Autism: Cognitive Assessment Findings - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Autism: Cognitive Assessment Findings

Description:

Some demonstrate superior splinter skills for a narrow range of abilities. ... cases, the presence of superior splinter skills, which may go undetected during ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:129
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: shanno76
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Autism: Cognitive Assessment Findings


1
Autism Cognitive Assessment Findings
  • Shannon Burns
  • Georgia State University
  • CPS 7490

2
Diagnostic Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, fourth
    edition (DSM-IV) contains the most current
    diagnostic criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder.
  • Due to the high rate of false-positive diagnoses
    that resulted from criteria published in previous
    editions of the DSM, an extensive field trial was
    conducted involving 125 diagnosticians across 21
    sites (Freeman Cronin, 2002). The findings of
    this study resulted in the development of the
    criteria currently found in the DSM-IV, which
    include
  • Impairment of social interaction.
  • Qualitative impairments in communication.
  • Repetitive behaviors that exhibit a restricted
    range of interest inconsistent with developmental
    expectations.
  • Abnormal functioning in social communication,
    social interaction, or developmentally
    appropriate play must be evident before 3 years
    of age.

3
Diagnostic Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • The criteria for diagnosing autism are entirely
    behavioral.
  • One reason for this is its unknown etiology. A
    minority of autism cases have known causes, such
    as the fragile X chromosome abnormality,
    congenital rubella, tuberous sclerosis, and a
    variety of structural abnormalities of the brain,
    but none of these conditions are consistently
    correlated with autism (Rapin, 2001).
  • Also, due to the extremely young ages of most
    referrals and the wide range of cognitive
    functioning which can be displayed among persons
    with autism, cognitive assessments are not
    sufficient diagnostic tools.
  • Thus, diagnostic instruments are usually based on
    two main sources of information descriptions of
    the childs developmental course and behavioral
    patterns given by primary caregivers, and data
    gathered from direct observation.

4
Autism Assessment Tools
  • Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS)
  • Autism Diagnostic Interview Revised (ADI-R)
  • Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Generic
    (ADOS-G)
  • Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (CHAT)
  • Screening Tool for Autism in Two-Year-Olds (STAT)
  • Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC)
  • E-1 and E-2 scales by Rimland
  • Detection of Autism by Infant Sociability
    Interview (DAISI)
  • Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS)

5
The Role of Cognitive Assessments
  • Cognitive assessments should be used to
    supplement behavioral scales and developmental
    checklists.
  • Autistic children have a wide range of
    intellectual competencies.
  • The mean IQ of the autistic population is low,
    but at least 30 have an IQ above 70.
  • Some demonstrate superior splinter skills for a
    narrow range of abilities.
  • While a diagnosis of autism cannot be made based
    on cognitive functioning alone, individuals with
    autism do demonstrate a typical pattern of
    performance deficits on intelligence tests
    (Blackwell, 2001).
  • They can provide standardized information about
    the overall cognitive functioning of a child, the
    presence of specific deficits, or in rare cases,
    the presence of superior splinter skills, which
    may go undetected during behavioral observation.

6
Carpentieri and Morgans (1994) Study
  • Purpose To find out if autistic and nonautistic
    retarded children with the same IQs would show
    patterns of strengths and weaknesses distinctive
    from one another on the Stanford-Binet IV.
  • Sample 15 autistic retarded children (mean CA
    8.72 years) and 15 nonautistic retarded children
    (mean CA 8.78 years) from local programs for
    the developmentally disabled.
  • Procedure Each subject was administered the
    eight subtests designated in the SB-IV manual as
    appropriate for assessment of children
    functioning at the preschool level, and were able
    to give scoreable responses.

7
Carpentieri and Morgans (1994) Study Results
  • Although highly comparable in age and general
    intellectual functioning, the autistic retarded
    group and the nonautistic retarded group showed
    highly significant differences in scores that
    reflect verbal abilities.
  • Autistic children scored substantially lower in
    the Verbal Reasoning area than the retarded
    children, indicating greater impairment of
    general verbal functioning.
  • At the subtest level the autistic children score
    substantially lower on both Comprehension and
    Absurdities. These are the only two subtests that
    are interpreted as assessing social knowledge and
    the ability to use and relate general life
    experiences.

8
Mayes and Calhoun's (2003) Study
  • Purpose To understand the cognitive strengths
    and weaknesses of children with autism and
    possible effect of age and IQ on Stanford-Binet
    IV and WISC-III ability profiles and academic
    achievement.
  • Sample Children referred to a child diagnostic
    clinic who met DSM-IV criteria for autism. 53
    were given the SB-IV (3 to 7 years of age, M
    4.8), and 63 were given the WISC-III (7 to 15
    years of age, M8.5).
  • Procedure Children were divided into a low IQ
    group (lt80) and a high IQ group (gt80). Those
    given the SB-IV were administered the
    Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration
    (VMI), and those tested on the WISC-III were
    given the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test
    (WAIT). Both cognitive and achievement profiles
    were then analyzed for strengths and weaknesses,
    as well as age and IQ differences.

9
Mayes and Calhoun's (2003) Study Results
  • Age Effect Nonverbal IQs were greater than
    verbal IQs for young children (3-7 years of age)
    on the SB-IV for both low and high IQ groups.
    However, WISC-III verbal and nonverbal IQs were
    similar for the older group (7-15 years).
  • SB-IV Profiles were similar overall for the two
    IQ groups, with high scores on Bead Memory and
    Quantitative Reasoning, indicating that young
    children with autism have strengths in visual
    skills, and rote learning, regardless of level of
    intelligence.
  • WISC-III Both IQ groups scored significantly
    lower on the Comprehension subtest than on the
    Information, Similarities, and Vocabulary
    subtests, indicating a relative weakness in
    verbal comprehension and social reasoning.
  • The low IQ group showed strengths in visuo-motor,
    and visuospatial skills indicated by Block Design
    and Object Assembly scores.
  • The high IQ group showed significant weaknesses
    in on the Freedom from Distractibility Index
    (Digit Span and Arithmetic subtests), which is
    also characteristic of children with ADHD.

10
Considerations for Assessing Autistic Children
  • Gross and fine motor impairments are common among
    children with autism (Blackwell, 2001).
  • Motor stereotypes are also common, such as hand
    flapping, finger mannerisms, body rocking, or
    unusual posturing.
  • The severity of motor deficits is inversely
    related to IQ.
  • Sensory impairments include preoccupation with
    the sensory features of an object, over or
    underresponsiveness to particular stimuli, or
    inconsistent responses to sensory stimuli
    overall.
  • Attention disorders are present in nearly all
    autistic children to some degree (Rapin, 2002).
  • The manifestations are variable, though. Some are
    highly distractible and hyperactive, while others
    can demonstrate long attention spans but only for
    a select few activities which they find highly
    interesting.

11
Considerations for Assessing Autistic Children
  • Deckner, Soraci, Blanton, and Deckner (1984)
    conducted a study with 18 severely autistic
    students in a school for psychotic children.
  • Their levels of functioning were such that the
    Catelle Infant Intelligence Scale had to be
    substituted for the Stanford-Binet and many were
    so behaviorally disordered or that was impossible
    to complete their evaluations without some kind
    of modification.
  • The children were intermittently reinforced with
    small bits of preferred foods for general
    compliance during testing, and as a result
    attentiveness, motivation, and consistency of
    response all increased significantly.
  • As a result, the children successfully completed
    their assessments, and their scores reflected a
    more accurate measure of their cognitive
    functioning.

12
Considerations for Assessing Autistic Children
  • Language is delayed, distorted, or absent
    altogether in children with autism (Kanner,
    1997).
  • This makes it likely that IQ scores will be
    misleading, as many subtests of cognitive
    assessments are verbal, or require a solution
    that would be enhanced by a verbal strategy
  • Some preschool dysphasic autistic students who
    turn out to possess normal intelligence once they
    learn to speak, are mislabeled as mentally
    deficient when initially assessed with
    language-loaded tests.
  • Nonverbal assessments, such as the Universal
    Nonverbal Intelligence Test (UNIT) can be
    effective in measuring cognitive functioning in
    autistic children without the danger of
    misdiagnosis based on speech-language
    impairments.
  • See sample UNIT scores in handout.

13
References
  • Blackwell, J. (2001). Clinical practice
    guideline Screening and diagnosing autism.
    Journal of the American Academy of Nurse
    Practitioners, 13, 534-536.
  • Carpentieri, S. C., Morgan, S. B. (1994). Brief
    report A comparison of patterns of cognitive
    functioning of autistic and nonautistic retarded
    children on the Stanford-Binet Fourth Edition.
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,
    24, 215-223.
  • Deckner, C. W., Soraci, S. A., Jr., Blanton, R.
    L., Deckner, P. O. (1984). The relationships
    among two experimental and four psychometric
    assessments of abnormal children. Journal of
    Clinical Child Psychology, 13, 157-164.
  • Freeman, B. J., Cronin, P. (2002). Diagnosing
    autism spectrum disorder in young children An
    update. Infants and Young Children, 14, 1-10.
  • Kanner, L. (1997). Autism Part I. Harvard
    Mental Health Letter, 13, 1-4.
  • Mayes, S. D., Calhoun, S. L. (2003). Analysis
    of WISC-III, Stanford-BinetIV, and academic
    achievement test scores in children with autism.
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,
    33, 329-341.
  • Rapin, I. (2001). Autistic children Diagnosis
    and clinical features. Pediatrics, 87, 751-761.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com