Title: It
1Its rainingtrainingbut will the crops
grow?
- by Guy Berger,
- presentation to
- NCRF Training Providers Consultative meeting
- 3 August 2001
2 Ideal logic
- Community radio ?
- Community of radio stations (NCRF) ?
- Community of radio training providers?
3Get close up
- Ideal vs reality
- a real community is constructed
- a real community contains both conflict
concord - recognise real interests
4 Trainers interests
- True or false?
- Radio trainers are pure altruists
- Community radio is their passion - but also their
livelihood. - They compete with each other.
5Who earns who learns?
- True or false
- Trainers learn as much if not more
from training, as do trainees. - We work like bees, and we already get
paid for it - So why bother with something like a trainers
forum?
6NCRF interests
- King of the network
- Must deliver to members
- Power to eat any out-of-favour providers
7Trainees
- True or false?
- Many are professional trainees in search of
junkets
8Pray theyll stay
- Hand-up hand-out?
- Drain vs new blood?
- Do we really make enough impact from our
training?
9- So, creating a community of trainers has to be a
hard-nosed business! - And a very complex one ...
10 We need to tackle pedagogy debates
- Methodologies
- Train on-site or not?
- Centre vs periphery
- Language
- Skill, talks texts
- Stations as trainers
11More debate
- Skills transfer, or is it development?
- Go for breadth, with many trained, or
- Go for depth train fewer, but better
12Debate multiplier effect
- Do trainees bomb out back at the station? Or is
it each one, teach one?
13For a community to fly ...
- Need to agree on core principles about what
makes for effective training. - A shared perspective sharing knowledge.
Some possible principles ...
14PRINCIPLE 1 Trainer-trainee-station
Learner-centred
15PRINCIPLE 1 Trainer-trainee-organisation
Learner-centred But context- driven
As the strength of a chain is determined by its
weakest link, so the least contribution of any
one partner becomes the maximum level of
effectiveness possible
16PRINCIPLE 2 Ladder of learning
- One-off and fragmented training experiences
resource waste - Investment in progressive learning over time
17PRINCIPLE 3 Training target A Head
- Train the brain
- information
- knowledge
- intellectual skills
18Training target B Hands
- Practice
- Skills to implement
19Target C Heart of the matter
- If you forget about attitude, your training wont
fly. - You can train for media freedom ethics, for
anti-sexism, anti-racism, etc.
20Target D The Wallet
- The point is
- Whats the pay-off?
- Financial
- Organisational
- Programme-related
- Is there a difference to the fulfillment of the
community radio mission?
21Holistic training
- So, training should be planned and assessed in
terms of - K nowledge
- A ttitude
- P ractice
- P ay-off
22PRINCIPLE 4 PROCESS
No application at the station ? Trainee didnt
learn much ? Cos poor delivery (or good, but )
? Poor course design ? Because wasnt based on
needs, or
- Training is a journey
- - you can trace problems backwards
23Process stages
If it did meet need? May be wrong trainees? Or
workplace blocks ? Or training not
the solution
24Process lessons
- Front-end work
- is critical
- you cant salvage a wrong course or wrong
trainees.
Secrets of success can also be traced through
preceding stages
25PRINCIPLE 6 EVALUATE
- Reaction do they like it?
- Learning are they learning it?
- Application are they using it?
- Pay-off does it make a difference?
26Remember ...
- Good reaction
- ? learning
- Learning
- ? application
- Application
- ? pay-off
- Its a package.
27Realms n phases
28Priorities recommended of courses to evaluate
29Evaluation
- Begin before the beginning of a course
- Continue long after the end.
- Cover reaction, learning, application, pay-off
at every stage. - Results youll find what works, what needs
work. -
Its this training that did it
30Agreed!
Sharing - in the interests
of training - means we can combine forces to
build a stronger sector
31- Diversity amongst trainers does not preclude
co-operation, collaboration, or even
convergence in some cases.
32Competition
will - and should - continue, but alongside
complaboration collabetition
33Earn your stripes
- Common standards will improve performance.
- Centres of excellence will emerge.
eg. More expertise in kids programmes (W Cape)
drama (KZN) education (Gauteng) etc.
34- Providers will develop special and unique
features. - Alongside a lot of shared overlap in basic
training (which needs to be spread around the
regions).
- Rationalisation of training Some will be
organic, some will be planned
35- Warning
- without greater co-operation and communication,
trainers will end up competing over the dead-body
of community radio. - Combine to help it conquer!
36The gain in train
- Serving the sector ? a servant of the sector.
- Providers should offer
- Needs-driven AND needs-arousing training.
- Demand- AND supply- driven courses.
- A proactive community.
37- Shapiro-Nel study of 14 stations training needs
recorded that not more than one singled out - journalism training,
- covering poverty
- reporting local govt.
Only 3 said gender training. None said training
in media convergence. Providers cant ignore
these areas!
38Working together - way to go
- Accept diverse interests and major complexities.
- Recognise theres a role for all, a need for
all, space for all. - Acknowledge complaboration.
- Be active agents.
39Fly in the ointment?
- How?
- What does NCRF co-ordination mean?
- Can centralisation include fair tenders and
leveraging? - Is control a bad thing?
40Final thought
- Training principle The sign of a good trainer
is not the impression developed among trainees
about how well they were taught, but rather, how
much they feel they have learned.
Likewise, trainer egos should be 2ndary within a
network of providers.
41- Lots of work needed ...
- Cicadas make a racket, but when you look, you
cant find them!
42Training is a good thingnow lets make it even
better
43 The End(or the Beginning?)
http//journ.ru.ac.za/staff/guy/