DualUse Dilemmas and National Regulations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

DualUse Dilemmas and National Regulations

Description:

... of life sciences experts convened ... by the National Academy of Sciences concluded that ... Biased towards promotion of med/science? Not security experts ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: michaels55
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DualUse Dilemmas and National Regulations


1
Dual-Use Dilemmas and National Regulations
  • Michael J. Selgelid
  • Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Applied
    Philosophy and Public Ethics
  • The Australian National University
  • michael.selgelid_at_anu.edu.au
  • http//www.cappe.edu.au/staff/michael-selgelid.htm

2
Multiple uses of dual use
  • Dual Use has multiple meanings
  • Civilian and military use (two birds, one stone)
  • Good and bad use, where bad use involves weapons
    (of mass destruction).

3
CIA Our Darker Bioweapons Future
  • A panel of life sciences experts convened by
    the National Academy of Sciences concluded that
    advances in biotechnology ... have the potential
    to create a much more dangerous biological
    warfare (BW) threat. The panel noted that the
    effects of some of these engineered biological
    agents could be worse than any disease known to
    man.

4
Levels of Governance
  • Individual Scientists
  • Educational and Research Institutions
  • Scientific communities and/or organisations
  • Science publishers
  • National governments
  • International (governance) bodies

5
Dual Use Pipeline
  • What research gets done
  • Dissemination of research findings (i.e.,
    knowledge)
  • Production and dissemination of dual use
    materials/technology
  • Use of (discovered/disseminated) dual use
    knowledge/materials/technology

6
The Fink Report
  • US NRC recommendation (r/e dissemination of
    information)
  • Voluntary self-governance of scientific community

7
Governmental Control?
  • Security Community/Govt
  • Governmental interference would stall important
    areas of research
  • Likely biased towards promotion of security?
  • Poor judges of scientific importance?
  • Slippery slope threat to civil liberties and
    freedom of speech

8
Self-Governance?
  • Scientists/editors
  • Conflicts of interest?
  • Biased towards promotion of med/science?
  • Not security experts
  • Systematically denied information essential to
    risk assessment
  • Risk of mousepox study depends on
    classified information
  • Cannot rely on self-governance, top-down
    regulation is needed.

9
Wanted
  • Balance between promotion of science and
    security.
  • Need
  • Decision-making authority embodying both science
    and security values (without being biased towards
    either)
  • Decision-making authority embodying sufficient
    science and security expertise

10
Who should govern?
  • An independent regulatory authority?
  • (at national level)
  • But there is need for international solution.

11
Bioethics on Genetics
  • Environmental Dangers of Recombinant DNA
  • Genetic Testing
  • Discrimination
  • Selective Reproduction/Eugenics
  • Cloning and Stem Cell Research
  • DNA Fingerprinting
  • Patenting
  • ? Not biological weapons

12
Role of Ethics
  • Informing policy debate and regulations
    development
  • Education of scientists
  • About BTWC
  • About dual use
  • Role in oversight/review process
  • ? draw from relevant areas of
    ethico-philosophical discourse
  • ? note precedents r/e clinical research ethics
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com