceases to
have force and effect - When a finding of guilty has been quashed, the
accused can be tried again for the offence as if
no previous trial had taken place
28Substitution of Findings
- If a finding of guilty is illegal or cannot be
supported by the evidence, a new finding may be
substituted - Review authority can only substitute findings
that could validly have been made at the original
trial including a finding of guilty on a
different offence if the facts appear to prove
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt on the other
offence
29Substitution of Findings
- Must ensure that the punishment imposed at
summary trial is appropriate to the new findings - If unduly severe, the review authority must
substitute a new punishment
30Mitigation, Commutation and Remission of
Punishments
- Mitigate means to award a lesser amount of the
same punishment - Commute means to replace the punishment with
another punishment lower on the scale of
punishments - Remit means to dispense with the requirement to
undergo the whole or any part of a sentence that
remains
31Post Review Administration
- The review authority must
- cause the offender, the presiding officer and the
offenders CO to be notified in writing of the
decision - cause a copy of the decision to be placed on the
Unit Registry on which the original RDP was
placed - cause the appropriate entries to be made to Part
7 of the original RDP
32Judicial Review
- Anyone found guilty at summary trial may apply
for judicial review by application to the Federal
Court of Canada or to the superior court in the
province where the summary trial took place
33Judicial Review
- Is not an appeal, it is a review by the courts to
determine if the service tribunal exceeded its
jurisdiction - Procedures and application requirements are set
out in the rules or statutes that apply to the
court being asked to conduct the review
34Chapter 15
- Review of Summary Trial Proceedings
- The End
35(No Transcript)