Disasters and Public Health: Learning from Recent History - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Disasters and Public Health: Learning from Recent History

Description:

What can we learn about public health by studying recent natural and ... as physical geography, geology, seismology, volcanology, meteorology, toxicology. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: richard630
Learn more at: https://www.nwcphp.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Disasters and Public Health: Learning from Recent History


1
Disasters and Public HealthLearning from Recent
History
  • Richard Keller, PhD
  • Dept. of Medical History and Bioethics
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • rckeller_at_wisc.edu

2
Public Health and the History of Disasters
  • What can we learn about public health by studying
    recent natural and environmental disasters?
  • What do disasters teach us about risk and
    vulnerability?
  • What about this research is translatable to
    public health practice?

3
Poll Question
  • In your opinion, are there any practical things
    that can be done to enhance a communitys
    resilience prior to the experience of a disaster?

A. Yes B. No
4
Examples
  • Bhopal 3 December 1984
  • Chernobyl 26 April 1986
  • Chicago heat wave July 1995
  • European heat wave August 2003
  • Hurricane Katrina AugustSeptember 2005
  • Each with important lessons on risk,
    vulnerability, and coupling of human-natural
    systems

5
Objectives
  • This presentation will help participants
  • Develop the ability to recognize social
    dimensions of risk
  • Understand how environmental and technological
    hazards are often linked to poor health outcomes
  • Define policy initiatives that could promote
    greater resilience among vulnerable populations

6
Vulnerability and Resentment
  • Bhopal and Katrina

7
Disaster in a Social Frame
  • Much study of disaster is conducted in fields
    such as physical geography, geology, seismology,
    volcanology, meteorology, toxicology.

Great Sumatra/ Andaman Earthquake
8
But
  • Recent episodes demonstrate importance of
    understanding social and cultural dimensions of
    disaster.

Hurricane Katrina
9
Bhopal
  • Internationalization of risk and responsibility
  • Critical factors
  • Uncontrolled urbanization
  • Outsourcing of risk
  • Engineered unpreparedness
  • Outcomes
  • Unclear mm
  • Nonexistent management
  • Aimless litigation and resentment

10
Hurricane Katrina
  • Revelation of unequal burden of vulnerability
  • Poor management
  • Public health consequences ongoing
  • Q Who is a disaster victim?

11
Poll Question
  • In your opinion, which of the following are
    victims of a disaster?

A. Someone stranded on a rooftop by a flood B.
Someone who drowns in a flood C. Someone
displaced by a flood, who commits suicide years
later D. All of the above
12
Cities and Vulnerability
13
Mapping Resilience and Vulnerability
  • Neighborhood studies
  • Corollary to epidemiological case-control studies
  • How does one neighborhood experience relatively
    little damage or bounce back quickly, while a
    nearby neighborhood experiences utter
    devastation?
  • Examples
  • Fire in Southern California
  • Heat in Chicago
  • Heat in Paris

14
Fire in Greater Los Angeles (Davis 1999)
  • Malibu
  • Regular wildfires insurance and federal/state
    programs cover damage and ensure rapid response
  • Downtown LA
  • Regular building fires poorly funded fire
    stations, disregard for building codes, absence
    of funding mean greater aggregate damage and
    failure of state to respond
  • Movie stars vs. immigrants, ethnic minorities
  • Socioeconomic, cultural, and political inequality

15
Heat Wave in Chicago, July 1995 (Klinenberg 2002)
  • 700 excess deaths, mostly African-American, very
    few whites and Latinos
  • City, public health officials offer dubious
    cultural explanation for divergent mortality
  • Latinos more habituated to heat
  • Latinos have closer family ties, therefore less
    isolated (questionable)

16
Neighborhood Study
  • Qualitative analysis of two neighborhoods
  • North Lawndale (African-American)
  • Little Village (Latino)
  • Abutting communities
  • Identical microclimates
  • Similar socioeconomic conditions
  • Similar age of populations

17
North Lawndale
  • Degraded infrastructure and decaying housing
    stock Economic decline in aftermath of white
    flight and industrial relocation
  • Aging and unfit population High rates of
    obesity, hypertension, heart disease
  • Drug trafficking, gang warfare, high crime rate
    creates climate of fear
  • Result Difficult for aging populations to leave
    home, poor social integration of most vulnerable
    populations
  • Isolation in brick apartments/houses, with
    windows shut out of fear

18
Little Village
  • Similar population size, income level, age,
    lower, significant crime rate and gang activity
  • Less white flight
  • Most important Significant economic/commercial
    activity and street life
  • Result Vulnerable populations leave apartments,
    even at night, for air-conditioned/cooler
    locations, lowering risk factors
  • Not ethnic protection factor Lower mortality
    even among whites in Little Village
  • Not socioeconomic More a function of different
    behavior than one of different incomes

19
Poll Question
  • In your opinion, which of the following goals of
    public policy is most important to your local
    communitys resilience in the face of a disaster?

A. Robust local economic/commercial activity B.
Equity of social and physical infrastructures C.
Community cohesion and social integration D.
Clear plans for disaster response
20
Heat Wave in Paris Beaugrenelle
21
Heat Wave in Paris Auteuil
22
Deaths from Heat Wave
Deaths by Age and Sex, 120 August 2003
16,000
14,000
12,000
10,000
Women
8,000
Men
Total
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
44 and
4574
75 and
Total
under
over
Source INSERM
23
Ile-de-France
  • 32.9 of excess mortality concentrated in one
    region (4866 unanticipated deaths)
  • Paris 7.2 (1066)
  • But only roughly 3.33 of French population
  • Other hard-hit areas
  • Hauts-de-Seine (5.4)
  • Val-de-Marne (5.1)
  • Seine-Saint-Denis (3.9)

24
Why Did They Die?
  • Poor thermoregulation
  • Lower perception of thirst
  • Highest risk groups those over 75 years of age
    and psychiatric/neurological patients

25
Risk Factors Socioeconomic Status
4.0
3.5
Management, executive
3.0
Middle management
2.5
Employee
2.0
1.5
Artisan, skilled labor
1.0
Worker, other
0.5
0.0
Source InVS
26
Risk Factors SES and Its Markers
Odds ratio
Housing situation
1.12
Other than top floor
2.33
Top floor
1.39
No elevator
Odds ratio
Bath facilities
1.00
Shower
0.86
Shower and bath
1.49
Bath
2.47
None
Source InVS
27
Risk Factors Behavior During Heat Wave
Odds ratio
Departure from home
1.00
Regular, no reason specified
0.54
Seeking a cool place
3.90
Rare (weekly or less)
4.97
Grocery delivery
Odds ratio
Shower/bath frequency
1.00
More than daily
3.14
Daily
12.09
Every other day
15.61
Weekly
20.76
Never
Source InVS
0.47
Media exposure TV/Radio
28
Risk Factors Social Integration
OR
Degree of social interaction
0.59
Living alone
OR
Frequency of visitors
1.00
Never or rarely
2.81
24 x weekly
3.60
Daily or more
6.12
No social activity
29
Poverty, Isolation, Accumulation of Risk
30
Marginalization and Social Citizenship
  • You know, the elderly, they dont have very good
    memories, often from one moment to another, so
    the preventive messages that we could airwell,
    theyd forget them the same day!
  • Jean-François Mattéi 15
    August 2003

Source INA
31
A Science of Resilience Critical Themes and
Concepts
  • Integrating social scientific and humanistic
    knowledge in disaster risk reduction and
    assessments of vulnerability and resilience
  • Mapping resilience and vulnerability
  • Intersections of health, citizenship, and
    resilience
  • Violence and vulnerability Research problems and
    possibilities
  • Goal A societal resilience index?

32
Political/Social Dimensions of Resilience
  • Problem Biological citizenship and cultures of
    reparation
  • Claims to citizenship based on vulnerability
  • Chernobyl

Chernobyl memorial, Vilnius. Photo Alma Pater
33
Other Examples
  • Bhopal
  • Brazils AIDS program
  • What potential mechanisms can ensure other forms
    of security to avoid replication of such
    patterns, particularly in developing countries?

34
Opportunity?
  • Relative dearth of research on basic social
    factors promoting vulnerability or resilience
  • Ultimate vs. proximate causes
  • Importance of civic, economic, political, and
    practical equality as components of resilient
    societies, vs. prevalence of structural violence
    (economic, social, political marginalization
    inhibited agency) as critical factor determining
    vulnerability

35
Goal A Societal Resilience Index?
  • Building on models of vulnerability
  • Can we determine an index of resilience
  • To what uses can this index be put (insurance,
    resource allocation)?
  • Critical variables
  • Age, personal wealth, ethnicity, occupation, and
    infrastructure dependence
  • Density of the built environment, housing stock,
    and tenancy
  • Coupling of technological systems

36
  • We are now going to open the phone lines and ask
    people to verbally share one thing you might do
    differently in your practice in light of todays
    discussion.
  • Simply raise your hand by clicking on the hand
    raise icon. We will call on you.

37
Conclusions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com