Title: Reinterpretation of the Seattle uplift, Washington, as a passive roof duplex
1Reinterpretation of the Seattle uplift,
Washington, as a passive roof duplex
- Tom Brocher, Rick Blakely, and Ray Wells
- U.S. Geological Survey
- Menlo Park, California
2Whats a passive roof duplex?
One sided fold (monocline)
A modified fault-bend fold, sometimes called a
triangle wedge or a triangle zone
Wedge tip
3The Old Model
Seattle
Tacoma
Folds
Seattle fault
Slip at depth
A fault-propagation fold
4Hazards Posed by Old Model
Seismic energy directed toward Seattle Seismic
waves amplified by Seattle basin Shallow
faulting M 7.6-7.7 estimated
Seattle
Slip at depth
Seattle fault
Slip at depth
5Problems with Old Model
- North-dipping thrust faults not explained
- 2) Tacoma fault zone not incorporated
- 3) Shallow folding not convincingly explained
- 4) Seattle monocline not recognized as evidence
for a wedge - 5) Coseismic uplift data not well predicted
6The New Model
M6.4
M7.2
M6.7?
Shallow slip, multiple sources
7Depth in miles to the main faults
Seattle
Seattle fault
Tacoma fault
8Seattle fault zone
You are here
Seattle fault zone
9Seattle fault zone
Blake Island
10Seattle fault zone - AD 900
Blake Island
M6.4
M7.2
11Folding along Seattle fault - Lake Washington
Johnson et al. (1999)
12Passive roof thrusts
Passive roof thrusts only slip when the master
floor thrusts slip - they do not represent
independent seismic sources. Paleo slip on them
tells us about slip on the master floor thrusts.
13Other wedges (Pakistan)
Banks and Warburton (1986)
14Summary of New Model
- Seattle and Tacoma faults are blind thrusts
- Both faults overlain by shallow roof thrusts
- Leading edge (wedge tip) of Seattle fault moved
northward to northern end of Elliott Bay - Directivity, basin amplification remain important
- Tilting and folding are integral and important in
a narrow band south of the wedge tip - Shallow north-dipping thrust faulting is passive
- Deformation in Seattle basin
15The End
BSSA in review, brocher_at_usgs.gov