ADSUO GOSC 25 Jun 01

1
ADSU-O GOSC25 Jun 01
ADSU-0 GOSC 25 Jun 01
2
GOSC Mission
On 25 June 2001, 0800 - 1200, ADS XXI TF
conducts annual meeting of OPMS XXI General
Officer Steering Committee. MACOMs, Career Field
Coordinators, and ARSTAF principal attendees
receive OPMS XXI implementation and Council of
Colonels update. Refine issues and develop
recommendations to present to the CSA for the
Army Development System Update - Officer (ADSU-O)
decision briefing on 20 July 2001.
3
GOSC Agenda

GOSC Agenda

GOSC Agenda
0800 - 0805
Welcome Remarks
LTG
Maude
0805 - 0810
Admin Announcements
LTC Fletcher
0810 - 0830
Road to ADSU-O / OPMS XXI
Overview
COL Cutler
0830 - 0910
ODAP 1, SHRM (DCSPER)
COL Cutler
- Status of Authorizations
MAJ Lukens
0910 - 0920
ODAP 2 OPM Policies (DMPM)
COL Knoblauch
0920 - 0930
ODAP 3 CF Based OPMS (FAMDD)
COL Baker
0930 - 0935
ODAP 5
USAR
LTC
Yatsko
0935 - 0940
ODAP 6 ARNG
COL Reynolds
0940 - 0945 ODAP 7 OPCF (
CAC
)
COL Buckley
0945 - 0950 ODAP 8 IOCF (CAC)
COL Buckley
0950 - 0955 ODAP 9 ISCF (
DAS
)
COL Thomas
0955 - 1000 ODAP 10 OSCF (AMC)

Ms
Darby
1000 - 1015
BREAK
1015 - 1045 ODAP 4 Officer Education
System (
CAC
)
COLGriswold

- ILE Update
COL
Griswold
1045 - 1130
Validate issues and recommendations
for ADSU-O
COL Cutler
1130 - 1200
Finalize agenda for the ADSU-O
COL Cutler
4
OPMS XXI

• Most identifiable features
• - Career Field - Based Officer
• Management System
• - Resident MEL 4 for all OPMD -
• managed
  majors
• Most important feature Holistic system concept
  
• with venue for reviews and updates to Army
  leadership
• The New OER is a key enabler, but is not
  addressed by this ADSU-O

5
Quality ILE

• Pre - OPMS XXI CGOSC MEL 4 / JPME1
• 1997 OPMS XXI Study 100 Army competitive
  category (ACC) attend resident MEL4 so every
  field grade officer has the education to man
  key CF, BR and FA jobs
• 1998 CGSC feasibility study Determines 100
  Army officer resident MEL4 attendance is
  prohibitively expensive increased TTHS and
  joint impacts viewed as most significant
• 1999 GEN Reimer decision Make education more
  appropriate to what field grade officers will be
  doing in their career fields, conduct pilot
  programs through FY03, and fully implement by FY
  04
• 2001 Army Training and Leader Development Panel
  Report - Officer (ATLDP-O) Provide all majors
  with a quality resident ILE based on OPMS XXI,
  giving them a common core of Army operational
  instruction and CF, BR, FA training and education
  to prepare them for future service in the Army.
  Full spectrum operations require this.

Issues - ILE Proponency and accreditation
- CF / BR / FA education for IO/IS/OSCF
- ILE Attendance policy
- RC access
Common Core MEL 4
6
Developing Leaders for the Objective Force
2000
2003
2010
Legacy Force
Sustain Recapitalize
Transform
Objective Force
Objective Force
RD
Procurement
and
ST
Transform
Tech Solutions
Interim Force
Interim
Initial BCT
First Unit Equipped
First Interim BCT
Technical WO
Enlisted
Career Timelines
Aviation WO
Years Active Federal Service
Officer
3
10
8
12
13
17
21
22
27
2
4
5
0
7
A Strategic Approach to Officer Development

• OPMS XXI Final Report
• Combine all officer development systems into
  one overarching system
• Conduct annual reviews and updates for the CSA

• Products
• Updated ODAPs
• Updated ODS PLAN

Council of Colonels 22 - 23 May 01
General Officer Steering Committee 25 Jun 01
ODAP Leads/ Action Officers 20 Apr 01
Guidance
CSA ADSU-O 20 Jul 01
Issues Environment



Proactive Decisions
Regular, Cyclic Feedback
Adapts to Change


Vertical Horizontal
Holistic
8
CoC Recommendations Summary
BOTTOM LINE Stay the Course - Minor Adjustments
Required
1a. Use TDA CENDOC to discipline and coordinate
structure changes 1b. Conduct a re-coding
conference 2. Reevaluate MOCS process,
streamline and make responsive to
Transformation 3. Code selected TSS CSL
positions as branch immaterial 4. Determine
attendance policy for Universal ILE 5.
Consolidate ILE program management at TRADOC with
concomitant resourcing 6. ILE Common
Core FA / Br Specific. Common Core MEL 4.
FA / Br Specific documented under
schools attended 7. Quality of execution for
off - Leavenworth Common Core 8. Review
AERS, ACS and TWI to determine applicability to
CF - based officer management system and
Transformation 9. CFD in OSCF 100 FA 48
officers when they start training
9
Other Initiatives
- Are the current Battalion Command Selection
List (CSL) process and command requirements
appropriate or has OPMS XXI changed the necessity
for command?
Recommendation Review the qualitative
definition of what constitutes a CSL command
billet.
- Do current functional areas remain valid
requirements for classification of officer skills
and behavior for the objective force? - Are
Career Field proponencies assigned correctly?
Recommendation Review OPMS to determine the
validity and alignment of the functional areas
with proponency of the Career Fields.
10
OPMS XXI Career Fields
TRADOC
10
Inst Spt
15
Op Spt
9
Info Ops
DAS
Operations
66
AMC
11
OPMS XXI Proponent Responsibility
39 PSYOP/CA 90 M-F Logistician 24 Information
systems engineering 30 Information Opns 34
Strat Intel 40 Space Opns 46 Public Affairs 53
Information Systems Mgmt 57 Simulations Opns 48
Foreign Area Officer 51 Army Acq Corps 43 HR
Manager 45 Comptroller 47 Academic Prof,
USMA 49 ORSA 50 Force Mgmt 52 Nuclear Research
Opns 59 Strat. Plans Policy
AD Air Defense AG Adjutant General AR Armor AV
Aviation CM Chemical EN Engineer FA Field
Artillery FI Finance IN Infantry MI Military
Intelligence MP Military Police OD Ordnance QM
Quartermaster SC Signal Corps SF Special
Forces TC Transportation Corps
BOS Intel, Maneuver, Fires Air Defense, M/CM,
CSS, C2
IOCF TRADOC
OPCF TRADOC
OSCF AMC
ISCF DAS
JAG Judge Advocate General Corps CH
Chaplain HSC Health Services MC, VC, DC, MSC, ANC
TRADOC School System
12
OPMS XXI - Design Criteria

• Enhance warfighting capability of the Army
• - Increase MAJ branch qualification time
  - Goal is 24 months
• Average BQ time increased from 13.0 to
  15.7 months
• - Reduce turbulence for officers in units
  - Goal is 36 months
• Average time on station increased from
  21 to 27 months
• Provide all officers with reasonable opportunity
  for success
• - Provide viable career opportunity for
  officers outside of the command track
  
• Balance grades and skills at field grade level
• - Reduce upward grade substitution
• - Increase level of fill
• - Improve experience levels of colonels

Amber
Amber
Green
Red
Amber
Red
13
OPMS XXI OFFICERDEVELOPMENT ACTION PLANS
CSA DECISIONS
14
Strategic Human Resource Management
ODAP 1
Lead DCSPER as of 15 Jun 01
CSA Decisions 1, 2, 3, 10, 14, 16, 21, 23, 24
Status Red
Key Actions
ODAP 1 Establish a Strategic Human Resource
Management System

G A R

• Adopt a strategic holistic approach to future
  personnel system design
• Provide Army leadership with annual update
• Establish implement CF-based officer
  management system (Active Component)
• Revise rewrite AR 600-3
• Revise rewrite DA Pam 600-3
• Establish mechanism to align authorizations
  Inventory

Goal Evolve to Army Development System

Target Completion Date BCT FUE

• Key Decision Points
• ATLDP recommendation for single Army Proponent
  for training and Leader Development
• Creation of ADS Coord. Office (ADSCO)
• Transformation OOs
• Proponent alignment (AR 600-3)
• Revise DA Pam 600-3
• Alignment of authorizations and Inventory
• ADSU-O Decision brief to CSA

HOLD
15
Current Status of Authorizations

• HQDA, DAPE-PRP

16
OPMS Goals Revisited

• Increase war-fighting by.
• increasing S3/XO time for majors and,
• increasing Bn and Bde Cmd opportunity for those
  in the OPS track
• Build the bench of officers qualified in required
  skills
• Provide viable career tracks for officers in
  nontraditional skills
• Provide reasonable promotion opportunity
• Improve the field grade operating inventory to
  authorizations match

17
OPMS Metrics Status

• Inventory modeling Assumed all promotions
  equal at max possible to meet DOPMA ceiling, THS
  scaled back from current values to programmed
  value by rank and branch/FA specific continuation
  (FY99) new FAs use Army average (FA24FA53)
• Branch Qualification Time since all branches
  compete against each other, goal for all should
  be 24 months (within small deviation) over CFD
  will detract from this

CA Armor and Engineer lowest CS Intelligence
extremely low, Chemical and Signal still much
below CA average, PsyOp extremely high CSS
Quartermaster is lowest and all branches below CA
averages
18
OPMS Metrics Status LTC Cmd

• Inventory modeling Same assumptions with OPMS
  XXI counts of branch or hard-coded commands
  (plus FA90)
• All other commands (01A or branch immaterial)
  not included in these counts

CA wide range of opportunities from 27 (SF)
to 71 (IN) CS range of opportunities from
19(FA39) to 54 (MP) CSS range of
opportunities from 37 (TC) to 56 (FI)
19
OPMS Metrics Status COL Cmd

• Inventory modeling Same assumptions with OPMS
  XXI counts of branch or hard-coded commands
  (plus FA90)
• All other commands (01A or branch immaterial)
  not included in these counts

Branch Qualification Metrics
COL SEL
BdeCmd
2yr Opp
11
IN
29
38
66.0
12
AR
16
16
51.5
CA wide range of opportunities from 19 (SF)
to 95 (EN) CS range of opportunities from
10 (FA39) to 55 (MP) CSS range of
opportunities from 31 (AG) to 55 (FI)
13
FA
28
21
37.6
14
AD
10
7
36.2
15
AV
19
24
62.7
18
SF
16
6
19.0
21
EN
24
45
94.9
25
SC
23
13
28.2
31
MP
12
13
55.1
35
MI
28
16
29.0
74
CM
7
4
29.6
39
PsyOp
5
1
9.6
42
AG
11
7
30.7
44
FI
4
4
45.3
88
TC
16
12
36.5
91
OD
24
23
47.4
92
QM
19
21
54.6
20
Inventory to Authorization Metrics
Inventory pyramid depicts FG Oper Inv for the
branch or FA based on CFD number, specific
attrition and equal promotion opportunity set a
maximum allowable under constraints of DOPMA
(Title X). Number to left of block is raw count,
ratio in block is the count divided by COL, and
blocks are approximately sized to show ratio
relative size. Auths pyramid reflects current
documented authorizations that require the
specific branch or FA Evaluation of
HEALTH Total Operating strength exceeds
auths Operating Strength meets/exceeds
auths by grade if short, can upward
substitution cover ? excesses will
either work 01A (02A, 90) or upward sub
excesses should increase (as proportion) with
rank Ratio of Auths similar proportion (or
larger) to Operating strength due to increasing
immaterial capability in higher ranks Other
professional development metrics of BQ,
experience, command, etc based on subsets of
positions within total auths

XX
1
COL
100
2.5
250
LTC
4.4
MAJ
440
790
80
1
215
2.7
5.3
430
725
21
Branch Health Metrics



FA
SF
EN

39


OD
QM
1
1
1
151
77
117
1
25
1
1
136
109
398
2.6
234
3.0
357
3.0
3.4
87
333
288
2.5
2.6
142
5.6
548
3.6
306
4.0
502
4.3
458
531
3.4
4.9
1097
617
976
254
927
928

Current UAD Auths
29
31
1
1
40
47
120
12
1
1
1
1
3.0
3.4
87
104
6.1
214
5.4
155
3.3
310
2.6
73
239
8.2
255
8.2
460
11.5
223
4.7
398
3.3
165
13.8
355
390
250
714
425
828
Inv Tgt based on std targets and assumptions,
Current auths do not include wedges
22
FA Health Metrics







43
45
49
50
59
48
51
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
40
54
24
36
19
123
171
2.4
2.8
2.2
2.8
3.0
3.0
3.0
87
155
71
107
57
297
481
2.8
3.8
4.3
4.3
4.3
2.9
3.9
112
209
103
154
82
359
657
779
1309
297
239
418
198
158

Current UAD Auths
1
1
1
1
1
136
190
36
47
35
21
23
1
1
2.2
2.7
2.0
2.2
4.5
5.2
72
105
157
110
70
3.0
294
518
2.9
2.2
3.3
173
4.8
96
2.0
234
6.9
84
4.0
66
299
628
729
1336
281
248
426
215
159
Inv Tgt based on std targets and assumptions,
Current auths do not include wedges
23
FA Health Metrics(cont.)





24
30
46
53
57
1
1
1
1
1
15
23
33
14
9
51
3.5
72
3.2
111
3.4
43
3.0
29
3.0
4.7
4.1
4.7
4.3
4.3
69
92
153
62
41
135
119
187
297
79

Current UAD Auths
8
4
28
23
8
1
1
1
1
1
47
5.9
27
6.8
69
2.5
92
4.0
35
4.4
10.5
19.5
3.4
8.0
4.0
84
78
96
185
32
139
109
193
300
75
Inv Tgt based on std targets and assumptions,
Current auths do not include wedges
24
Conclusion

• Transition to new AOCs developed by OPMS XXI is
  essentially complete
• Most are close to original targets
• All are supportable/feasible (FA57 borderline due
  to total size) and support transformation
  requirements
• Others need work CMD Plan, FDU, MOCS
• Initial OPMS XXI authorizations never intended as
  a final solution
• over-structure in TAADS being addressed by TAA
• TAA and Command Plan process is charged with
  keeping structure in-line with manpower
  constraints
• CENDOC of TDA supports this effort

25
Officer Management Policy
CSA Decisions 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 11, 13, 15, 19,
20, 22
ODAP 2
Lead DCSPER as of 15 Jun 01
Status Green
Issue Institutionalizing OPMS XXI

Key Actions
G A R

• Transition ACC FG officers into 4 - CFs
• Transition from CDPL to CSL
• Transition DA selection board processes
• 15 YGs CFDd
• Conducted 8 CFD Appeals Boards
• Conducted 3 COL / 3 LTC OPMS XXI CSL Bds
• Postured for OPMS XXI Promotion Process
• Established AC / RC Bn Cmd Exchange

Goal Establish and Sustain CFs and CF Focus
for FG officers


Completed Target Date FY 04
Key Accomplishments

• Key Milestones
• CY 99 1st CSL Bd
• CY 00 1st AC / RC Cmd Exchange
• FY00 1st steady-state CSC Bd
• FY 00 1st steady-state SSC Bd
• May 01 1st steady-state CFD Bd (YG91)
• May 01 YG 75-79 CFD Bd
• Jul 01 1st OPMS XXI Prom. Bd (COL, Army)
• Aug 01 FY01 Last CSC Bd
• Sep 01 last transition CFD Bd (Yg84 /85)

complete
complete
complete
complete
complete
26
Career Field Based Officer Personnel Management
System
CSA Decisions 3, 4, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 21
ODAP 3
Lead PERSCOM as of 14 Jun 01
Status Green
Key Actions
Issue Need to revise DA PAM 600-3 and AR 600-3
to reflect evolution and changes in officer
management as OPMS changes and properly define
Proponent roles and responsibilities

G A R

• Develop Career Field Designation process
• Execute assignments by branch and functional
  area
• Execute Career Field Designation for Transition
  Year
• Groups
• Assist in revision of DA PAM 600-3 and AR 600-3

Goal Maintain an officer management system
that is responsive to Army requirements and
officer needs
Target Completion Date FY 01

• Key Decision Points
• Update and approve DA PAM 600-3
• Update and approve AR 600-3
• Update and approve CFD appeal and transfer
  criteria by updating AR 614-100
• Assess impact of Career Field Designation and
  current OPMS practices on promotion and school
  selection as OPMS based boards are implemented

27
Army Reserve OPMS XXI
ODAP 5
Lead OCAR as of 14 Jun 01
CSA Decisions 25
Status Green

Key Actions
Issue Determine proper Structure and Training
of OPMS XXI Functional Areas for the Army Reserve
G A R

• New Functional Area recoding
• DA Pam 600-3 Input
• New Functional Areas Training/Funding
• Determine Future Functional Area Management
  Policies

Goal Integrate OPMS XXI Functional Areas into
the Army Reserve
Target Completion Date FY 02

• Key Decision Points
• FA coding requirements/missions
• RC-accessible FA training established
• Future FA life-cycle management
• Assess ILE actions

28
OPMS XXI Implementation in ARNG
ODAP 6
Lead ARNG as of 14 Jun 01
CSA Decisions 25
Status Green


Key Actions
G A R
Issue MOS-Q of ARNG officers (RC) Are ARNG
officers MOS-Qualified when reassigned into
positions coded for FAs in operational
units? Goal Establish OPMS XXI in the Army
National Guard Target Completion Date FY 02

• Transition to New OER Complete
• Update NGB Pam 600-3 Complete
• Recoding Complete
• Functional Area Designation
  Complete
• Link ARNG LDAP with ODAP
  
• Life Cycle Management System Assessment
  
• Assess PME Impact
  Complete
• Develop / Modify Special Career Paths
  Complete
• Share Lessons Learned
  

• Key Decision Points
• Revision of NGB Regulations and Pams
• Assignment of Personnel to recoded positions
• Identify Training and Funding Requirement for POM
  input
• Evaluate Life Cycle Management System is

29
Operations Career Field
ODAP 7
Lead TRADOC as of 21 June 01
CSA Decisions 4.1 4.2, 17.21
Status Amber
Key Actions
Issue Need to ensure the OPCF Officer Is
prepared to confidently and competently lead
soldiers in the New Operational Environment

G A R

• Develop Consolidation CF responses
• Develop Actions / Programs in Support of OPMS
  XXI
• Initiatives
• Develop Manage ODAP
• Review Recoding work w/DCSPER/ MACOMs
• Assess Implications of ILE Redesign
• Monitor Analyze CF Designation results,
  promotion trends,
• development plans
• Update DA Pam 600-3 to reflect ILE redesign and
  additional
• education requirements
• Integrate ALDTP recommendations into the ODAP

Goal Establish the OPCF and transition to Army
Development System XXI Target Completion Date
FY 02

• Key Decision Points
• Maintain ACS for Ops CF Officers
• Update of AR 600-3 and DA Pam 600-3

30
Information Operations Career Field
ODAP 8
Lead TRADOC as of 14 Jun 01
CSA Decisions 9
Status Amber
Key Actions
Issue Establish an Information Operations (IO)
Career Field (CF)

G A R

• Obtain funding for Qualification Courses in FY
  02
• Convene CF Conference
• Identify and resolve IO CF issues
• ISC attendance policy for IO CF FA officers
• Monitor education and training POM requirements
• Monitor CF designation / structure
• Monitor development of FA Officer Qualification
• Courses
• Monitor and assess Colonel Promotion Board
• Document in regulatory guidance the roles and
• responsibilities of the CF Coordinator

Goal Transition CF to Army Development System
(ADS)

Target Completion Date FY 02

• Key Decision Points
• Funding for new FA Officer Qualification
• Courses
• Intermediate Service College attendance
• policy for IO CF Functional Area officers
• IO CF FA TOE / TDA structure / Army
• Transformation
• Update of AR 611-1 and DA Pam 611-21
• Update of AR 600-3 and DA Pam 600-3

31
Institutional Support Career Field
ODAP 9
Lead DAS as of 14 Jun 01
CSA Decision 8
Status Amber
Key Actions
Issue Integrate the Institutional Support
Career Field into Army Processes and Procedures.

G A R

• Conduct Detailed Analysis for FA ILE Resources
• Gain FA ILE Resource Approval
• Resource ILE in Army budget and POM
• Approve FA 59 SAMS Attendance
• Initiate DA Pam 600-3 Update
• Initiate AR 600-3 Update
• Army Approval of Separate Career Field
  Management
• Implement TDA CENDOC

Goal Develop motivated, competent,
experienced officers that validate the ISCF
all Army ISCF functions.

Target Completion Date FY 08

• Key Decision Points
• Approve FA ILE
• Resource FA ILE
• Approve FA59 SAMS Attendance
• Maintain Separate Career Field Management
• Amend DA Pam 600-3
• Amend AR 600-3
• Implementation of TDA CENDOC

32
Operational Support Career Field
ODAP 10
Lead AMC as of 14 Jun 01
CSA Decisions 5, 6, 7
Status Amber
Key Actions
Issue Institutionalize the Operational Support
Career Field

G A R

• Establish Operational Support Career Field
  Complete
• Establish an OSCF Coordination Cell
  Complete
• Realign FAO, AAC in OSCF Complete
• Conduct Semi-annual Forum
• Identify CF Issues
• Proponent input prior to position recoding of
  TAADS
• Revise how we access and career field designate
  the
• FA 48 officer--want to mirror the AAC officer
• Develop the UAS as an Army program

Goal Maintain a Viable CF that Encompasses the
Tenents of OPMS XXI
Completion date FY 02

• Key Decision Points
• Documentation of FA 48 Positions
• FAO Accessions and CFD
• Uniformed Army Scientist Program

33
Officer Education System
ODAP 4
Lead TRADOC as of 21 June 01
CSA Decisions 13, 14, 15, 17
Status AMBER
Key Actions
Issue Need to revise the officer education
system to better prepare field grade officers for
the 21st Century.

G A R

• Conduct Detailed Studies for OPMS Initiatives
• Convene OES Conference
• Identify OPMS OES Issues
• Integrate OES Initiatives within each of the
  four Career
• Fields
• Implement ILE Way Ahead
• Assist in implementation of OES initiatives
• Integrate OPMS OES Initiatives into Army and TR
  TXN
• Plans
• Establish Functional Proponency for OES

Goal Implement officer education system
improvements into OPMS officer development
system. Targeted Completion Date FY 04

• Key Decision Points
• Approve and Implement ILE
• Approve Slating and Attendance Policy
• For CGSOC
• Resource Distance and Life-Long Learning

34
Summary

• Conducted brief of the Army Development
  System Update - Officer GOSC meeting.
• Obtained approval for ADSU-O from GOSC
• - Format
• - Objectives
• - Agenda
• - Issues
• Guidance ?