IPR and technology transfer: myths and realities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

IPR and technology transfer: myths and realities

Description:

M #3: IPR favor developed countries. BC #1: Emerging economies are leading ... leaders in clean technology (Suzlon and Tata-BP) and India ranks fifth in total ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: Olivie64
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IPR and technology transfer: myths and realities


1
(No Transcript)
2
IPR and technology transfer myths and realities
  • M 1 IPR is a barrier to the transfer of
    technologies
  • M 2 IPR block innovation
  • M 3 IPR favor developed countries
  • BC 1 Emerging economies are leading the
    diffusion of clean technologies
  • M 4 IPR in clean technologies are similar to
    pharmaceuticals
  • BC 2 Technical capacity is attracting large
    investments in RD in emerging economies
  • M 5 IPR create a monopoly power and induce high
    prices
  • M 6 Sharing patents will increase technology
    diffusion
  • BC 3 Adapting technology and sharing learning
    experiences as drivers of success

mendiluce_at_wbcsd.org
Bonn, 11/6/2009, Page 2
3
Myth 1. IPR is a barrier to the transfer of
technologies
  • TNA identified economic and market barriers
    (80) as the greatest obstacles to technology
    transfer.
  • Graph Economic and market barriers to technology
    transfer

Source UNFCCC (2006)
mendiluce_at_wbcsd.org
Bonn, 11/6/2009, Page 3
4
Myth 1. IPR is a barrier to the transfer of
technologies
Redistered Patents in EST (1998-2008)
  • In most LDCs anyone is free to use inventions
    filed in other countries because no patent right
    exists
  • If technologies are nor been diffused in those
    countries is due to significant economic and
    capacity barriers.

215.000 patents
Source Copenhagen Economics(2009)
REALITY Patents are creations of national laws
Patents are one of the key drivers of technology
diffusion
mendiluce_at_wbcsd.org
Bonn, 11/6/2009, Page 4
5
Myth 2 IPR block innovation
  • IPR are key drivers of investment in RD,
    innovation and dissemination of EST
  • allow innovators to realize the value of
    successful RD investments (many RD programs
    fail)
  • stimulate investment in innovation that might not
    otherwise occur
  • provide companies with competitive advantage
  • IPR provide firms and innovators commercial and
    economic incentives and legal assurances to share
    ESTs and know-how, rather than keeping it secret
    for fear of compulsory licensing or
    misappropriation.

Source UNFCCC (2009)
REALITY a relaxation of IPR for the relevant
technologies would be a barrier to low carbon
technology innovation
mendiluce_at_wbcsd.org
Bonn, 11/6/2009, Page 5
6
Myth 3 IPR favor developed countries
  • Emergent economies today account for 20 of total
    patents worldwide, compared to less than 5 in
    1998.
  • 33 increase in local patent holder
    registrations in 1998-2008.
  • In China, 92 of new patent applications are
    local (40 of total)

Registered patents
x5
545
120
Source Copenhagen Economics(2009)
REALITY Patent protection is increasing in DC.
Further patent protection could stimulate
domestic innovation.
mendiluce_at_wbcsd.org
Bonn, 11/6/2009, Page 6
7
BC 1 Emerging economies are leading the
diffusion of clean technologies
  • Emerging economies are increasingly exporting
    technologies and manufacturing capacities abroad
  • China is a worldwide leader in renewable energy
    production, solar PV, and wind, through Suntech,
    Sinovel, China Wind Systems and Gold Wind (wind
    energy).
  • Indias companies are also among the world
    leaders in clean technology (Suzlon and Tata-BP)
    and India ranks fifth in total installed wind
    power.
  • Brazil is the world leader in biofuels, with
    Petrobras funding energy and carbon storage
    research and developing innovative biofuel
    technologies.

REALITY technology diffusion involves developed
and emergent countries companies. Capacity
building and economic development will be key for
the rest of DC to follow the trend.
mendiluce_at_wbcsd.org
Bonn, 11/6/2009, Page 7
8
Myth 4 IPR in EST similar to drugs
  • EST have different competitive advantages or
    business models than drugs
  • EST patent cost represents a small percentage of
    total development cost vs. 95 of total costs for
    some drug
  • Range of EST to reduce emissions involving
    multitude of patents vs. a single drug patent
    critical
  • In EST the cost of bringing new technology to the
    market relates to non- patentable aspects such as
    operations and maintenance, human capacity and
    training, and organizational procedures.

REALITY The diffusion of EST involves much more
than IPR and includes capacity building,
technological and business know-how, consumer
information and education, and regulatory
stability.
9
BC 2 Technical capacity attracts RD
investments in emerging economies
  • Engineering schools and institutes are annually
    supplying with 300.000 graduates in China and
    150.000 graduates in India.
  • Research institutes in emerging economies are
    developing considerable know-how and capacity in
    the clean technology space.
  • Hundreds of foreign-run RD centers have been
    established
  • Vestas, GE, Alstom, Gamesa, Siemens and others
    have major RD facilities in China and India,
    relying on large educated workforces, leading
    research institutes, and substantial economic
    potential.

REALITY Capacity building has driven the
emerging economies to lead in the adoption and
development of clean technologies.
mendiluce_at_wbcsd.org
Bonn, 11/6/2009, Page 9
10
Myth 5 IPR create a monopoly power and induce
high prices
  • Patents are very limited in scope (specific
    improvements or features) and IPR protected clean
    technology portfolios tend to be diverse,
    ensuring no one company holds all the patents to
    a particular solution. Competition between clean
    technologies, as well as across sectors, is
    intense, giving users broad choice at highly
    competitive prices.
  • No single company or nationality dominates the
    market for a particular technology (China -38 of
    solar energy- and Japan -28 of fuel cells).
  • In some cases, the newest and most expensive
    technology might not provide the best solution.
    In others key technologies might be already
    mature, meaning that non-IP protected solutions
    are often available.

Source Copenhagen Economics(2009)
REALITY Users can choose between IP and non-IP
protected technologies to achieve their policy
objectives. Competition ensure cost-effective
solutions.
mendiluce_at_wbcsd.org
Bonn, 11/6/2009, Page 10
11
Myth 6 Sharing patents will increase technology
diffusion
  • Technology is transferred through FDI (80 of
    capital inflow to DC), commercial cooperation
    agreements, JV, licensing and local training and
    technology cooperation.
  • Sharing patents has worked in other sectors (ITC)
    and might make sense sometimes in EST, however
    the complexity and diverse solutions require
    tailored investment frameworks and environments
    that encourage technology cooperation. One
    solution does not fit all
  • Investing in RD programs in DC provided solid
    patent protection will drive further RD (foreign
    and local), stimulates sharing protected
    innovation with local businesses and leads to
    effective commercial solutions.

REALITY Companies have an inherent interest in
encouraging diffusion of as many technologies as
possible. Patents are a tool to share knowledge
between businesses, which drives further
innovation.
mendiluce_at_wbcsd.org
Bonn, 11/6/2009, Page 11
12
BC 3 Adapting technology and sharing learning
experiences drivers of success
  • Engineering schools and institutes are annually
    supplying with 300.000 graduates in China and
    150.000 graduates in India.
  • Research institutes in emerging economies are
    developing considerable know-how and capacity in
    the clean technology space.
  • Hundreds of foreign-run RD centers established
    in China India
  • Vestas, GE, Alstom, Gamesa, Siemens and others
    have major RD facilities, relying on large
    educated workforces, leading research institutes,
    and substantial economic potential.

REALITY Capacity building has driven the
emerging economies to lead in the adoption and
development of clean technologies.
mendiluce_at_wbcsd.org
Bonn, 11/6/2009, Page 12
13
CONCLUSION
  • IPR enables the development and diffusion of low
    carbon technologies.
  • Business believes that negotiations should be
    grounded on factual technical information on the
    essential elements to effective technology
    deployment.
  • Experiences learnt and fast advances in some EST
    show the importance of providing
  • Returns to RD investments
  • Ensure good patent protection
  • A robust patent system encourages further
    innovation in the country.

REALITY IPR are an important policy tool to
drive private sector investment in clean
technology and give businesses the confidence to
invest in, disseminate and share the know-how and
technology
mendiluce_at_wbcsd.org
Bonn, 11/6/2009, Page 13
14
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com