National LightRail: Towards a National Optical Research Network - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

National LightRail: Towards a National Optical Research Network

Description:

Innovation 'Research can't be held hostage to what industry thinks the market want.' 'Infrastructure investments of the past are getting in the way of real innovation. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: david2012
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: National LightRail: Towards a National Optical Research Network


1
National LightRail Towards a National Optical
Research Network

2
NLR Footprint and Layer 1 Topology
SEA
POR
SAC
BOS
NYC
CHI
OGD
DEN
SVL
CLE
WDC
PIT
FRE
KAN
RAL
NAS
STR
LAX
PHO
WAL
ATL
SDG
OLG
DAL
JAC
3
National Light Rail
  • Dark Fiber National footprint
  • Serves very high-end Experimental and Research
    Applications
  • 4 - 10GB Wavelengths initially
  • Capable of 40 10Gb wavelengths at buildout
  • Partnership model

4
Rationale for NLR
  • Current market demonstrates willingness of
    private sector setting stage for strong
    partnership of academia, corporations and
    government
  • Research community in USA and worldwide working
    on large scale research and development
    applications calling for increasing bandwidth as
    evidenced by the Grid and Terascale projects
  • Unified approach best investment for biggest
    payoff for the most users
  • Federal program funding support focused on
    research and experimental applications needing
    significant network capacity
  • Leadership worldwide in research and education
    increasingly dependent upon large-scale
    collaborative research activities
  • Meet the future needs of the research and
    community most economically

5
Drivers and Motivations
  • RESEARCH Network research tools
  • EXPERIMENTAL Exp. infrastructure
  • OPERATIONAL 24/7 high performance
  • Aubrey Bush
  • NSF

6
Drivers and Motivations
  • Cost
  • Control
  • Flexibility
  • Responsiveness
  • Innovation
  • End-to-End networking

7
Why Fiber?
  • Capacity needed is not otherwise affordable
  • Capabilities needed are not available
  • Cheaper in the long range
  • Leverage with carriers
  • Insurance against monopoly behavior
  • Stable and predictable anchor points

8
Why Fiber? Innovation
  • Research cant be held hostage to what industry
    thinks the market want.
  • Infrastructure investments of the past are
    getting in the way of real innovation.
  • The situation is reminiscent of the telco
    infrastructure situation before APRANET.
  • Bob Kahn
  • CRA-Snowbird 02

9
Optical Transport - Light Rail
  • Multi-State interest in a larger geographic fiber
    based infrastructure
  • Vendors very interested in selling National
    footprint

10
Goals and Uses
  • Research! (including Network Research)
  • Experimentation in networking and in education
  • Regional fiber/ ? efforts in edu research
    sectors
  • Education
  • Academic Med. Center driven Clinical activities
  • Development implementation of network
    computing technologies not otherwise likely to be
    generally available commercially as early as
    needed in RE.
  • Enabling deterministic and other e2e bandwidth/
    ?s, dark fiber and conduit for Grid, eScience
    etc. for Regionals etc.

11
NLR Service Offerings
  • Waves!!!!
  • Dark Fiber
  • MetaPoP capabilities
  • Dedicated OC-192c or 10GE waves
  • No wave can interfere with others
  • Shared IP service
  • Must be able to tolerate outages
  • Supports experimental code
  • Subdivided waves for dedicated uses
  • Delivered as gigabit Ethernet

12
NLR Governance
  • LLC - Equity Partners
  • Joint Research Council
  • Joint Technology Council
  • Distributed Network Engineering/ Operations
  • Waves governed/managed by various groups

13
Backers
  • Carnegie Mellon/PSC
  • Virginia Tech
  • Duke
  • Georgia Tech
  • Florida
  • Texas

14
Backers
  • CENIC
  • PNWGP
  • NCAR
  • SURA
  • UCAID

15
Technology Partners
  • Cisco Systems
  • Level 3

16
COSTS
  • 80.2 MILLION
  • Over
  • 5 Years

17
NLR Footprint and Layer 1 Topology
SEA
POR
SAC
BOS
NYC
CHI
OGD
DEN
SVL
CLE
WDC
PIT
FRE
KAN
RAL
NAS
STR
LAX
PHO
WAL
ATL
SDG
OLG
DAL
JAC
18
National Light Rail Lambda Route Map
REGEN
TERMINAL
OADM
Metro 10 Gig E
4
Seattle
Chicago
Denver
Cleveland
Kansas
Ogden
Boise
4
2
4
4
6
2
6
4
Salt Lake City
Portland
StarLight
2
Boston
5
Pittsburgh
Sacramento
2
Sunnyvale
15808 LH System
15808 ELH System
2
4
4
Fresno
15540 Metro System
4
10 Gig E
4
New York City
Washington DC
OC192
4
Los Angeles
2
4
4
2
Stratford
4
San Diego
4
4
Walnut
Nashville
Dallas
Raleigh
Olga
Pheonix
Atlanta
4
19
NLR POP Architecture
Long Haul OC48/OC192/10GigE DWDM
NLR
DWDM
10 Gig E or OC192
Gig E
20
Calren/DC/HPR/NLR POP Architecture
CalRen DC
HPR
NLR
Long Haul OC48/OC192/10GigE DWDM
DWDM
10 Gig E or OC192
Gig E
CalREN/DC
HPR
NLR
15500
21
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com