Planetary Radar Imaging of Binary Asteroids - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Planetary Radar Imaging of Binary Asteroids

Description:

Is this an object with a satellite, or a weird-shaped object? Unambiguous Detection? ... Division of Planetary Science of the AAS statements support the radar program. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: jil115
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Planetary Radar Imaging of Binary Asteroids


1
Planetary Radar Imaging of Binary Asteroids
  • Michael C. Nolan, Ellen S. Howell, (Arecibo
    Observatory), Lance A. M. Benner, Steven J.
    Ostro, Jon D. Giorgini (JPL/Caltech),
  • Chris Magri (U. Maine, Farmington), Jean-Luc
    Margot (Cornell), Michael Shepard (Bloomsburg U.)

2
1999 KW4 viewed in orbit plane
3
Radar Imaging of Binaries
  • Absolute ranges and radial velocities
  • Scaled by sin i, but no reflectivity assumptions
    for scales or sizes.
  • Geometry not very important for detection.
  • Pathological cases exist, but mutual events are
    not required.
  • Unambiguous detection in a single night.
  • Common trend for slowly-rotating secondaries
    makes detection likely.
  • Rapidly rotating secondaries would be harder to
    detect.
  • Fairly easy to quantify detection limits.

4
Radar Imaging of Binaries
  • Absolute ranges and radial velocities
  • Scaled by sin i, but no reflectivity assumptions
    for scales or sizes.
  • Geometry not very important for detection.
  • Pathological cases exist, but mutual events are
    not required.
  • Unambiguous detection in a single night.
  • Common trend for slowly-rotating secondaries
    makes detection likely.
  • Rapidly rotating secondaries would be harder to
    detect.
  • Fairly easy to quantify detection limits.

5
Absolute size and velocity
  • No scale uncertainty
  • sin i (velocity)
  • SNR matters

6
Radar Imaging of Binaries
  • Absolute ranges and radial velocities
  • Scaled by sin i, but no reflectivity assumptions
    for scales or sizes.
  • Geometry not very important for detection.
  • Pathological cases exist, but mutual events are
    not required.
  • Unambiguous detection in a single night.
  • Common trend for slowly-rotating secondaries
    makes detection likely.
  • Rapidly rotating secondaries would be harder to
    detect.
  • Fairly easy to quantify detection limits.

7
Geometry not very Important
  • Radar beam is 4000 km across at 0.1 AU.
  • A satellite in the plane of sky would be
    invisible.
  • Mutual event could hide satellite (low measure)

8
Radar Imaging of Binaries
  • Absolute ranges and radial velocities
  • Scaled by sin i, but no reflectivity assumptions
    for scales or sizes.
  • Geometry not very important for detection.
  • Pathological cases exist, but mutual events are
    not required.
  • Unambiguous detection in a single night.
  • Common trend for slowly-rotating secondaries
    makes detection likely.
  • Rapidly rotating secondaries would be harder to
    detect.
  • Fairly easy to quantify detection limits.

9
Unambiguous Detection
  • Dont need to wait for mutual event.
  • SNR
  • Shape
  • Uncertain if at same range, but thats when its
    moving fast.

10
Unambiguous Detection?
  • Is this an object with a satellite, or a
    weird-shaped object?

11
Unambiguous Detection?
  • Is this an object with secondaries, or a
    weird-shaped object?
  • 73P/Schwachmann-Wachmann 3 (B)

12
Radar Imaging of Binaries
  • Absolute ranges and radial velocities
  • Scaled by sin i, but no reflectivity assumptions
    for scales or sizes.
  • Geometry not very important for detection.
  • Pathological cases exist, but mutual events are
    not required.
  • Unambiguous detection in a single night.
  • Common trend for slowly-rotating secondaries
    makes detection likely.
  • Rapidly rotating secondaries would be harder to
    detect.
  • Fairly easy to quantify detection limits.

13
Slowly rotating secondaries
  • Secondaries typically rotate slowly, giving
    narrow Doppler width and high brightness.

14
Very Fast Rotator
15
Changing Frequency Resolution
  • Can rescale frequency to increase SNR of fast
    rotator.
  • Eye is pretty good at picking out linear
    structure anyway.

16
Radar Imaging of Binaries
  • Must come near the Earth (0.1 AU) for sufficient
    SNR.
  • Relatively short observing windows
  • 2001 SN263 had 14 days, but thats unusual.
  • Only Arecibo and Goldstone, difficult to get long
    windows on short notice.
  • Goldstones primary missions is spacecraft
    communications.
  • Arecibo heavily oversubscribed. I can
    occasionally say We need this one (2000 DP107
    and 2001 SN263).

17
Detectability
  • Radar Matched SNR ? D3/2P1/2R-4
  • SNR reduced (linearly) if object is resolved in
    range.
  • SNR reduced (sqrt) if object is over- or
    under-resolved in Doppler.

18
2001 SN263
  • We chose near-Earth asteroid 2001 SN263 for an
    extensive campaign because of its large size
    (2km) and long Arecibo view window.
  • Got lucky with schedule only conflict was very
    flexible.
  • Discovery of first near-Earth triple asteroid
    system, the only one where we have images of the
    components
  • Orbits will reveal density of primitive material
    (near-IR spectrum suggests carbonaceous
    chondrite-like)
  • Is this a stable system, or is it young and
    evolving? How common are multiple systems?

19
2001 SN263
12 13 14 18
21 23 24 26
Date in February 2008
20
2001 SN263
12 13 14
18 21 23
24 26
21
2001 SN263
22
2001 SN263
23
2001 SN263
  • These values give density 0.7 to 1.0 for a sphere
  • Fairly uncertain
  • KW4-like shape volume lt sphere
  • Size consistent with albedo of 0.04 from thermal
    model (E. Howell)

24
Funding
  • The planetary community has made their support of
    the program known to the agencies and to
    Congress.
  • Division of Planetary Science of the AAS
    statements support the radar program.
  • AAS/DPS policy supports the SR.
  • Congressional hearing Nov. 8. Members were very
    supportive.
  • HR 3737 and SR ???? submitted (no action to
    date).
  • The 2008 omnibus appropriations bill directs NASA
    and NSF to fund the radar program and the
    observatory, and to have NRC review the program.
  • NASA planning for review

25
Funding
  • Submitted 2009 NASA budget contains no new
    funding with the NEO observations program
    receiving an increase near inflation (300k).
  • Submitted 2009 NSF AST budget contains an 8 cut
    for the observatory.
  • Congressmen Fortuño (PR) and Rohrbacher (CA) are
    working on changing the 2009 appropriations bill
    to support the radar as a program within NASA.
  • Relevant officials at NASA and NSF maintain their
    stance each agency believes that the program is
    valuable and should be supported by the other
    one.
  • I dont know whether this was an exhaustive
    search for funding, but I am exhausted.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com