SURVEY OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 66
About This Presentation
Title:

SURVEY OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Description:

'Federal government expenditures as a percentage ... Trend in the United States federal government budget. Outlays % of GDP. 41.9. 15.6. 17.3 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 67
Provided by: duaneb2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SURVEY OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS


1
SURVEY OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
  • LECTURE 6

2
Two Generic Classifications of Goods with Unusual
Characteristics
  • PUBLIC GOODS
  • FINANCIAL GOODS

3
  • This lecture looks at public goods and presents
    an overview of public sector economic principles.

4
This lecture focuses on the underpinnings of
the mixed economies Mixed economies are
fundamentally market economies but have large
public sectors
5
MAIN POINTS
  • PUBLIC SECTOR
  • JUSTIFICATIONS FOR GOVERNMENT IN A MARKET ECONOMY
  • FUNCTIONS OF GOVERNMENT
  • POSITIVE EXTERNALITIES
  • NEGATIVE EXTERNALITIES
  • MARKET FAILURES
  • SOCIAL COSTS
  • SOCIAL BENEFITS

6
Growth in Government inMarket Economies
7
TOTAL GOVERNMENT OUTLAYS AS PERCENTAGE OF GDP IN
1999
  • COUNTRY OUTLAYS
  • U.S. 33.6
  • JAPAN 39.2
  • U.K. 40.8
  • GERMANY 47.1
  • ITALY 49.2
  • FRANCE 54.1
  • SWEDEN 60.2

8
(No Transcript)
9
Trend in the United States federal government
budget
10
(No Transcript)
11
Explanations for growth in Government
  • The government as provider of public goods and
    eliminator of externalities
  • The government as redistributor of income and
    wealth
  • Interest groups as a cause of government growth
  • Bureaucracy as a cause of government growth
  • Fiscal Illusion

12
Basic Economic Laws ExplainingGovernment
Economic Activity
13
  • LAW OF EXTERNALITIES IN CERTAIN CASES THE MARKET
    FAILS TO CAPTURE THE FULL COSTS OR BENEFITS OF
    FREE -MARKET DECISIONS.
  • PRINCIPLE OF PUBLIC GOODS GOODS THAT ARE
    COLLECTIVE AND NONEXCLUDABLE WILL BE UNDER
    SUPPLIED BY THE MARKET.

14
  • TENDENCY LAW OF SOCIAL REDISTRIBUTION
    REDISTRIBUTION OF SOCIETAL WEALTH BY GOVERNMENT
    COERCION TENDS TO REDUCE ECONOMIC INCENTIVES.
  • PRINCIPLE OF FREE-RIDING IN LARGE GROUP
    DECISIONS WHEN GOODS YIELD COLLECTIVE BENEFITS ,
    INDIVIDUALS WILL TEND TO UNDERSTATE THEIR
    MARGINAL PREFERENCES FOR THE GOOD.-- IF THE GOOD
    IS PRODUCED I WILL BENEFIT WHETHER I PAY OR NOT.

15
WHAT DISTINGUISHES THE PRIVATE SECTOR AND THE
PUBLIC SECTOR ?
16
  • 1. THE PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE FOR
  • RUNNING PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
  • ARE ELECTED BY THE GENERAL
  • POPULATION.
  • 2. THE GOVERNMENT IS ENDOWED
  • RIGHTS OF COMPULSION.
  • -- EMINENT DOMAIN
  • -- POWER TO TAX

17
PERVASIVENESS OF GOVERNMENT
18
  • 1. IT SETS THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK
  • WITHIN WHICH ALL PRIVATE
  • ACTIONS TAKE PLACE .
  • IT ACTS AS A PRODUCER OF , FOR
  • EXAMPLE , EDUCATION, SECURITY....
  • . IT ACTS AS A CONSUMER OF
  • GOODS AND SERVICES.

19
ECONOMIC ROLE FOR GOVERNMENT
20
  • ADAM SMITHS INVISIBLE HAND
  • -- GUIDANCE OF SELF-INTEREST / INCENTIVES
  • GOVERNMENT PLAYS A ROLE AS
  • THE VISIBLE HAND / COERCION

21
Adam Smith and the Role of Government in a
Market Economy
22
In the Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith enumerated
four justifiable functions of government the
duty of protecting the society from violence and
invasion by other independent societies the
duty of protecting every member of society from
injustice and oppression of every other member of
society the duty of establishing and
maintaining those highly beneficial public
institutions and public works which are of such a
nature that the profit they earn could never
repay the expense to the individuals to provide
them and which it, therefore, cannot be expected
that they would be supplied in adequate
quantities and the duty of meeting expenses
necessary for support of the sovereign
23
GOVERNMENT AS A RESPONSE TO DISAPPOINTMENTS WITH
THE MARKET
24
  • GOVERNMENT AND THE LAWS OF ECONOMICS / TRY TO
    REPEAL THE LAWS OF ECONOMICS
  • GOVERNMENT AND THE REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH /
  • INCENTIVE VS. EQUITY

25
  • GOVERNMENT AND MARKET FAILURES
  • -- STABILIZATION OF THE
  • ECONOMY
  • -- REALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
  • -- EXTERALITIES
  • -- NEGATIVE
  • -- POSITIVE
  • -- SOCIAL/PRIVATE COSTS
  • -- SOCIAL /PRIVATE BENEFITS

26
  • -- PUBLIC GOODS
  • -- NONEXCLUDABLE
  • -- COLLECTIVE
  • -- FREE-RIDER ISSUE
  • GOVERNMENT OPTIONS
  • -- TAKING DIRECT ACTION
  • -- NATIONALIZATION
  • -- PROVIDING INCENTIVES FOR
  • THE PRIVATE SECTOR
  • -- TAX BREAKS, SUBSIDIES

27
  • -- MANDATING ACTIONS IN THE
  • PRIVATE SECTOR
  • -- COMBINING THE ABOVE OPTIONS
  • GOVERNMENT ACTION AND PUBLIC
  • FAILURES
  • -- GOVERNMENT CAN FAIL JUST
  • LIKE MARKETS

28
NEGATIVE EXTERNALITIY
29
  • For negative externalities MSC gt MSB
  • A third party effect in the form of a MEC exists
    in the case of negative externalities. So the
    true marginal cost is MSC MPC MEC.
  • The free market tends to over-produce goods that
    create negative externalities in their
    production.
  • The issue is how do we internalize the
    externality so the market makes a correct
    allocation decision.

30
SBT PURE PRIVATE COST
PBT
MARKET PRICE IS TOO LOW
D
QBT
SOCIALLY INEFFICIENT OUTPUT
31
SAT SOCIAL COST
SBT PURE PRIVATE COST
TAX
PAT
PBT
D
QBT
QAT
32
SAT SOCIAL COST
SBT PURE PRIVATE COST
TAX
Consumer Price
PAT
Tax Wedge
PBT
Producer Price
PAT
D
QBT
QAT
33
SAT SOCIAL COST
SBT PURE PRIVATE COST
TAX
PAT
PBT
PRIVATE MARKET PRICE
D
QBT
QAT
PURE PRIVATE MARKET SOLUTION
34
SAT SOCIAL COST
SBT PURE PRIVATE COST
TAX
PRICE INCLUDING SOCIAL COST
PAT
PBT
PRIVATE MARKET PRICE
D
QBT
QAT
PURE PRIVATE MARKET SOLUTION
SOCIALLY EFFICIENT OUTPUT
35
POSITIVE EXTERNALITIY
36
  • For positive externalities MSB gt MSC
  • A third party effect in the form of a MEB exists
    in the case of negative externalities. So the
    true marginal benefit is MSB MPB MEB
  • The free market tends to under-produce goods that
    create negative externalities in their
    production.
  • The issue is how to we internalize the
    externality so the market makes a correct
    allocation decision.

37
SBS PURE PRIVATE BENEFITS
MARKET PRICE IS TOO HIGH
PBT
D
QBS
SOCIALLY INEFFICIENT OUTPUT
38
SBS PURE PRIVATE BENEFITS
SAS SOCIAL BENEFITS
SUBSIDY
PBT
PAS
D
QBS
QAS
PURE PRIVATE MARKET SOLUTION
39
SBS PURE PRIVATE BENEFITS
Producer Price
SAS SOCIAL BENEFITS
PAS
PBT
Per Unit Subsidy
Consumer Price
PAS
D
QBS
QAS
PURE PRIVATE MARKET SOLUTION
40
SBS PURE PRIVATE BENEFITS
PRIVATE MARKET PRICE
SAS SOCIAL BENEFITS
SUBSIDY
PBT
PAS
PRICE INCLUDING SOCIAL BENEFIT
D
QBS
QAS
PURE PRIVATE MARKET SOLUTION
SOCIALLY EFFICIENT OUTPUT
PURE PRIVATE MARKET SOLUTION
41
PURE PUBLIC GOODS
42

MARGINAL SOCIAL COSTS
200
MARGINAL SOCIAL BENEFITS
0
10
QUANTITY OF PURE GOOD
43

MARGINAL SOCIAL COSTS
200
MARGINAL SOCIAL BENEFITS
70
d1
0
10
QUANTITY OF PURE GOOD
44

MARGINAL SOCIAL COSTS
200
130
MARGINAL SOCIAL BENEFITS
70
d2
d1
0
10
QUANTITY OF PURE GOOD
45
EFFICIENT OUTPUT OF A PURE PUBLIC GOOD
46
  • THE EFFICIENT PRODUCTION OF A PURE PUBLIC GOOD IS
    THAT LEVEL OF OUTPUT AT WHICH THE MARGINAL SOCIAL
    BENEFITS,OBTAINED BY VERTICALLY SUMMING THE
    DEMAND CURVES OF ALL CONSUMERS, EQUALS THE
    MARGINAL SOCIAL COSTS ( OPPORTUNITY COST OF
    RESOURCES USED TO PRODUCE THE GOOD)

47
Under Construction
Public Choice
48
  • Public choice theory is a positive approach to
    explaining government activities. It is based on
    self-interest motives by the public and the
    bureaucracies. Essentially, the difference
    between political and economic behavior is not a
    difference in human motives, but a difference in
    the rules and institutions governing human
    interaction in the two spheres.

49
Collective Decision Making
50
  • In a democracy the majority is suppose to rule.
  • What does this imply about resource allocation?
  • Particularly when voting on issues is generally
    indirect.

51
Theories of Public Decision - Making
52
  • Majority Voting and the Median Voter
  • In public policy decisions whose preferences
    dominate?
  • How is the optimal amount of public goods decided
    upon.
  • How are individual preferences revealed?

53
Group Decisions and the Free-Rider Problem
54
  • In group decision-making there is a problem of
    revealing true preferences.
  • Pure public goods once produced are shared
    equally by all.
  • Why should you reveal your true preferences and
    pay for something you will receive free?
  • Why not be a free-rider?

55
Voting and Resource Allocation
56
  • Direct Majority Voting
  • Lets look at a three voter model
  • The total cost -- tax financing -- is to be
    shared equally
  • The MSC of each unit is 30
  • dA , dB , dC individual demand functions for
    the public good. These functions represent the
    marginal benefits to the individual voters.

57

30
MSC
Public Goods
58
30
MSC
dC
dB
dA
Public Good
59
30
MSC
10
MC
dC
dB
dA
Public Good
60
30
MSC
10
MC
dC
dB
dA
2
4
10
Public Good
61
30
MSC
26

13
MSB

10

dC
dB
3
dA
2
4
10
Public Good
62
Increase in Cs intensity of demand
30
MSC
26

MSB
13
MSB

dC

dC
dB
3
dA
2
4
10
Public Good
63
  • In majority voting, an equilibrium occurs at the
    level of output of public goods where any
    proposal either to increase or decrease output
    would be opposed by a majority.
  • Majority rule is in equilibrium at the quantity
    favored by the median voter, so called median
    voter model.
  • Characteristics of Majority Voting
  • The only voter fully satisfied is the median
    voter.
  • The model indicates why so many people feel that
    government is not responsive to their individual
    wants.

64
  • Majority voting is likely to be unresponsive to
    changes in individual wants -- it ignores the
    intensity of individual preferences. See dC in
    the diagrams we just discussed.
  • There is no inherent tendency for majority voting
    to produce efficient policies i.e., output
    where MSB MSC.

65
The Voting Paradox
66
  • Nobel laureate Kenneth Arrow proved the
    remarkable result that all voting systems yield
    mathematical inconsistencies and indecision.
  • Inconsistencies are inherent in the
    decision-making process of democratic government.
  • The only way to ensure that consistent choices
    are made is to entrust all decisions to a single
    individual.
  • But this ceases to be a democracy.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com