Title: Disasters and Public Health: Learning from Recent History
1Disasters and Public HealthLearning from Recent
History
- Richard Keller, PhD
- Dept. of Medical History and Bioethics
- University of Wisconsin-Madison
- rckeller_at_wisc.edu
2Public Health and the History of Disasters
- What can we learn about public health by studying
recent natural and environmental disasters? - What do disasters teach us about risk and
vulnerability? - What about this research is translatable to
public health practice?
3Poll Question
- In your opinion, are there any practical things
that can be done to enhance a communitys
resilience prior to the experience of a disaster?
A. Yes B. No
4Examples
- Bhopal 3 December 1984
- Chernobyl 26 April 1986
- Chicago heat wave July 1995
- European heat wave August 2003
- Hurricane Katrina AugustSeptember 2005
- Each with important lessons on risk,
vulnerability, and coupling of human-natural
systems
5Objectives
- This presentation will help participants
- Develop the ability to recognize social
dimensions of risk - Understand how environmental and technological
hazards are often linked to poor health outcomes - Define policy initiatives that could promote
greater resilience among vulnerable populations
6Vulnerability and Resentment
7Disaster in a Social Frame
- Much study of disaster is conducted in fields
such as physical geography, geology, seismology,
volcanology, meteorology, toxicology.
Great Sumatra/ Andaman Earthquake
8But
- Recent episodes demonstrate importance of
understanding social and cultural dimensions of
disaster.
Hurricane Katrina
9Bhopal
- Internationalization of risk and responsibility
- Critical factors
- Uncontrolled urbanization
- Outsourcing of risk
- Engineered unpreparedness
- Outcomes
- Unclear mm
- Nonexistent management
- Aimless litigation and resentment
10Hurricane Katrina
- Revelation of unequal burden of vulnerability
- Poor management
- Public health consequences ongoing
- Q Who is a disaster victim?
11Poll Question
- In your opinion, which of the following are
victims of a disaster?
A. Someone stranded on a rooftop by a flood B.
Someone who drowns in a flood C. Someone
displaced by a flood, who commits suicide years
later D. All of the above
12Cities and Vulnerability
13Mapping Resilience and Vulnerability
- Neighborhood studies
- Corollary to epidemiological case-control studies
- How does one neighborhood experience relatively
little damage or bounce back quickly, while a
nearby neighborhood experiences utter
devastation? - Examples
- Fire in Southern California
- Heat in Chicago
- Heat in Paris
14Fire in Greater Los Angeles (Davis 1999)
- Malibu
- Regular wildfires insurance and federal/state
programs cover damage and ensure rapid response - Downtown LA
- Regular building fires poorly funded fire
stations, disregard for building codes, absence
of funding mean greater aggregate damage and
failure of state to respond - Movie stars vs. immigrants, ethnic minorities
- Socioeconomic, cultural, and political inequality
15Heat Wave in Chicago, July 1995 (Klinenberg 2002)
- 700 excess deaths, mostly African-American, very
few whites and Latinos - City, public health officials offer dubious
cultural explanation for divergent mortality - Latinos more habituated to heat
- Latinos have closer family ties, therefore less
isolated (questionable)
16Neighborhood Study
- Qualitative analysis of two neighborhoods
- North Lawndale (African-American)
- Little Village (Latino)
- Abutting communities
- Identical microclimates
- Similar socioeconomic conditions
- Similar age of populations
17North Lawndale
- Degraded infrastructure and decaying housing
stock Economic decline in aftermath of white
flight and industrial relocation - Aging and unfit population High rates of
obesity, hypertension, heart disease - Drug trafficking, gang warfare, high crime rate
creates climate of fear - Result Difficult for aging populations to leave
home, poor social integration of most vulnerable
populations - Isolation in brick apartments/houses, with
windows shut out of fear
18Little Village
- Similar population size, income level, age,
lower, significant crime rate and gang activity - Less white flight
- Most important Significant economic/commercial
activity and street life - Result Vulnerable populations leave apartments,
even at night, for air-conditioned/cooler
locations, lowering risk factors - Not ethnic protection factor Lower mortality
even among whites in Little Village - Not socioeconomic More a function of different
behavior than one of different incomes
19Poll Question
- In your opinion, which of the following goals of
public policy is most important to your local
communitys resilience in the face of a disaster?
A. Robust local economic/commercial activity B.
Equity of social and physical infrastructures C.
Community cohesion and social integration D.
Clear plans for disaster response
20Heat Wave in Paris Beaugrenelle
21Heat Wave in Paris Auteuil
22Deaths from Heat Wave
Deaths by Age and Sex, 120 August 2003
16,000
14,000
12,000
10,000
Women
8,000
Men
Total
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
44 and
4574
75 and
Total
under
over
Source INSERM
23Ile-de-France
- 32.9 of excess mortality concentrated in one
region (4866 unanticipated deaths) - Paris 7.2 (1066)
- But only roughly 3.33 of French population
- Other hard-hit areas
- Hauts-de-Seine (5.4)
- Val-de-Marne (5.1)
- Seine-Saint-Denis (3.9)
24Why Did They Die?
- Poor thermoregulation
- Lower perception of thirst
- Highest risk groups those over 75 years of age
and psychiatric/neurological patients
25Risk Factors Socioeconomic Status
4.0
3.5
Management, executive
3.0
Middle management
2.5
Employee
2.0
1.5
Artisan, skilled labor
1.0
Worker, other
0.5
0.0
Source InVS
26Risk Factors SES and Its Markers
Odds ratio
Housing situation
1.12
Other than top floor
2.33
Top floor
1.39
No elevator
Odds ratio
Bath facilities
1.00
Shower
0.86
Shower and bath
1.49
Bath
2.47
None
Source InVS
27Risk Factors Behavior During Heat Wave
Odds ratio
Departure from home
1.00
Regular, no reason specified
0.54
Seeking a cool place
3.90
Rare (weekly or less)
4.97
Grocery delivery
Odds ratio
Shower/bath frequency
1.00
More than daily
3.14
Daily
12.09
Every other day
15.61
Weekly
20.76
Never
Source InVS
0.47
Media exposure TV/Radio
28Risk Factors Social Integration
OR
Degree of social interaction
0.59
Living alone
OR
Frequency of visitors
1.00
Never or rarely
2.81
24 x weekly
3.60
Daily or more
6.12
No social activity
29Poverty, Isolation, Accumulation of Risk
30Marginalization and Social Citizenship
- You know, the elderly, they dont have very good
memories, often from one moment to another, so
the preventive messages that we could airwell,
theyd forget them the same day! - Jean-François Mattéi 15
August 2003
Source INA
31A Science of Resilience Critical Themes and
Concepts
- Integrating social scientific and humanistic
knowledge in disaster risk reduction and
assessments of vulnerability and resilience - Mapping resilience and vulnerability
- Intersections of health, citizenship, and
resilience - Violence and vulnerability Research problems and
possibilities - Goal A societal resilience index?
32Political/Social Dimensions of Resilience
- Problem Biological citizenship and cultures of
reparation - Claims to citizenship based on vulnerability
- Chernobyl
Chernobyl memorial, Vilnius. Photo Alma Pater
33Other Examples
- Bhopal
- Brazils AIDS program
- What potential mechanisms can ensure other forms
of security to avoid replication of such
patterns, particularly in developing countries?
34Opportunity?
- Relative dearth of research on basic social
factors promoting vulnerability or resilience - Ultimate vs. proximate causes
- Importance of civic, economic, political, and
practical equality as components of resilient
societies, vs. prevalence of structural violence
(economic, social, political marginalization
inhibited agency) as critical factor determining
vulnerability
35Goal A Societal Resilience Index?
- Building on models of vulnerability
- Can we determine an index of resilience
- To what uses can this index be put (insurance,
resource allocation)? - Critical variables
- Age, personal wealth, ethnicity, occupation, and
infrastructure dependence - Density of the built environment, housing stock,
and tenancy - Coupling of technological systems
36- We are now going to open the phone lines and ask
people to verbally share one thing you might do
differently in your practice in light of todays
discussion. - Simply raise your hand by clicking on the hand
raise icon. We will call on you.
37Conclusions