Title: Ethics and Public Policy: the Science and Society Programme
1Ethics and Public Policy the Science and Society
Programme
Maurizio Salvi, MD, PhD Directorate General
Research European Commission
2Ethics and RD Policy Current Activities
3 Eurobarometer Survey 2001
- Divergent views on science and society among the
European population.
- Main messages of the survey
- 80 of Europeans believe that science will one
day overcome diseases such as AIDS or cancer,
but - 46 of Europeans are both uninformed and
uninterested in science - Citizens do not always trust science and
scientists 80 believe authorities should
oblige scientists to observe ethical rules - Young people do not find scientific studies
andcareers very attractive
4European Research Area
- The internal market for knowledge and research
- The Lisbon Summit (March 2000) conclusionEuropea
n Union to be developed into a knowledge based,
dynamic and competitive economy - Measures to boost RTD spend towards 3 of GDP by
2010 (Council decision of Barcelona March 2002) - Renewed impulse
- Commission Communication September 2002More
Research for Europe (3 GDP) - Commission Communication October 2002ERA -
Providing a new momentum
5 Science Society
Action Plan
society
towards synergy between
science
- scientists - citizens -
politicians
policy
6Science and Society Areas
- 4.3.1 Scientific advice, governance and
reference systems - 4.3.2 Ethics
- 4.3.3 Uncertainty, risk, and implementing the
precautionary principle - 4.3.4 Scientific and technological culture,
young people, science education and careers - 4.3.5 Women and science
7The ethical dimension
- Dialogue information exchange between ethics
groups - horizontal councils/local committees
- international dialogue
- observatory
- Raising awareness of researchers
- information and debate
- training material
- codes of conduct
- Deepening understanding of ethical questions
- ethics and scientific research / ethics and EU
policies - integrity of researchers
- infrastructures and methodologies
8Science and Society Areas
- Action Plan
- Action 29 Set up information and documentation
observatory for ethical issues - Action 30 Establish public dialogue on ethics in
science - Action 31 Raise scientific researchers
awareness of ethical issues
9Science and Society Areas
- Action Plan
- Action 32 Foster local and national networks of
ethical committees - Action 33 Develop international dialogue on
ethical principles - Action 34 Protect animals used in scientific
research
10Science and Society Areas
- Research on Ethics
- research on ethics in relation to science,
technology developments and their applications
11Science and Society Areas
- Comparative research, foresight and impact
studies on ethical issues in relation to science
and technology developments and their
applications. The emphasis is on cross-cutting
questions relevant to a number of research areas
(e.g. information society, nanotechnologies,
human genetics and biomedical research in food
technologies), that cannot be addressed within
the integrated projects of the relevant thematic
priorities.
12Science and Society Areas
- Implementation in 2003 The focus will be on
addressing emerging ethical questions in
research, and on developing recommendations on
how to address them in order to improve
understanding of ethics in the European Research
Area.
13Life sciences and biotechnology A strategy for
Europe
- Action 20 the Commission will encourage public
debates on biotechnology between scientists,
industry and civil society, including specific
interest groups, such as patients groups,
farmers, consumers, women, and young people,
focussing on specific technological developments,
to raise public interest in such developments and
offer early information on potential benefits and
risks.
14Life sciences and biotechnology A strategy for
Europe
- Action 25 While respecting cultural pluralism,
the Commission will work with public and private
partners to identify areas where it is possible
to establish consensus on ethical
guidelines/standards or best practise. Areas
might include stem cell research, human biobanks,
xenotransplantation, genetic testing and
transgenic animal research. Such guidelines could
take the form of self-regulatory initiatives in
the scientific community and industry.
15 Ethical Review under FP6
- http//europa.eu.int/comm/research/science-society
/ethics/rules_en.html
16 General Rules
"All the research activities carried out under
the Framework Programme 2002-2006 must be carried
out in compliance with fundamental ethical
principles.
A proposal which contravenes fundamental ethical
principles.shall not be selected. Such a
proposal may be excluded from the evaluation and
selection procedures at any time.
17 No-go Areas-
Areas excluded from funding under FP6
- Human cloning for reproductive purposes
- Germline gene therapy (research relating to
cancer treatment of the gonads can be financed.) - Creating human embryos solely for the purpose of
research or of stem cell procurement, including
by means of somatic cell nuclear transfer - ? Until Dec. 2003
- No funding of research on human embryonic stem
cells with the exception of banked or isolated
human embryonic stem cells in culture
18Ethical review and monitoring
- As part of the evaluation process an ethical
review will be implemented systematically at EU
level for proposals dealing with ethically
sensitive issues. - In specific cases, further ethical review may
take place during the implementation of a project
19the ethical review
- in the evaluation process
20Applicants are requested
- to confirm that the proposed research does not
involve
- Research activity aimed at human cloning for
reproductive purposes - Research activity intended to modify the genetic
heritage of human beings which could make such
change heritable - Research activity intended to create human
embryos solely for the purpose of research or for
the purpose of stem cell procurement, including
by means of somatic cell nuclear transfer - Research involving the use of human embryos or
embryonic stem cells with the exception of banked
or isolated human embryonic stem cells in culture
21The ethical review will be performed
- After a positive scientific evaluation
- By a multidisciplinary panel of experts
- With the possibility of adjusting and improving
proposals that impinge on fundamental ethical
principles (rules for participation) - The report of the ethical review will be part of
the technical annex
22What do they discuss?
- Ensure Article 3 of FP6 is fulfilled
- Ensure that the proposers properly address
ethical issues arising from the research - Make sure that research fulfils all ethical
and/or legal requirements at national, EC and
international level - Allows for possibility of excluding research
projects that contravene fundamental ethical
principles (see rules for participation)
23Evaluation procedure including
the ethical review
Call for Proposals
Receipt of full proposal
Receipt of outline proposal
Evaluation of Outline Proposals
Receipt of full proposal
Evaluation of full proposals
Final ranking lists
Ethical Review
Inform Programme Committee
Commission decisions on rejected proposals
Rejection of full proposals
Contract Negotiation
Negotiation Failed
Commission decisions on proposals accepted for
funding
24Follow up
- Reporting and follow-up to outcome of ethical
review
25Ethical management
- IP foresee specific ethical management within the
project if required - In this case the ethical reporting is linked to a
management component in the project - NoE - no specific ethical management - but if it
felt necessary, ER panel might for example
recommend an ethicist be included on management
board
26 Ethical Audit
- Or in cases where the reporting is not done in a
transparent way
?An ethical audit may be implemented
27 Ethical Audit
FP6 Rules of Participation - 16 December 2002
The Commission or any representative authorised
by it, shall have the right to carry out
scientific, technological and financial audits on
the participants, in order to ensure that the
indirect action is being or has been performed
under the conditions claimed and accordance with
the terms of the contract.
Implementing provisions for FP6 instruments
Ethical audits may be launched at any time
during the implementation of the project in order
to verify that the project is respecting
fundamental ethical principles and national
regulations
28SUMMARY
If the research projects is dealing with ethical
issues, the project proposal has to inform about
the ethical justification and on the foreseen
management of the ethical issues.
The scientific evaluation panel has to indicate
whether an ethical review is required
Research Proposal
Info on ethics
After positive scientific evaluation and when
indicated by the scientific panel, an Ethical
Review is conducted on the basis of European
regulations (incl. the conditions formulated in
the FP.) Contract Negotiation based on the
comments of the scientific evaluation and the
ethical review.
Scientific evaluation
Before the start of the Research project
Approval of the competent national authorities
(local ethical committees) must be given
Ethical Review
Technical annex including the specific
recommendations of the ethical review
National Approval
National Approval
National Approval
National Approval
The annual report of projects dealing with
ethical issues should include a chapter on the
management of these ethical issues.
CONTRACT
Ethics in the techn. annex
In the case of a second research phase requiring
approvala system of monitoring should be
established. National authorities approval must
be checked
Annual Report
Ethical issues
Annual Report
Ethical Issues
If concerns arise during the project an ethical
audit can be performed.
If ethical requirements are not followed, the
contract can be terminated
Ethical Monitoring/audit
29Further Information
- Further information on ethics requirements and
rules are given at the science and ethics website
at - http//europa.eu.int/comm/research/science-society
/ethics/ethics_en.html