Title: Quantum physics (quantum theory, quantum mechanics)
1Quantum physics(quantum theory, quantum
mechanics)
2Summary of 1st lecture
- classical physics explanation of black-body
radiation failed (ultraviolet catastrophe) - Plancks ad-hoc assumption of energy quanta
- of energy Equantum h?, leads to a
radiation spectrum which agrees with experiment. - old generally accepted principle of natura non
facit saltus violated - Opens path to further developments
3Problems from 1st lecture
- estimate Suns temperature
- assume Earth and Sun are black bodies
- Stefan-Boltzmann law
- Earth in thermal equilibrium (i.e. rad.
power absorbed rad. power emitted) ,
mean temperature T 290K - Suns angular size ?Sun 32
- show that for small frequencies, Plancks
average oscillator energy yields classical
equipartition result ltEoscgt kT - show that for standing waves on a string, number
of waves in band between ? and ??? is ?n
(2L/?2) ??
4Outline
- Introduction
- cathode rays . electrons
- photoelectric effect
- observation
- studies
- Einsteins explanation
- models of the atom
- Summary
5Electron
- Cathode rays
- During 2nd half of 19th century, many physicists
do experiments with discharge tubes, i.e.
evacuated glass tubes with electrodes at ends,
electric field between them (HV) - 1869 discharge mediated by rays emitted from
negative electrode (cathode) - rays called cathode rays
- study of cathode rays by many physicists find
- cathode rays appear to be particles
- cast shadow of opaque body
- deflected by magnetic field
- negative charge
- eventually realized
- cathode rays were
- particles named
- them electrons
6Photoelectric effect
- 1887 Heinrich Hertz
- In experiments on e.m. waves, unexpected new
observation when receiver spark gap is shielded
from light of transmitter spark, the maximum
spark-length became smaller - Further investigation showed
- Glass effectively shielded the spark
- Quartz did not
- Use of quartz prism to break up light into
wavelength components ? find that wavelength
which makes little spark more powerful was in the
UV
7Hertz and p.e. effect
- Hertz conclusion I confine myself at present
to communicating the results obtained, without
attempting any theory respecting the manner in
which the observed phenomena are brought about
8Photoelectric effect further studies
- 1888 Wilhelm Hallwachs (1859-1922) (Dresden)
- Performs experiment to elucidate effect observed
by Hertz - Clean circular plate of Zn mounted on insulating
stand plate connected by wire to gold leaf
electroscope - Electroscope charged with negative charge stays
charged for a while but if Zn plate illuminated
with UV light, electroscope loses charge quickly - If electroscope charged with positive charge
- UV light has no influence on speed of charge
leakage. - But still no explanation
- Calls effect lichtelektrische Entladung
(light-electric discharge)
9Hallwachs experiments
- photoelectric discharge
- photoelectric excitation
10Path to electron
- 1897 three experiments measuring e/m, all with
improved vacuum - Emil Wiechert (1861-1928) (Königsberg)
- Measures e/m value similar to that obtained by
Lorentz - Assuming value for charge that of H ion,
concludes that charge carrying entity is
about 2000 times smaller than H atom - Cathode rays part of atom?
- Study was his PhD thesis, published in obscure
journal largely ignored - Walther Kaufmann (1871-1947) (Berlin)
- Obtains similar value for e/m, points out
discrepancy, but no explanation - J. J. Thomson
111897 Joseph John Thomson (1856-1940) (Cambridge)
- Concludes that cathode rays are negatively
charged corpuscles - Then designs other tube with electric deflection
plates inside tube, for e/m measurement - Result for e/m in agreement with that obtained
by Lorentz, Wiechert, Kaufmann - Bold conclusion we have in the cathode rays
matter in a new state, a state in which the
subdivision of matter is carried very much
further than in the ordinary gaseous state a
state in which all matter... is of one and the
same kind this matter being the substance from
which all the chemical elements are built up.
12Identification of particle emitted in
photoelectric effect
- 1899 J.J. Thomson studies of photoelectric
effect - Modifies cathode ray tube make metal surface to
be exposed to light the cathode in a cathode ray
tube - Finds that particles emitted due to light are the
same as cathode rays (same e/m)
13More studies of p.e. effect
- 1902 Philipp Lenard
- Studies of photoelectric effect
- Measured variation of energy of emitted
photoelectrons with light intensity - Use retarding potential to measure energy of
ejected electrons photo-current stops when
retarding potential reaches Vstop - Surprises
- Vstop does not depend on light intensity
- energy of electrons does depend on color
(frequency) of light
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16Explanation of photoelectric effect
- 1905 Albert Einstein (1879-1955) (Bern)
- Gives explanation of observation relating to
photoelectric effect - Assume that incoming radiation consists of light
quanta of energy h? (h Plancks constant, ?
frequency) - ? electrons will leave surface of metal with
energy - E h ? W W work function
energy necessary to get electron out of the
metal - ? there is a minimum light frequency for a given
metal, that for which quantum of energy is equal
to work function - When cranking up retarding voltage until current
stops, the highest energy electrons must have had
energy eVstop on leaving the cathode - Therefore eVstop h ? W
17Verification of Einsteins explanation
- 1906 1916 Robert Millikan (1868-1963)
(Chicago) - Did not accept Einsteins explanation
- Tried to disprove it by precise measurements
- Result confirmation of Einsteins theory,
- measurement of h with 0.5 precision
- 1923 Arthur Compton (1892-1962)(St.Louis)
- Observes scattering of X-rays on electrons
-
18WHY CAN'T WE SEE ATOMS?
- seeing an object
- detecting light that has been reflected off the
object's surface - light electromagnetic wave
- visible light those electromagnetic waves that
our eyes can detect - wavelength of e.m. wave (distance between two
successive crests) determines color of light - wave hardly influenced by object if size of
object is much smaller than wavelength - wavelength of visible light between 4?10-7 m
(violet) and 7? 10-7 m (red) - diameter of atoms 10-10 m
- generalize meaning of seeing
- seeing is to detect effect due to the presence of
an object - quantum theory ? particle waves, with
wavelength ?1/p - use accelerated (charged) particles as probe, can
tune wavelength by choosing mass m and
changing velocity v - this method is used in electron microscope, as
well as in scattering experiments in nuclear
and particle physics
19Models of Atom
- J.J. Thomsons model
- Plum pudding or raisin cake model
- atom sphere of positive charge
- (diameter ?10-10 m),
- with electrons embedded in it, evenly
distributed (like raisins in cake) - i.e. electrons are part of atom, can be kicked
out of it atom no longer indivisible!
20Geiger, Marsden, Rutherford expt.
- (Geiger, Marsden, 1906 - 1911) (interpreted by
Rutherford, 1911) - get ? particles from radioactive source
- make beam of particles using collimators
(lead plates with holes in them, holes
aligned in straight line) - bombard foils of gold, silver, copper with beam
- measure scattering angles of particles with
scintillating screen (ZnS)
21(No Transcript)
22Geiger Marsden experiment result
- most particles only slightly deflected (i.e. by
small angles), but some by large angles - even
backward - measured angular distribution of scattered
particles did not agree with expectations from
Thomson model (only small angles expected), - but did agree with that expected from scattering
on small, dense positively charged nucleus with
diameter lt 10-14 m, surrounded by electrons
at ?10-10 m
23Rutherford model
- planetary model of atom
- positive charge concentrated in nucleus (lt10-14
m) - negative electrons in orbit around nucleus at
distance ?10-10 m - electrons bound to nucleus by electromagnetic
force.
24Rutherford model
- problem with Rutherford atom
- electron in orbit around nucleus is accelerated
(centripetal acceleration to change direction of
velocity) - according to theory of electromagnetism
(Maxwell's equations), accelerated electron emits
electromagnetic radiation (frequency revolution
frequency) - electron loses energy by radiation ? orbit
decays - changing revolution frequency ? continuous
emission spectrum (no line spectra), and atoms
would be unstable (lifetime ? 10-10 s ) - ? we would not exist to think about this!!
- This problem later solved by Quantum Mechanics
25Bohr model of hydrogen (Niels Bohr, 1913)
- Bohr model is radical modification of Rutherford
model discrete line spectrum attributed to
quantum effect - electron in orbit around nucleus, but not all
orbits allowed - three basic assumptions
- 1. angular momentum is quantized L n(h/2?)
n h, n 1,2,3,...
?electron can only
be in discrete specific orbits with particular
radii ? discrete energy levels - 2. electron does not radiate when in one of the
allowed levels, or states - 3. radiation is only emitted when electron makes
transition between states, transition also
called quantum jump or quantum leap - from these assumptions, can calculate radii of
allowed orbits and corresponding energy levels - radii of allowed orbits rn a0 n2 n
1,2,3,., a0 0.53 x 10-10 m Bohr
radius n principal quantum number - allowed energy levels En - E0 /n2 , E0
Rydberg energy
- note energy is negative, indicating that
electron is in a potential well energy
is 0 at top of well, i.e. for n ?, at
infinite distance from the nucleus.
26Energies and radii in hydrogen-like atoms
- For circular orbit, potential and kinetic
energies of an electron are - U -kZe2/R K mev2/2 kZe2/2R
- Total energy E U K -kZe2/2R
- radius for stationary orbit n
- Rn n2h2/mekZe2
- values of constants
- k 1/(4pe0) 8.98 109 N m2 /c2
- m e 0.511 MeV/c2
- h
- e elementary charge 1.602 10-19 C
- Z nuclear charge 1 for hydrogen, 2 for ?, 79
for Au -
- (needed for solution of problems)
27Ground state and excited states
- ground state lowest energy state, n 1 this
is where electron is under normal
circumstances electron is at bottom of
potential well energy needed to get it out
of the well binding energy binding energy
of ground state electron E1 energy to
move electron away from the nucleus (to
infinity), i.e. to
liberate electron this energy also
called ionization energy - excited states states with n gt 1
- excitation moving to higher state
- de-excitation moving to lower state
- energy unit eV electron volt
energy acquired by an electron when it is
accelerated through electric potential of 1
Volt electron volt is energy unit
commonly used in atomic and nuclear
physics 1 eV 1.6 x 10-19 J - relation between energy and wavelength
E h? hc/? , hc 1.24 x 10-6
eV m
28(No Transcript)
29Excitation and de-excitation
- PROCESSES FOR EXCITATION
- gain energy by collision with other atoms,
molecules or stray electrons kinetic energy of
collision partners converted into internal energy
of the atom kinetic - energy comes from heating or discharge
- absorb passing photon of appropriate energy.
- DE-EXCITATION
- spontaneous de-excitation with emission of photon
which carries energy difference of the two
energy levels - typically, lifetime of excited
states is ? 10-8 s
(compare to revolution
period ? 10-16 s )
30- Excitation
- states of electron in hydrogen atom
31Energy levels and emission Spectra
- En E1 Z2/n2
- Hydrogen
- En - 13.6 eV/n2
Lyman n 1
Balmer n 2
Paschen n 3
32- IONIZATION
- if energy given to electron gt binding energy, the
atom is ionized, i.e. electron leaves atom
surplus energy becomes kinetic energy of freed
electron. - this is what happens, e.g. in photoelectric
effect - ionizing effect of charged particles exploited in
particle detectors (e.g. Geiger counter) - aurora borealis, aurora australis cosmic rays
from sun captured in earths magnetic field,
channeled towards poles ionization/excitation of
air caused by charged particles, followed by
recombination/de-excitation
33Momentum of a photon
- Relativistic relationship between a particles
momentum and energy E2 p2c2 m2c4 - For massless (i.e. restmass 0) particles
propagating at the speed of light E2 p2c2 - For photon, E h?
- momentum of photon h?/c h/?
- (moving) mass of a photon Emc2 ? m E/c2 m
h?/c2
34Matter waves
- Louis de Broglie (1925) any moving particle has
wavelength associated with it ?? h/p - example
- electron in atom has ? ? 10-10 m
- car (1000 kg) at 60mph has ? ? 10-38 m
- wave effects manifest themselves only in
interaction with things of size comparable to
wavelength ? we do not notice wave aspect of us
and our cars. - note Bohr's quantization condition for angular
momentum is identical to requirement that integer
number of electron wavelengths fit into
circumference of orbit. - experimental verification of de Broglie's matter
waves - beam of electrons scattered by crystal lattice
shows diffraction pattern (crystal lattice acts
like array of slits)
experiment done by Davisson and Germer (1927) - Electron microscope
35QUANTUM MECHANICS
- new kind of physics based on synthesis of dual
nature of waves and particles developed in
1920's and 1930's. - Schrödingers wave mechanics (Erwin
Schrödinger, 1925) - Schrödinger equation is a differential equation
for matter waves basically a formulation of
energy conservation. - its solution called wave function, usually
denoted by ? - ?(x)2 gives the probability of finding the
particle at x - applied to the hydrogen atom, the Schrödinger
equation gives the same energy levels as those
obtained from the Bohr model - the most probable orbits are those predicted by
the Bohr model - but probability instead of Newtonian certainty!
- Heisenbergs matrix mechanics (Werner
Heisenberg, 1925) - Matrix mechanics consists of an array of
quantities which when appropriately manipulated
give the observed frequencies and intensities of
spectral lines. - Physical observables (e.g. momentum,
position,..) are represented by matrices - The set of eigenvalues of the matrix representing
an observable is the set of all possible values
that could arise as outcomes of experiments
conducted on a system to measure the observable. - Shown to be equivalent to wave mechanics by E.
Schrödinger (1926)
36Uncertainty principle
- Uncertainty principle (Werner Heisenberg, 1925)
- it is impossible to simultaneously know a
particle's exact position and momentum ?p?
?x ? h h/(2?) h 6.63 x 10-34 J ? s
4.14 x 10-15 eVs h 1.055 x 10-34 J ? s
6.582 x 10-16 eVs - (?p means uncertainty in our knowledge
of the momentum p) - also corresponding relation for energy and time
?E? ?t ? h h/(2?) - note that there are many such uncertainty
relations in quantum mechanics, for any pair of
incompatible - (non-commuting) observables.
- in general, ?P? ?Q ? ½??P,Q??
- P,Q commutator of P and Q, PQ QP
- ?A? denotes expectation value
37- from The God Particle by Leon Lederman Leaving
his wife at home, Schrödinger booked a villa in
the Swiss Alps for two weeks, taking with him his
notebooks, two pearls, and an old Viennese
girlfriend. Schrödinger's self-appointed mission
was to save the patched-up, creaky quantum theory
of the time. The Viennese physicist placed a
pearl in each ear to screen out any distracting
noises. Then he placed the girlfriend in bed for
inspiration. Schrödinger had his work cut out for
him. He had to create a new theory and keep the
lady happy. Fortunately, he was up to the task. - Heisenberg is out for a drive when he's stopped
by a traffic cop. The cop says, "Do you know how
fast you were going?" Heisenberg says, "No, but
I know where I am."
38Quantum Mechanics of the Hydrogen Atom
- En -13.6 eV/n2,
- n 1, 2, 3, (principal quantum number)
- Orbital quantum number
- l 0, 1, 2, n-1,
- Angular Momentum, L (h/2?) v l(l1)
- Magnetic quantum number - l ? m ? l, (there
are 2 l 1 possible values of m) - Spin quantum number ms ?½
39Comparison with Bohr model
Quantum mechanics
Bohr model
Angular momentum (about any axis) assumed to be
quantized in units of Plancks constant
Angular momentum (about any axis) shown to be
quantized in units of Plancks constant
Electron otherwise moves according to classical
mechanics and has a single well-defined orbit
with radius
Electron wavefunction spread over all radii
expectation value of the quantity 1/r satisfies
Energy quantized, but is determined solely by
principal quantum number, not by angular momentum
Energy quantized and determined solely by angular
momentum
40Multi-electron Atoms
- Similar quantum numbers but energies are
different. - No two electrons can have the same set of
quantum numbers. - These two assumptions can be used to motivate
(partially predict) the periodic table of the
elements.
41Periodic table
- Paulis exclusion Principle
- No two electrons in an atom can occupy the same
quantum state. - When there are many electrons in an atom, the
electrons fill the lowest energy states first - lowest n
- lowest l
- lowest ml
- lowest ms
- this determines the electronic structure of
atoms
42Problems
- The solar irradiation density at the earth's
distance from the sun amounts to 1.3 kW/m2
assuming all photons to have the wavelength at
the maximum of the spectrum (?max 490nm),
calculate the number of photons per m2 per
second. - how close can an ? particle with a kinetic
energy of 6 MeV approach a gold nucleus? (q?
2e, qAu 79e) (assume that the space
inside the atom is empty space)
43Summary
- electron was identified as particle emitted in
photoelectric effect - Einsteins explanation of p.e. effect lends
further credence to quantum idea - Geiger, Marsden, Rutherford experiment disproves
Thomsons atom model - Planetary model of Rutherford not stable by
classical electrodynamics - Bohr atom model with de Broglie waves gives
some qualitative understanding of atoms, but - only semiquantitative
- no explanation for missing transition lines
- angular momentum in ground state 0 (1 )
- spin??