Deputy Chief of Staff, G8

1
2004 Tactical Wheel Vehicle Conference Current
to Future Force
Deputy Chief of Staff, G-8 LTG Benjamin S.
Griffin 2 February 2004
2
G-8 Mission
G-8 Organization
HQAF
HQNA
HQMC
Plans Programs
Resources, Rqmts Assessments
Programs Resources

• Responsible for the future
  
  Army through
• Programming
• Materiel Integration
• Integration of Army Focus
• Areas
• Studies and Analysis
• Develop, independently assess,
  
  
  integrate, and synchronize
  
  
  The Army Program (PAE)
• Materiel Program execution,
  
  Unit Set Fielding,
  joint materiel requirements and Doctrine,
  Organization, Training, Materiel Requirements,
  Leadership -Personnel and Facilities
• (DOTML-PF) integration (FD)
• Army Lead for Joint Requirements Oversight
  Council (FD),
  Quadrennial Defense Review, Defense Planning
  Guidance (QDR)
• Conduct analyses of Army forces and systems in
  joint and combined warfighting
  (CAA)
• Lead for Army Business Initiatives Council (BIC)
  represent Army in DoD BIC. Efficiency thru
  implementation of good ideas

Programs
Programming
Programs
Fiscal Division
Strategic Planning
Assessments
JROC Link
Fiscal Mgmt
Special Programs
OSD Link
G-8

Deputy G-8
SES
SES
Program Analysis Evaluation
Force Development
Center for Army Analysis
Army QDR Office
OSD (PAE) USD (Policy) USD (ATL)
Army Program (All Aspects) Independent Analysis
Hardware Divisions Unit Set Fielding DOTML-PF
Integration
Wargaming Warfight Analysis
DPG Studies Congressional Reviews Study
Integration
3
Capabilities Determination
Joint Capabilities Integration and Development
System
High
Joint Community will drive capabilities
determination in the future
Services were the key driver for requirements
determination in the past
Level of Analytical Effort
Services
Joint Community
(COCOMs/DoD/JS/Services)
Low
Today
Past
Future
OSD / Joint Staff Involvement Over Life Cycle of
a Program
Today
Past
Future
4
Joint Capabilities Integration and Development
System
JCIDS Joint Centric Services must be positioned
to INFLUENCE Joint Capabilities (Requirements)
Past Service Centric
Concept Development
Major Combat Ops
Stability Ops
Homeland Security
Strategic Deterrence
Services
ARSTAF
Network-Centric
Battlespace Awareness
Command and Control
Force Application
Protection
Focused Logistics
Service Requirements
Joint Capabilities
Requirements Generating System
G-8 Participation Coordination Integration
RQ
Senior Leadership COCOMs TRADOC Other
Services Capability
JCIDS Documents
Studies
Other Svc Req
Capability Gap Identification
Battlespace Awareness
Joint Requirements Panel
FDJ
JS Gatekeeper
Command and Control
Joint Requirements Board
Capability Development
Battlespace Awareness
Command Control
Force Application
Protection
Focused Logistics
Network Centric
Force Application
CJCSI3180
FM
BA FCB
C2 FCB
FL FCB
P FCB
NC FCB
FA FCB
Protection
Joint Requirements Oversight Council
Joint Capabilities Board
Focused Logistics
JROC
5
Army Organization for FCBs

• OIPT Reviews Program Prior to AROC.Reports thru
  2 Star GOSC

Command and Control
Network- Centric
Force Application
Protection
Focused Logistics
Battlespace Awareness
FCBs
J2 RADM Murrett
JFCOM J8 Brig Gen Rogers
J6 RADM Brown
J8 Maj Gen Scott
J4 Brig Gen Taylor
J8 RADM Mathis
JS
FDL LTC(P) Wyche
FDI COL Fountain
FDFCS COL St Pierre
FDC COL Woods
FDS COL Rodriguez
FDB COL Spoehr
G8
LTC Hickman
LTC Eberle
MAJ(P) Bodiford
LTC Linick
LTC Draxler
LTC Gay
FDJ
MAJ Campbell
MAJ Opphile
PAE
MAJ Kim
MAJ Schaefer
LTC Allen
LTC Fralen
SMS COL Chase
SMA COL Aultman
SCS COL Crizer
SC4 / SSI Ms. Quiroz / COL Justice
ASSALT
Army G4 COL Dunn
Army G2 Mr Aleshin
Army G3 COL Uberti
Army G6 COL Patterson
Army G3 COL Braun
Army G3 LTC Magee
ARSTAF Ctr Prts
Army G1 (Mr Lewis) advises all FCBs, as required
TRADOC Futures
COL Hayward
MAJ Espinosa
Mr Padgett
Mr Ordway
LTC Jenkins
LTC Avery
LOG OIPT SSO - L RSO S G4 ASSALT TRADOC
ISR OIPT FDI - L G3RQ S AASALT TRADOC
OIPTs FDD-MNVR FDV-AVN FDS-FIRES G3 AASALT
C4 OIPT FDC FDL FDT G3 G6 AASALT
OIPTs FDB-CBRNE AND MPs FDE-AMD AASALT TRADOC
Overarching Integrated Process Team (OIPT)
6
Acquisition, Capabilities, and PPBE The Changing
DoD Processes
Change 2 Revolutionary
Change 3 Emerging
Joint Capabilities Integration Development Syste
m (JCIDS)
Combatant Commander Integrated Priority List 29
Oct 2003
CJCS 3170.01C 24 June 03
VCJCS/Service Chief Oversight
Change 4 Emerging
Defense Acquisition System
Planning, Programming, Budgeting Execution
Process (PPBE)
Change 1 Evolutionary
Management Initiative Decision 901, 910,
913 Aldridge Study 31 Oct 03
Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) Oversight
DEPSECDEF Oversight
DoD 5000 Series 12 May 03 Revision
Aligning three formerly independent and
unsynchronized processes
7
The Way Ahead

• Train and Equip Soldiers and Grow Leaders
• The Soldier
• The Bench
• Army Aviation
• Leader Development and Education
• Combat Training Centers/Battle Command Training
  
  Program

Relevant and Ready Force
8
Where We Are Today....Truck Densities
Light Medium Heavy
FMTV 10T Dump
M35 2.5T
PLS w/PLS Trailer
M35/44 2.5 Ton 23,543 M809 5 Ton
8,408 M939 5 Ton 32,792 M1080/90 5 Ton
9,242 M1078/9 2.5 Ton 10,091
Total 84,076
HMMWV
HMMWV
HMMWV AO 78,885 HMMWV A1
8,091 HMMWV A2
7,080 HMMWV ECV 7,079
Total 101,135
M915 5,839 HEMTT 12,713 HET
2,693 PLS 3,541 Total 24,786
Trailers - 85,686
295,683 Systems
Fleet Age 17.5 yrs.
Fleet Readiness 87-93
9
Enhancing Our Capabilities
SBCTs
Force XXI
Early Deployers
Container Handling Unit
FMTVs
Container Handling Unit
7
27
8
FBCB2
Up-Armored HMMWV
FMTV
HEMTT LHS
1127
191
Up-Armored HMMWV
1213
2200
62
Palletized Load Handling System
FMTVs
12
53
29
63
FBCB2
Movement Tracking System
Forward Repair System
162
1200
760
HEMTT-Load Handling System
FBCB2
34
Forward Repair System
10
Tactical Wheeled Vehicle Support of OIF Efforts
TWVs in OIF QTY of Fleet OPTEMPO HEMTT
1,700 12
10Yrs/Yr PLS 1,000 27
10Yrs/Yr HET 1,000 43
10Yrs/Yr M915 1,200 21
10Yrs/Yr 2.5/5 Ton 7,435 9
9Yrs/Yr HMMWV 12,500 12
6Yrs/Yr UAH 1,886 Trailers
12,000 15 6Yrs/Yr Total
36,835 12
11
DCX/OIF Lessons Learned
Division Capstone Exercise
Operation Iraqi Freedom
Distribution
Handling Operations
C4I Capabilities
MTS
CHU
MTS
HEMTT-LHS with CROP

• MTS enabled in-transit visibility and BFT
• LCOP at the SBCT level enhanced Theater
• LCOP and support
• SATCOM required to operate along
• extended LOCs

• CHU, HEMTT-LHS, MTS, and CROP
• enhanced battlefield distribution
• Great integration of ground air resupply

Survivability
C4I Capabilities

• Diagnostics-Prognostics needed
• CSS digital systems must integrate
• with ABCS
• Log efficiencies more critical on the
• dispersed battlefield

M1114 Up-Armored HMMWV
Add-on Armor
MTS
SA BFT

• Units HMMWVs platforms required
• additional force protection
• FBCB2, MTS, LCOP enhanced Situational
• Awareness and Blue Force Tracking

• MTS provided in-transit visibility and near-
• real time communications
• No Digital Logistics Common Operating
• Picture (LCOP)

12
Lessons Learned Application to OIF/OEF

• Accelerated fielding of HEMTT-LHS, CROP and MTS
  to deploying units to enhance distribution.
• Provided a very limited Logistics Common
  Operating Picture capability to SBCT and EAD CSS
  units.
• Provided SATCOM to SBCT and EAD CSS units to
  enable operations over extended Lines of
  Communication (very limited).
• Increased the production and fielding of
  Up-Armored HMMWVs and Add-on Armor Kits for all
  TWVs.

13
Army Future Force Strategy

• Focused on supporting current operations while
  continuing our transformation efforts

• Provide necessary capabilities to Current Force

• Balance - Appropriate mix of
• Selective fielding of new equipment
  (modernization)
• Rebuild/upgrade of key existing systems
  (recapitalization)
• Preserve needed current equipment (maintenance)
• Procurement

14
Programs
FY 02
FUTURE FORCE
TRANSITION FROM FY02 TO FUTURE FORCE
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY02
FY04
FY05
FY06
FY03
CURRENT FORCE (HMMWV, FMTV, HEMTT, PLS, HET)
HMMWV contract ends FY07
FMTV contract ends FY08
SUSTAIN RECAP New Procurement
LT MED HVY
HEMTT Extended Service Program contract ends FY07
Current TWVs will support UA Increment 1
Threshold (2010-2012) and UE through 2030
HEMTT funding linked to ESP
PLS contract ends FY07
TECHNOLOGY INSERTIONS
HET Contract ends FY 04
M1A2sep Tanks in Service through 2020s
UA AND UE (FTTS ACTD MSV AND UV)
Future TWV Fleet
Advanced Concept Techology Demonstration
FTTS ACTD DETERMINES REQUIRED CAPABILITIES FOR UA
UE FUTURE REQUIREMENTS (OO) FOR FUTURE ARMYS
SUSTAINMENT VEHICLES
15
Fleet Readiness Future Roles
AVG. AGE
FUTURE ROLE
READINESS
KEY ENABLER
ITEM
C2, MANEUVER (MNVR), MNVR SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT
(SPT)
SBCT UA/UE
13.9
92
HMMWV
87
2.5/5 Ton
C2, MANEUVER (MNVR), MNVR SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT
(SPT)
SBCT UA/UE
19.9 (7 yrs)
95
FMTV
SBCT UA/UE
MNVR SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT (SPT)
92
8.2
PLS
MNVR SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT (SPT)
8.9
93
UE
HET
M915 Tractor
MNVR SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT (SPT)
87
9.0
UE
MNVR SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT (SPT)
87
HEMTT
UA/UE
14.8
C2, MNVR, MNVR SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT (SPT)
UA/UE
Trailor
24.4
94
16
TWV FY 04-09 Funding

• Tactical Wheel Vehicles resourcing for POM 04-09
  totals 8,961M
• The Army TWV FY04 Supplemental was 808.6M
• The Army TWV FY04-09 Budget (POM plus FY04
  Supplemental) is 9769M

17
Road Ahead for TWVs ...
HEMTT
FMTV

• Force Protection expanded to other TWVs ..
• HEMTTs, FMTVs, PLS ....
• Selective upgrade of systems based on
• operational experience, i.e., improved engine
• in HMMWVs.
• Load containerization and improved handling
• systems to facilitate ammo, fuel, and water
• delivery.
• Improved Command and Control systems

PLS
HMMWV
MLRS on a CROP
FMTV-LHS w/Container
Flatrack
Fuel Rack on HEMTT LHS
18
Conclusion

• Our priority one remains fielding Up-Armored
  HMMWVs and Add on armor kits to support the war
  fighter and war efforts.
• We must seek new approaches to developing
  solutions bold solutions spiral development
  of new technologies to enhance current force
  platforms. The challenge to industry is to
  accelerate development of cost affordable
  technology ... so that we maintain our
  warfighting edge.
• The Army is committed to finding, funding, and
  fielding affordable materiel requirements to meet
  future needs.
• The Army has accepted risk in current forces and
  capabilities in order to keep development and
  fielding of the Future Force on schedule.
• TEAM EFFORT!!

18
19
Questions?