System level behaviour of VCSEL-based optical interconnects: a circuit-level simulation approach PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 23
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: System level behaviour of VCSEL-based optical interconnects: a circuit-level simulation approach


1
System level behaviour of VCSEL-based optical
interconnectsa circuit-level simulation approach
  • Michiel De Wilde
  • Electronics and Information Systems dept.
  • Olivier Rits
  • Information Technology dept.
  • Ghent University IMEC, Belgium
  • IST project Interconnect by Optics

2
Optical interconnect rationale
(www.intel.com)
3
Optical interconnect rationale (2)
  • Packet routers
  • Parallel and distributed processing systems

4
Optical interconnect rationale (3)
Wire capacitance resistance skin effect?
bit-rate limit
(Miller-Özaktas)
5
Optical interconnect rationale (4)
  • Physical solution use of optics
  • No electromagnetic wave phenomena (crosstalk)
  • Losses barely sensitive to distance frequency
  • Potential to scale much better than wires
  • Advantage in using optical interconnectsfor ever
    decreasing distances
  • From chip to chip onboard, and board to board

6
VCSEL-based parallel optical I/O
Multi-waveguide connectors (e.g. overmoulded POF
bundles)
Parallel waveguides (e.g. POF flexes)
Hybridised 2D photodetector array
Hybridised 2D VCSEL array
optical devices
silicon
7
Design space
8
Design space (2)
  • Continuously-valued design parameters as well
  • ?, operating currents, numerical aperture
  • Choices affect system-level characteristics
  • Technological feasibility (interoperability,
    yield)
  • Timing characteristics (delay, skew)
  • Reliability(spikes, power ? temperature,
    misalignment)
  • Monetary cost

9
Design space exploration
  • Tradeoffs between choices
  • Multi-objective
  • Counteracting effects
  • Find systematic way of making choices design
    methodology
  • Goal formalized into a design tool
  • The designer states system-level characteristics
  • The design tool assists in making product and
    parameter choices

10
Design methodology development
11
Design methodology focus step 1Predicting
effect of design alternatives
  • Issues for direct estimation(e.g. from tabular
    data)
  • Difficult prediction of noise/variation
    propagation
  • Dynamic multi-domain interactions (electrical,
    optical, thermal)
  • Implement framework for time-domain link
    simulation to
  • Estimate system-level properties for various
    setups
  • Verify behaviour of optical interconnect within a
    digital system (mixed-signal simulation)

12
Simulation frameworklink building block models
  • Circuit-level behavioural modelsinstead of
    physical models
  • Only time-dependent equations
  • No spatial dependency
  • Mixed-signal Verilog-AMS (or VHDL-AMS)instead of
    SPICE
  • Direct expression of differential equations
  • Native support for signals in different domains

13
Example photodiode model
module pin_photodiode(in,anode,cathode)
input in inout anode, cathode power
in electrical anode, cathode parameter
real Cdep0, Cbo0, Rbas0, Resp0,
Id0 parameter real pole-1/(CdepRbas)
parameter real laplace_coeff_0CdepCbo
parameter real laplace_coeff_1CdepCboRbas
charge rc analog begin
I(cathode,anode) lt laplace_zp(RespPwr(in)Id,,
pole,0) Q(rc) lt laplace_np(V(cathode,a
node),laplace_coeff_0,laplace_coeff_1,pole,0)
end endmodule
  • Terminals
  • Model parameters
  • Equations describing internal state and outputs

14
Simulation frameworkmodel hierarchy
15
Driver/receiver model
  • Normal analog electrical circuits
  • IP protection no real circuit provided

16
VCSEL model
  • Nonlinear 1st order differential equation system

(M.X. Jungo)
  • VCSEL characterisation is hard

17
Fiber-based optical path
  • Abstraction of dispersion (short distance)
  • TBD Statistical modelling of misalignment

18
Fiber bend losses
  • TBD Take into account that the mode
    distributions do not directly stabilise after a
    bend

19
Simulation features
  • Process corner simulation
  • Best-case or worst-case value for all model
    parameters
  • Lower and upper boundaries are not very tight
  • Statistical simulation (partly TBD)
  • Time-invariable statistics
  • Inter-process intra-process variations
  • Misalignment
  • Dynamic statistics
  • Noise (e.g. VCSEL RIN noise)
  • Effects like power supply spikes

20
Simulation example transient
1 link with 10dB attenuation in the optical path
(exaggerated VCSEL model parameters)
21
Conclusion
  • Framework for simulation of guided wave optical
    interconnect systems
  • Design methodology development enable prediction
    of system-level interconnect characteristics
  • Mixed-signal simulation of optical interconnect
    within a digital system
  • Operational, but not yet mature
  • Simulation is doable, characterisation is
    hard(especially statistical characterisation)

22
Acknowledgements
  • IST Interconnect by Optics Project
  • Helix AG driver/receiver block diagrams
  • Avalon Photonics VCSEL measurements
  • Hannes Lambrecht (Ghent University, IMEC-INTEC)
    macrobend losses
  • Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (Belgium)
    (F.W.O.)
  • Research assistantship

23
Thermal effects
  • Temperatures are difficult to predict
  • VCSELs are very temperature sensitive
  • Operating temperature of up to 85C
  • Temperature distribution in the simulation
  • Simulator implementation not difficult
  • TBD Estimate expected temperature differences in
    a VCSEL array
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com