Learning by doing or just doing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Learning by doing or just doing

Description:

The top of political interest is attained during early adolescence (Easton & Hess, 1962) ... count of type of SBEA activities involved in excluding proms and parties ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: FSC198
Category:
Tags: doing | learning

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Learning by doing or just doing


1
Learning by doing or just doing?
  • Conf. dr. Adrian Hatos

Participation in school based extracurricular
activities, associative membership and the
interest in politics of adolescent students?
2
The good democratic citizen
  • Actively involved in politics
  • Politically competent
  • Strongly attached to democratic values like
    tolerance
  • The Problem
  • Participation deficitDemocratic deficit
  • Lowered voter turnout are explained greatly by
    youth absenteism
  • Yout is less and less interested and informed in
    matters of politics (Hooghe, 2004)
  • The top of political interest is attained during
    early adolescence (Easton Hess, 1962)
  • It is, evidently a problem of political
    socialization

3
The political interest among Romanian youth is
relatively large
  • Adults
  • UE 17 (ESS, 2006)
  • România 20-25 (Com?a, 2007)
  • Youth
  • IEA 1999 anticipated political participation
    above the international average (Torney-Purta,
    2002)
  • 36 of youth declared themseves interested in
    national problems (Strâmbeanu, 2004)
  • For 90 of teenagers (aged 14 to18) entertainment
    is on the top of their concerns while politics
    comes last (Strâmbeanu, 2004)

4
Research questions
  • What is the distribution of political involvement
    of youth aged 13 to 18 in Oradea?
  • Which are the covariates of political
    participation of youth aged 13 to 18 in Oradea?
  • What is the effect of school based
    extracurricular activities on political
    participation of adolescents?

5
Educating citizens in school
  • The potential for civic socialization of formal
    civic education is quite limited (Galston, 2004)
  • Non/Informal civic socialization seems to be of
    great value student parliaments and
    organizations (Torney- Purta, 2002),
    participative methods are of greatest impact
    (Finkel, 2003)
  • Effectiveness of school-based extracurricular
    activities is to be assesed

6
Impact of SBEA (school based extracurricular
activities)
  • General positive effects (Feldman Matjasko,
    2005 Fredricks Eccles, 2005, 2006)
  • Structured SBEA have positive effects better
    school results, lower dropout rates, lowered
    incidence of drug consumption, better
    psychological adjustment, lower delinquence
  • SBEA effects depend on
  • Friends, peers, networks (ex. Crosnoe, 2002)
  • Type of activities (Feldman Matjasko, 2005)
  • SBEA effects on civic attitudes are less often
    approached
  • Zaff, Moore, Papillo, Williams, 2003
    consistent involvement in SBEA ? better academic
    results, prosocial behavior, 50 increase in
    probability of vote
  • Strambeanu (2005) school activism is an
    important covariate of political participation of
    adolescents aged 14 to 18

7
Predictors of adult political participation
  • Nie, Junn si Strehlik-Bahry (1996) verbal
    competence, organizational membership, network
    centrality and education.
  • Com?a (2007) Strongest predictors length of
    schooling, perceived political competence.

8
Other classes of predictors
  • SES
  • Education 1) status, status reproduction 2)
    competence and elimination of cognitive
    constraints
  • Gender political involvement is gender specific.
    Men are more involved in politics than women.
  • Voluntary membership
  • Putnamians involvement in voluntary associations
    is a fertilizer of social participation including
    that of democratic political participation and of
    generalized trust
  • Evidences Verba et al 1995 Niemi, 1998 Dekker,
    1997 Com?a, 2007.
  •  Critics it is not true that participation
    produces democratic attitudes
  • (Stolle, 1998 Uslaner, 2002, Rossteutscher,
    2002)

9
?
?
?
?
10
Data, variables, method
  • Second wave of survey Adolescents, future
    citizens. (november, december, 2007)
  • N2985 (grades 8-12) random, stratified,
    cluster sampling

11
Interest for politics
  • Additive scale of three Likert items
  • I know more about politics than most of the youth
    of my age
  • I am interested in politics
  • I feel close to the values, principles and the
    leaders of a political party
  • Missing values replaced with the item medians.

12
SBEA
  • Measure of SBEA participation count of type of
    SBEA activities involved in excluding proms and
    parties
  • Associative membership number of voluntary
    associations the person is member of (85 belong
    to no association, the average is 0,32)
  • Type of leisure 2 factor scores of six measures
    1) social leisure 2) cultivated leisure

13
Distribution of political index interest
alpha 0,82
14
Results
  • OLS regression
  • Path analysis

15
R20,13
16
(N2961 RMSEA0,037, CFI0,975 parametri
standardizati)
17
Conclusions
Class habitus
Gender
Political participation
  • Personal characterics -- social activism
  • Extroversion
  • Intelligence
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com