Title: AN OPEN SOURCE TELE-REPORTING SYSTEM BASED ON RAILS
1Aziende Sanitarie Virtualiper i Popoli Migranti
Aldo Franco Dragoni
Lorenzo FalsettiNicola Tarquinio
2TCP/IP-BASED TELECARDIOLOGYRESULTS PITFALLS -
PERSPECTIVES
U.O. DI MEDICINA INTERNAOSPEDALE DI
OSIMO Director Dott. Prof. Francesco
Pellegrini UNIVERSITA POLITECNICA DELLE
MARCHE FACOLTA DI INGEGNERIA Prof. Aldo Franco
Dragoni Pellegrini F, Falsetti L, Del Prete S,
Filippi G, Tarquinio N, Rossini S, Di Stefano S,
Ciotti G, Vaccarini I, Clavelli A and Aldo
Franco Dragoni
3A 5-years experience
- A TCP/IP-based telemedicine system has been
implemented all over our territory - Since then, it has been used to carry several
kind of informations 1. Cardiological
Consultation2. ECGs (first opinion/second
opinion)3. Echocardiograms (second opinion)
4Standard Protocols
Standard Protocols
- In order to reduce errors, we Standardized
- EquipmentThe whole operations were based upon
the same system - OperatorsA formation period of 2 months was
required for the initial training of a standard
equipe of 2 nurses. - ProceduresAll the procedures, from acquisition
to report were made upon the same protocol
5Man power
Man Power
- This system allowed to manage the work in our
Hospital with a minimal equipe 1. Physicians
3 trained physicians Report,
Quality control
Case management
Second-level examinations -
(when needed) 2. Nurses - 2 trained nurses/point Data collection
-
Data transfer - Small damages repair
Every acquisition point was entirely managed by
2 Nurses. Resident physicians were excluded
from protocols but could have access to the
system and could ask for a second opinion on
their exhamination
6(No Transcript)
7Standardization
- We applied the same protocols for- Inpatients
- Admitted in our Unit - Admitted in the
other Units- Outpatients - Territorial
cardiology - Other Units Outpatients (Day
Hospital) - Drug survelliance for psychiatric
patients- Other Nations Services
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10Nonstandard Procedures
- Non-standard procedures were allowed only
- in a service based upon our servers but using
- another technology for a mission in the
- Philippines.
- The whole operation has been managed by
- University of Siena.
11Endpoints
Endpoints
- Reduce reporting times
- Increase number of reports
- Standardize reporting
- Increase productivity
- Create a large repository of anamnestic data
- Create a common database for instrumental
findings
12Outside Italy
Emerging Countries
- Despite the massive workload in our Zone we were
asked to try to export our experience in foreign
Countries - We were asked to install the same system in
Kerkennah Island, near Sfax (Tunisia) - The place have been selected by locals who asked
for a cardiology reporting system
13Outside Italy
Outside Italy
- Another mission, managed by University of Siena
but hosted in our systems, was installed in the
Philippines
14Outside Italy
Outside Italy
- Kerkennah system is a mirror of our actual
territorial installations - 2 tunisian nurses
teached in our hospital- A client and a
digitizer for cardiological informations - In our vision, this installation should have been
a pilot project in order to extend our model of
telecardiology outside Italy
15Pitfalls
Pitfalls
- In Italy we are working with large volumes of
data (about 11000 ECGs reported, with a mean of
500 ECG/digitizer/year). - Tunisian equipe didnt send more than 150
tracings over a two-year period an useless
volume, counting the high cost sustained by our
Hospital (Formation, Gear, Installation)
16Pitfalls
Pitfalls
- Technology issuesa. Network incompatibility
fixedb. Software bugs
fixed - c. Client Hardware errors
fixed - Manpower issuesa. On-site training and
re-training doneb. On-site quality
control missions done
17Pitfalls
Pitfalls
- Still, this project, despite the hard work, is
not growing as expected - The main reason is that local physicians have
(mis)interpreted the presence centralized system
as an exclusion from the diagnostic process - Thus, despite continous interventions, this
project is not growing as expected
18(No Transcript)
19The Future
Perspectives
- Despite pitfalls, we are enlarging the networkby
creating more acquisition points - In 2008 we will install two more stations, one in
our territory and one in a foreign country - This project will evolve, in the next future,
with another project called Miro which
should solve many issues
20The Future
Perspectives
- The actual system is, as already stated, a
centralized system - Its main limit is that it depends on one or few
centers - On the other side, a centralized telemedicine is
easier to administer. Quality is easier to be
controlled.
21Actual Situation
22doctors
requesters
23both the doctors and the requesters have to be
authenticated
24DIGITAL SIGNATURE Smart Card
25ASINCHRONOUS BROKER-BASED ARCHITECTURE
VIRTUAL COMMUNITY
SOCIAL NETWORK
- no complex dedicated hardware (PC-based clients)?
- data-transfer throught Internet (ADSL or Dial-Up
modems)? - costs independent on the number of installations.
- independent on the particular field of medicine.
26Differences
Osimo Telecardiology(Actual Situation) Miro(Future Convergence)
Centralized Diffuse
One Lab, One Standard Many Physicians
Same quality for pts Heterogeneus
Mainly Cardiological Virtually covers all
Excludes local physician Includes local physician
Propietary Code Open Source
Links DICOM Peripheral Links DICOM Peripheral
Propietary Format Most Common Formats
EBM-based Lab EBM-based System
Costly Free
Requires High-End Systems Runs also on Low-Ends
27Problems Of Other Systems
- Not easy-to-use
- Specific applications and architectures
- Dedicated hardware
- Dedicated connections
- Costs proportional to number of connected hosts
- Lack of sustainable and stable services
28Three Steps
Convergence
Step One Complete Coding Enhance Compatibility
- Step One
- Create Competent Professionals
- Create Trusted Centers
Step Two Enlarge the Network Continuous Teaching
Step Two Create Migration Tools Beta Testing
Step Three Migrate DataInvolve local
InstitutionsInvolve international institutions
29HOSTING in the west world health records of
migrating people
we only needInternet connections
30is for stable and reliable organizations
31is for stable and reliable organizations
32is for stable and reliable organizations
33Conclusions
- being data stored in a central server, a virtual
health-care agency takes place that maintain
clinical folders of patients wherever theyll go
all around the world - telereporting is an advantage especially for
regions where there are few sanitary resources - flexible software architecture for telereporting
activities based on TCP/IP. - data-transfer through Internet using digital
certificates and timestamp. - creating communities for searching/offering
medical opinions
34 35workflow
1. an operator, through MIROs interface,
inserts the patient's data and the information
about the the diagnostic tuipe of the datum (for
instance the ECG) the software will store all
the data on the database of the central server.
2. any specialist is able, through the
appropriate dotation HW/SW, to remotely consult
their appropriate requests he can choose the
case he wants to report and eventually accesses
the patient's clinical folder
3. eventually the specialist might be able to
draw up the report in electronic format.
4. the report is made directly through the
application interface.
5. eventually the operator close the event
36Why Open Source?
- bringing good quality medical services to rural
and remote areas mainly in developing regions
with scarce resources - software development requires little or no
initial investment - potential for evolution are generally easier with
open source software - interoperability and standards compliance
37clinical folder
38SCHEMA E-R
39timestamping
40REQUESTERs opening mask
41DOCTORs operating mask
42DOCTORs examination viewer
43DOCTORs operating mask
44DOCTORs report mask
45DOCTORs operating mask
46REQUESTERs viewing mask