BETTER AIR QUALITY 2004 SPECIFIC TRANSPORT MEASURES TO REDUCE EMISSIONS IN HYDERABAD, INDIA Yash Sac - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

BETTER AIR QUALITY 2004 SPECIFIC TRANSPORT MEASURES TO REDUCE EMISSIONS IN HYDERABAD, INDIA Yash Sac

Description:

Auto( 3 Seater) 7.6 5.0. Auto( 7 Seater) 1.0 0.7. Bus 41.3 27.6. Rail 0.3 0.2 ... As a result, 2-stroke two or three wheelers in Hyderabad contribute quite ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: yashsa
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: BETTER AIR QUALITY 2004 SPECIFIC TRANSPORT MEASURES TO REDUCE EMISSIONS IN HYDERABAD, INDIA Yash Sac


1
BETTER AIR QUALITY 2004SPECIFIC TRANSPORT
MEASURES TO REDUCE EMISSIONS IN HYDERABAD, INDIA
Yash Sachdeva, RITES LtdViresh Goel, RITES
LtdD.S.Chari, RITES Ltd6 - 8 DECEMBER,
2004AGRA, INDIA
2
TRANSPORTATION POLICIES FOR SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT
  • Typical policy alternatives to reduce emissions
    in developing countries have relied mainly on
    technology improvements
  • While technology improvement is desirable, the
    impacts of transportation policies on emissions
    also need to be considered
  • Maintaining mobility levels also important for
    sustainable development
  • This IES component should help policy makers
    understand the broader impacts of transportation
    policy

3
SCOPE OF WORK
  • Study components for Transportation
  • Part-I Scenarios for More Effective Public
    Transit Services
  • Part-II Traffic Management and Measures to
    improve Traffic Flow
  • Part-IIITechnology/ Training Measures relating
    to 2-stroke vehicles

4
STUDY AREA CHARACTERISTICS
STUDY AREA The area under jurisdiction of
Hyderabad Urban Development Authority(HUDA)
-1865sq.km POPULATION YEAR POPULATION
(MILLION) URBAN AGGL. HUDA Area 2001 5.7
6.4 2011 9.0 2021 13.6 Projected
Figures as per Master Plan for Hyderabad
Metropolitan Area-2020 REGISTERED MOTOR VEHICLES
(2002) TOTAL MOTOR VEHICLES
14.5 MILLION AUTO RICKSHAW 5
CARS JEEPS 13 TWO
WHEELERS 77
5
STUDY AREA
6
PRIMARY TRAFFIC TRAVEL SURVEYS
  • Road Network Inventory Survey
  • Speed and Delay Survey
  • Turning Movement Traffic Count Survey
  • Traffic Signal Time Survey
  • Parking Survey
  • Pedestrian Survey
  • Household Travel Survey(Activity Diary Stated
    Preference)
  • Passengers Opinion Survey(Public Pvt.Mode)
  • and Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Surveys

7
DIAGRAM OF TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT PROCESS
8
TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING
  • Takes raw inputs in the form of forecasts of
  • Population
  • Employment
  • Socio-demographic information
  • Spatial distribution of activities
  • Transportation networks and services offered
  • Produces forecasts of
  • Volume of traffic for each important link in a
    transportation network (for all modes)
  • Operating speeds along those links
  • Traffic volumes factored up to aggregate
    forecasts of PKT and VKT
  • Speed and aggregate volumes used to calculate
    emissions, using a vehicle emissions package
  • Feedback loop technique used to assess induced
    transport demand

9
MODAL SPLIT(2003)
  • MODE of Total Peron trips (only
    motorised)) (all person trips)
  • 2 Wheeler 46.6 31.0
  • Car 3.2 2.2
  • Auto( 3 Seater) 7.6 5.0
  • Auto( 7 Seater) 1.0
    0.7
  • Bus 41.3 27.6
  • Rail 0.3 0.2
  • Cycle -- 2.9
  • Cycle Rickshaw --
    0.2
  • Walk -- 30.2
  • TOTAL 100.0
    100.0
  • TOTAL TRIPS/DAY 8.2 Million

10
PART- I SCENARIOS FOR MORE EFFECTIVE PUBLIC
TRANSIT SERVICE
  • Business-As-Usual(BAU) Scenario
  • Further decline in bus ridership
  • Increase in use of personalized and IPT modes
  • Increase in traffic congestion on roads
  • Further decline in bus speeds which will lead to
    high travel time
  • Higher vehicle km by 2-wh,cars and auto rick.
  • Increase in emissions from motorized vehicles
  • Goal of this component quantify BAU and
    alternative public transport scenarios

11
ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS TO MAKE BUS TRANSPORT SYSTEM
MORE EFFECTIVE
  • Exclusive bus lanes/ways
  • Provision of adequate and well designed bus stops
  • Priority of buses at traffic signals
  • Bus Route Rationalization

12
DAILY VEHICLE KILOMETERS TRAVELLED(VKT) FOR STUDY
AREA
  • Business-As-Usual(BAU) Scenario ( in 000)
  • Mode 2003 2011 2021
  • Bus 695 942 1223
  • Auto 4499 5941 14799
  • Car 2542 3518 4851
  • 2-w 13556 23274
    30387
  • Total 21292 33675
    51260
  • More effective bus transit service scenario
  • Mode 2011 2021
  • Bus 1339 2184
  • Auto 2387 3939
  • Car 3380 4587
  • 2-w 19139 25479
  • Total 26245
    36189

13
ESTIMATED DAILY EMISSIONS FOR STUDY AREA(BAU
SCENARIO)
  • EMISSIONS IN TONNES PER DAY
  • 2003 2011
    2021
  • CO 630 1208 3045
  • PM 6 12 32
  • CO2 2916 5144 11238
  • CH4 30 61 171

14
REDUCTION IN EMISSIONS OVER BAU SCENARIO WITH
MORE EFFECTIVE BUS TRANSIT SYSTEM SCENARIO FOR
STUDY AREA
  • REDUCTION IN EMISSIONS IN TONNES PER DAY
  • 2011 2021
  • CO 327(27) 1410(46)
  • PM 4(35) 18(55)
  • CO2 688(13) 3793(34)
  • CH4 23(38) 102(59)
  • Figures in braces indicate the percentage
    reduction.

15
PART-II TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT AND MEASURES TO
IMPROVE TRAFFIC FLOW
  • Corridors
  • I. Sanathnagar to Nalgonda X Road Corridor
    (12.6 km)
  • II. Panjagutta to Secunderabad Corridor ( 8 km)
  • Three scenarios developed for the identified
    corridors viz.
  • BAU Scenario
  • GEP Scenario(Reduction of Side
    friction,Provision of Foot path,
    Synchronization of Traffic signals along
    with junction improvements to reduce
    intersection delays)
  • Flyover Scenario(for corridor from Sanatnagar
    to Nalgonda X Road)

16
DAILY EMISSIONS IN TWO IDENTIFIED CORRIDORS FOR
BAU SCENARIO
  • EMISSIONS IN TONNES PER DAY
  • Corridor I Corridor - II
  • 2011 2021
    2011 2021
  • VKT(000) 1778 2825 677 919
  • CO 75 246 26 51
  • PM 1 3 0.2 1
  • CO2 313 910 92 158
  • CH4 4 16 1 3

17
REDUCTION IN DAILY EMISSIONS OVER BAU FOR SIDE
FRICTION SCENARIO
  • REDUCTION IN EMISSIONS IN TONNES PER DAY
  • Corridor I Corridor -
    II
  • 2011 2021 2011
    2021
  • CO 15(20) 125(51) 1(4)
    10(19)
  • PM 0.2(26) 2(57) 0.01(4)
    0.1(25)
  • CO2 81(26) 511(56) 5(5)
    38(24)
  • CH4 1(25) 9(55) 0.1(4)
    1(24)
  • Figures in braces indicate the percentage
    reduction.

18
REDUCTION IN DAILY EMISSIONS OVER BAU FOR
PROVISION OF FOOT PATH SCENARIO
  • REDUCTION IN EMISSIONS IN TONNES PER DAY
  • Corridor I Corridor - II
  • 2011 2021 2011 2021
  • CO 14(19) 117(47) 1(4) 9(17)
  • PM 0.2(26) 2(53) 0.01(4)
    0.1(23)
  • CO2 78(25) 475(52) 5(50)
    34(21)
  • CH4 1(24) 8(52) 0.1(4)
    1(21)
  • Figures in braces indicate the percentage
    reduction.

19
REDUCTION IN DAILY EMISSIONS OVER BAU FOR
SYNCHRONISATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALSJUNCTION
IMPROVEMENT SCENARIO
  • REDUCTION IN EMISSIONS IN TONNES PER DAY
  • Sanatnagar-Nalgonda Corridor
  • 2011 2021
  • CO 14(18) 50(20)
  • PM 0.2(20) 1(21)
  • CO2 71(23) 209(23)
  • CH4 1(19) 3(21)
  • Figures in braces indicate the percentage
    reduction.

20
REDUCTION IN DAILY EMISSIONS OVER BAU FOR
FLYOVER SCENARIO
  • REDUCTION IN EMISSIONS IN TONNES PER DAY
  • Sanatnagar-Nalgonda Corridor
  • 2011 2021
  • CO 0.1(0.2) 33.4(14)
  • PM 0.1(8) 0.6(19)
  • CO2 20(6) 175(19)
  • CH4 0.4(8) 3(17)
  • Figures in braces indicate the percentage
    reduction.

21
PART-III VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY/ TRAINING MEASURES
RELATED OT TWO-STROKE VEHICLES
  • 80 of 2 Wheelers are with 2-stroke engines
  • 3 Wheelers are predominantly with 2-stroke
    engines
  • Fuels blended with lesser quality
    fuel(adulteration)
  • Inconsistent driving habits
  • As a result, 2-stroke two or three wheelers in
    Hyderabad contribute quite disproportionately to
    air quality problems.

22
TWO - STROKE MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS(MO)TRAINING
  • MO Training programs can spread awareness and
    reduce emissions.
  • Goal of component What is the envelope of
    improvement that can be expected, and how cost
    effective would that be?

23
REDUCTION IN DAILY EMISSIONS DUE TO M O
TRAINING PROGRAMS FOR 2-STROKE VEHICLES
  • REDUCTION IN EMISSIONS IN TONNES PER DAY for
    STUDY AREA
  • 2011 2021
  • CO 6 43
  • PM 0.1 0.5
  • CO2 9 70
  • CH4 0.4 3

24
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Improved bus transit can attract traffic from 23
    wheelers,cars and reduce emissions
    significantly.Therefore, more effective bus
    transit services should be provided.
  • Traffic Management Measures such as removal of
    side friction,segregation of vehicular and
    pedestrian traffic and synchronisation of traffic
    signals should be implemented on all the major
    corridors wherever feasible. These measures are
    low cost and very effective in reducing
    vehicular emission levels.
  • Although long flyovers attract higher traffic as
    compared to BAU scenario, they can still reduce
    emissions. However, construction of flyover
    should be planned carefully in view of the issue
    of sustainable development.
  • Training programs and publicity for better
    maintenance of vehicle and proper driving habits
    of 2-stroke vehicle drivers should be carried out
    regularly.

25
THANKS FOR YOUR TIME AND ATTENTION
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com