DEVELOPMENTAL EVALUATION OF A HOMEBASED CARDIAC REHABILTATION EXERCISE PROGRAMME - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

DEVELOPMENTAL EVALUATION OF A HOMEBASED CARDIAC REHABILTATION EXERCISE PROGRAMME

Description:

DEVELOPMENTAL EVALUATION OF A HOME-BASED CARDIAC REHABILTATION EXERCISE PROGRAMME ... were identified and then streamed into three categories: completers, non ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: RAH
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DEVELOPMENTAL EVALUATION OF A HOMEBASED CARDIAC REHABILTATION EXERCISE PROGRAMME


1
DEVELOPMENTAL EVALUATION OF A HOME-BASED CARDIAC
REHABILTATION EXERCISE PROGRAMME
Innes GMa, Catto SMa, Mansouri Db, Bowman
GMa,MacIntyre PDa. aRoyal Alexandra Hospital,
Paisley bUniversity of Glasgow Glasgow,
Scotland on behalf of the Have a Heart Paisley
Steering Group
INTRODUCTION
RESULTS
STUDY LIMITATIONS
  • The Home Based Exercise Programme (HB-ex) is one
    of four Phase III options currently available to
    patients entering Cardiac Rehabilitation at the
    RAH, Paisley
  • It was designed to provide a viable exercise
    alternative for those patients unable, or less
    inclined to participate in the Hospital Group
    Exercise Classes (HOSP-ex)
  • Since its inception in 2002, clinicians have felt
    that the uptake and completion of this service at
    the RAH has been lower than expected.
  • STRENGTHS
  • The completer group were significantly older than
    non-completers (66 vs. 59yrs, p0.03)
  • From the questionnaire, a significantly greater
    proportion of patients rated the exercise
    component of cardiac rehabilitation as extremely
    important (p0.002)
  • A significantly greater proportion of patients
    reported that they felt they were given enough
    information about exercise (p0.005). 100 of the
    patients surveyed said they did not have any
    concerns about exercising at home.
  • The flexibility of the programme allowed patients
    to participate in Cardiac Rehabilitation when
    they would not otherwise have been able to.
  • Patients were happy with the improvements they
    had made at home. Several mentioned that their
    capacity for exercise had improved and attributed
    this to the exercises that were prescribed.
  • Staff support by telephone was reported as being
    very supportive and influenced patients
    enthusiasm to continue with their programme.
  • The questionnaire results showed that a
    significantly greater proportion of patients
    thought the level of support was just right
    (plt0.001)
  • WEAKNESSES
  • The focus groups identified an inability to
    generate an adequate social support network at
    home.
  • Patients also mentioned the difficulty
    remembering the correct exercises technique at
    home.
  • BARRIERS TO ADHERENCE
  • Barriers to adherence were varied. These
    included
  • Patient motivation
  • Patient confidence in their ability following a
    Cardiac Event. How much they did and how long
    they did it for. This seemed to be most prominent
    in the first few weeks post discharge
  • Perception of illness was significant. It
    influenced how quickly they lost enthusiasm in
    exercise
  • Perceived lack of Health Professionals support.
    Patients who did not feel that they were given a
    lot of support seemed to stop exercising quicker
    than others. However the level of support was
    judged to be adequate by the majority of patients
    who completed the questionnaire (plt0.001).
  • SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS FROM FOCUS GROUPS
  • A small discussion group, post discharge, to
    alleviate initial fears of being at home. This
    would need to be accessible in patients
    locality. 65 of those who answered the
    questionnaire said the idea was good but 35 of
    those said they wouldnt use.
  • Patient recruitment was very difficult especially
    for patients who were referred to HB-ex but did
    not uptake. There were no non-attenders in the
    focus groups and only 3 answered the
    questionnaire.
  • It was therefore impossible to explore reasons
    for non uptake or non completion as the study
    sample was too small.

CONCLUSIONS
  • Satisfaction with the HB-ex programme was high.
  • The provision of this service to those who are
    unable to attend the hospital appears to be
    rewarding
  • Adherence levels seemed to vary considerably and
    patients mentioned a waning of enthusiasm over
    time. The degree of decline seemed to be linked
    to two specific variables patients attitudes
    towards their illness, and the support they
    received from the healthcare service.
  • Suggested Improvements for adherence to the
    service were
  • Locally held discussion group
  • An audiovisual aid to the programme
  • Home visits by the exercise physiologist
  • A six month exercise test post dischargeTwo of
    these suggestions are going to be looked at in
    the future.
  • the uptake for HB-ex was higher than the
    HOSP-ex Programme and completion rates were 63
    as apposed to 70 in the HOSP-ex programme
    therefore concluding that the programme was not
    vastly different for Hospitalbased services.
  • The programme needs to be administered by more
    than one individual and may be split according to
    patient risk

AIM
  • To examine the perceived strengths and weaknesses
    of the HB-ex programme,
  • Explore barriers to uptake and completion
  • Identify factors to facilitate improvement in
    these areas

METHODS
  • DESIGN
  • 3 Patient Focus Groups, 1 Staff Focus Group and
    Telephone Questionnaire
  • PARTICIPANTS
  • 107 patients that had been referred for HB-ex
    were identified from the Cardiac Rehab database
    and the Home Based Database
  • 83 (78) up-took the programme
  • 55 (51) completed the programme, 66 of
    up-takers
  • 28 (26) did not complete, 34 of up-takers
  • PROCEDURES
  • Patients were identified and then streamed into
    three categories completers, non completers and
    non-uptakers
  • Patients were invited to a focus group in one of
    these three categories
  • An additional staff focus group was held to
    explore staff perceptions
  • Attempts were made to telephone administer the
    questionnaire to all participants not enrolled in
    the focus group or had not previously indicated
    they did not wish to take part (n81). Of these,
    a total of 34 individuals were contactable by
    telephone and 28 of these agreed to take part.
  • ANALYSIS
  • Between group differences in demographics at
    baseline were identified by One-way ANOVA for
    numerical data, and chi-squared analysis for
    categorical variables
  • All focus group audio tapes were transcribed by
    the researchers and then analysed using a coding
    frame
  • Attention was devoted to the interactions between
    participants. Common themes were identified and
    any disparities between groups was noted.
  • Questionnaire results were analysed as one-sample
    data using chi-squared

REFERENCES
  • Oldridge NB Compliance in Cardiac Rehab.
    Physician Sport Med 1979794-103
  • Kodis J Smith KM et al. Changes in exercise
    capacity and lipids after clinic versus
    home-based aerobic training in coronary artery
    bypass surgery patients. Journal of
    Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation. Vol21(1)
    (pp31-36),2001.
  • Miller RN, Haskell WL, Berr RN, DeBusk RF. Home
    versus group exercise training for functional
    capacity after Myocardial infarction.
    Circulation. Vol.107(17)(pp2201-2206),2003. May
    06
  • Brubaker PH, Rejeski WJ, Smith MJ et al. A
    home-based exercise programme after center-based
    cardiac rehabilitation Effects on blood lipids,
    body composition and functional capacity. Journal
    of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation
    Vol.20(1)(pp50-56),2000
  • DeBusk RF. Home-Based and Worksite-Based Exercise
    Training for Patients with Coronary Artery
    Disease. Cardiology Clinics 199311(2)285-295

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
Please contact geraldine.innes_at_rah.scot.nhs.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com