Freya Margand - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Freya Margand

Description:

No tuition or training (one-time health & safety for TA excepted) ... Minimum federal grant administrative & managements met ... Federal grant requirements can ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: ams99
Category:
Tags: freya | margand

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Freya Margand


1

EPAs Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
ProgramPipeline Safety Trust Conference
  • Freya Margand
  • National TAG Program Manager
  • Contact margand.freya_at_epa.gov

2
TAG Background
  • CERCLA (sect. 117(e)) as amended by SARA (1986)
  • For independent technical assistance in
    interpreting information
  • To a groups of individuals affected by the site
  • From initial investigation through operation and
    maintenance
  • Initial award of up to 50,000
  • 20 match required
  • 1988 - TAG regulations finalized (40 CFR Part
    35).
  • October 2, 2000- last revision of regulations.
  • EPA policies
  • Regional staff program implementation
  • Headquarters policy issues, national
    publications, coordination and consistency among
    regions.

3
Use of TAG funds
  • Most of the funds for procuring a technical
    advisor to
  • explain site related technical information
  • make site visits to learn about activities
  • travel to meetings/hearings about site
  • evaluate site plans for reuse
  • interpret explain health-related information
  • Limited amount of funds for grant management and
    administrative expenses

4
Not Allowed
  • No lobbying
  • No travel for group members
  • No lawsuits or legal assistance/actions
  • No social activities, fundraising or entertaining
  • No tuition or training (one-time health safety
    for TA excepted)
  • No reopening or challenging final decisions.

5
Eligibility Requirements
  • Only one TAG at a time at a site
  • Listed on National Priorities List, or proposed
    with CERCLA action underway.
  • Group of individuals affected by site
  • Group is incorporated as nonprofit
  • Minimum federal grant administrative
    managements met
  • Must include 20 cost share in project budget

6
Ineligible Entities
  • No groups affiliated with national organizations
  • No academic institutions
  • No political subdivisions
  • No PRPs, or groups representing or receiving
    money from PRPs
  • No groups established by or sustained by any of
    the above

7
Competition Process
  • Interested group submits letter of intent (LOI)
    to regional EPA office
  • EPA notifies broader community of LOI in local
    newspaper(s)
  • 30 days for coalition-building or other LOIs
  • 30 days to complete application
  • 90 days to revise/clarify application per EPA
    comments

8
Criteria for Selection
  • Meets all minimum eligibility requirements
  • Ranking based on three equally-weighted criteria
  • Membership is representative of broader community
    interests
  • plan to use the technical advisor
  • plan and ability to inform the rest of the
    community

9
Funding
  • Initial award of up to 50,000 (by Statute)
  • Additional (non-competed) funding based on
    specific criteria
  • Groups grant management track record
  • Site characteristics meet 3 out of 10 under 40
    CFR 35.4065
  • TAG funding is cost recoverable in final
    settlement
  • EPA can use site-specific accounts to fund TAGs

10
TAGs Can Help
  • build trust
  • lend credibility to EPA information
  • create dialogue
  • foster more engaged community
  • community better articulate concerns/views
  • create better and more appropriate Agency
    decisions

11
Lessons Learned (EPA)
  • EPA must inform community and maintain open
    two-way communication
  • Clearly communicate what is and is not on the
    table for discussion (manage expectations)
  • Communicated with community directly, not through
    the TA
  • Recognize TAG group does not speak for the whole
    community
  • Must be prepared to provide a lot of support

12
Lessons Learned (Community)
  • Group must be well organized and well connected
    with broader community
  • Most success when group takes a problem-solving
    approach w/ TA
  • Group must be open to receiving information
    contrary to original views
  • Organization w/ identity built on mistrust and
    conflict ? unable to meaningfully engage broader
    community
  • Federal grant requirements can be burdensome
  • Can be difficult to find qualified technical
    advisors

13
Lessons Learned (TA)
  • Best if truly independent, not an advocate for a
    particular viewpoint
  • Qualities excellent communicator and
    approachable
  • Needs to communicate what is reasonable to expect
    from the cleanup process and their services
  • Should be based within a reasonable distance from
    community

14
For More Information
  • EPA TAG website at http//www.epa.gov/superfund/co
    mmunity/tag/index.htm
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com