NASA Exploration Team Message

1
The View from HQAstrophysics at
NASAJeffrey J. E. HayesProgram Executive for
MO DAApril 12, 2006
2
Science Mission Directorate Structure
3
Science Mission DirectorateFY 2007 Budget
4
FY07 NASA Budget (M)
5
FY06 vs. FY07 Budget Comparison
6
Science Budget Strategy

• To support Space Operations Mission Directorate
  requirements within a fixed Agency budget,
  reductions to previous Science planning are
  necessary
• Science gets 1.5 growth from FY06 to 07, 1 per
  year thereafter
• 3.1B decrease from FY06 Budget runout
• Strategy for Adjustments
• Develop an executable program based on strategic
  National Academy science priorities

7
Budget Comparison by Theme
8
Astrophysics Division

• Whats Changed
• SIM LRD no-earlier-than 2015/2016 TPF deferred
  Keck Outriggers cancelled
• JWST cost growth estimates incorporated for 2013
  LRD
• HST SM-4 scheduled for early FY 2008
• A review of SOFIA will be held in 2006 in order
  to determine the best course of action
• GLAST completed a schedule and cost re-baseline
  mainly due to development problems with the LAT
  LRD no-earlier-than September 2007
• Kepler confirmation baseline established WISE
  confirmation review conducted, budget assumes the
  project will enter development in 2006
• Research Analysis funding reduced approximately
  15
• Herschel and Planck budgets adjusted to reflect
  changes in schedule
• A re-plan of the Beyond Einstein Program (LISA,
  Con-X and JDEM) will be conducted to determine
  which mission will be selected to proceed first
• Whats Stayed the Same
• Chandra operations and data analysis will
  continue through 2011
• Spitzer operations will continue through lifetime
  of cryogenic mission
• Maintain support for NASA work associated with
  Herschel and Planck
• Ap SR to be held in April for review of smaller
  operating missions

9
Astrophysics Content of FY07 Budget
10
Astrophysics Missions
11
Astrophysics Division Operating Missions Status
12
Science Mission Directorate Major Changes